So you define information entropy as "junk DNA". Thanks for making your position clear.
What is your take on human endogenous retroviruses?
www.cshl.edu
www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk
Of course you have no clue. You don't get out much.
Do you have a clue what you are talking about? I am still going with no.
The first living thing could never have arisen by random processes.
We know. We agree with you. Why do you have to repeat yourself?
No, you fail logic 101. Therefore the first living organism arose by some non-random processes.
It still does help your case at all.
You are assuming protein first. That is a possible hypothesis, but there are others. For example, the mathematics for RNA world are different, because there are only four bases: ACGU, rather then 20 amino acids. That difference will change the probability calculation.
The RNA world is another possibility except that creature RNA would still need lots of proteins to function. It also would be a more complicated creature. It would be way more impossible to come into existence through random processes.
No. RNA is a jack-of-all-trades, and can function as both information storage and as enzymes (ribozymes). It is a master of neither, but it can do both jobs.
RNA only replicates with the help of many proteins.
In modern, evolved, life, yes. Back with new, unevolved life, it used ribozymes instead of proteins. The proteins came later, as did DNA.
Sloppily. No doubt some pieces leaked out, while others leaked in. Natural selection would eliminate any that lost essential pieces, or that took in poisonous chemicals. The cell contents would be multiple copies of short RNA strings. As long as each divided part had a few copies of all the essential strings then each part would be viable.
Diffusion. These are chemotrophs, so their food is relatively small molecules.
Diffusion, the same way modern bacteria do.
DNA is a chemical, it is not alive and does not evolve.
Again and again you trot out your ignorant, uniformed opinion as fact.
Why should I believe it was not Allah?
The smaller the sequence, the odds rapidly are against survival and reproduction. It also actually requires even more miraculous events to produce all living things that have ever lived and all the amino acid sequences in all of them. There may have existed 10^50 total sequences of amino acids pairs in all living things.
You do realise that all your numbers are less than infinity, don't you? In fact they are infinitely less than infinity. They are also less than the number of earthlike planets in the observable universe, let alone an infinite one. They are also less than the number of interacting chemicals on just one earthlike planet over the course of a billion years. Probability doesn't help you.
Except of course, the first living thing, which I also showed to be impossible through natural processes.
I see you are just ignoring what I actually said, and going off into some new flight of fancy.
So you think a miracle is needed each time a worm is born? This seems to be the implication of what you are saying.
Another number you pulled out of your backside?
You do not understand probability, do you? If there are 20 amino acids, each in abundant supply, the probability of getting a specific sequence 10^50 amino acids long in a single event would be 20^(10^50) to 1.
Another number extracted from your backside?
Another ignorant and uninformed opinion stated as fact.
Why should I believe it was not Allah?
I have already proven the Bible is the true word of God.
Improbable is not the same as impossible. Improbable, given sufficient opportunities, is almost guaranteed. "Overwhelming odds" is meaningless in a universe with overwhelming numbers of opportunities.
The over 1 trillion impossibles were all impossible.