Buzzard said:
Gen.3:15
And I will put
enmity between thee and the woman,
and between
thy seed and
her seed;
it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
thy seed---enmity --- her seed;
If you let Scripture interpert Scripture,
then we must go by the words of Paul
Eph.2:11
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh,
who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
12 That at that time ye were without Christ,
being
aliens from the commonwealth of Israel,
and strangers from the covenants of promise,
having no hope, and without God in the world:
13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one,
and hath broken down
the middle wall of partition between us;
15 Having
abolished in his flesh
the enmity,
even the law of commandments contained in ordinances;
for to make in himself of twain one new man,
so making peace;
16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross,
having slain
the enmity thereby:
Gen.3:15
And I will put
enmity between thee and the woman,
and between
thy seed and
her seed;
it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
thy seed---enmity --- her seed;
Not necessarly;
as has been posted
the different translations reflect the beliefs of the Translators,
And I will put
enmity
(
Enmity
deep-rooted hatred. "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, between thy seed and her seed" (
Genesis 3:15 ). The friendship of the world is "enmity with God" (
James 4:4 ;
1 John 2:15 1 John 2:16 ). The "carnal mind" is "enmity against God" (
Romans 8:7 ). By the abrogation of the Mosaic institutes the "enmity" between Jew and Gentile is removed. They are reconciled, are "made one" (
Ephesians 2:15 Ephesians 2:16 ). )
between thee and the woman,
and between thy seed and her seed;
it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
so they would translate
it to say what they wanted it to say
Are you suggesting that Gen 3:15 is not prophesy referring to the coming of the Messiah? That is Christ? If so, please articulate an argument as to why.
Are you proposing that Daniel 2 not be read in conjunction with Genesis 3? If so, please articulate an argument as to why.
I suppose I could be entirely missing your point. If so, would you kindly clarify your post and intent of communication?
Amosfive asks:
Are you proposing that Daniel 2 not be read in conjunction with Genesis 3? If so, please articulate an argument as to why.
========================
Buzz replys,
No, Daniel 2 is also these Two (2) Groups at odds (enmity; varience, in opposition) with each other
----------
The Two Rocks----------
Deut 32: 1
Give ear, O ye heavens, and I will speak;
and hear, O earth, the words of my mouth.
2 My doctrine shall drop as the rain,
my speech shall distil as the dew,
as the small rain upon the tender herb,
and as the showers upon the grass:
..
For their rock is not as our Rock,
even our enemies themselves being judges.
32 For their vine is of the vine of Sodom,
and of the fields of Gomorrah:
their grapes are grapes of gall,
their clusters are bitter:
33 Their wine is the poison of dragons,
and the cruel venom of asps.
The Two Women Solomon spake of
One led by Christ (
our Rock), the other led by (
their rock) the Rock of Sodom