Bob Carabbio
Well-known member
Which would be your fervent HOPE.Real scientists are doing real science to do just that. We are not there yet, but we are getting closer.
Which would be your fervent HOPE.Real scientists are doing real science to do just that. We are not there yet, but we are getting closer.
Sure. But in my case that HOPE is based on what those scientists have already achieved, rather than just wishful thinking.Which would be your fervent HOPE.
Still a fallacy of argument to the future rendering atheoevo an irrational and illogical faith.Sure. But in my case that HOPE is based on what those scientists have already achieved, rather than just wishful thinking.
Your guess would be correct.Gosh, the spam bot has been busy today. Luckily I have it on ignore, so I don't know what it's been saying. I can guess though ?
But it is not irrational and illogical because it is supported by real science. With regards to the cell organelle, which was what we were discussing originally, I started a thread on that topic and linked to several real science articles on that topic.Still a fallacy of argument to the future rendering atheoevo an irrational and illogical faith.
That you cannot and do not present. LOLBut it is not irrational and illogical because it is supported by real science.
Threads are not evidence.With regards to the cell organelle, which was what we were discussing originally, I started a thread on that topic and linked to several real science articles on that topic.
And that makes your claims true?And, by the way, I wrote that OP myself, rather than copy-and-pasting someone else's work and pretending it is my own.
all "Scientists achieve" are more theories, so essentially your "Hope" is based on nothing.Sure. But in my case that HOPE is based on what those scientists have already achieved, rather than just wishful thinking.
Notice she never actually addresses the OP and never presents evidence nature caused life to begin.all "Scientists achieve" are more theories, so essentially your "Hope" is based on nothing.
No.So you admit nature did not create life?
What exactly are you expecting? We are discussing how the cell organelle came about. I think that one day scientists will have a very good idea of how it evolved. And yes, that will be a theory. What else would it be?all "Scientists achieve" are more theories, so essentially your "Hope" is based on nothing.
Yup - that's what I said.What exactly are you expecting? We are discussing how the cell organelle came about. I think that one day scientists will have a very good idea of how it evolved. And yes, that will be a theory. What else would it be?
So present evidence nature caused life to begin.
What do you think that evidence would look like?So present evidence nature caused life to begin.
Multiple articles from peer reviewed science journals where multiple repeated scientists create life or observe life beginning in the natural environment.What do you think that evidence would look like?
If multiple scientists created life you'd say it was artificial manipulation and so not evidence that it could happen in nature.Multiple articles from peer reviewed science journals where multiple repeated scientists create life or observe life beginning in the natural environment.
You would have to prove that ever happened.If multiple scientists created life ......
See above.If we observe life beginning in the natural environment you'd claim it was still the result of your God's creation.
You certainly are.You would have to prove that ever happened.
See above.
You go nothing - pathetic.
Avoiding again- So evos - where is your evidence evo created life? What natural process caused life to begin? Where is your evidence?You certainly are.
In the schools, universities, museums, science laboratories, field expeditions, scientific journals and other repositories of knowledge and understanding. Where of course it is safe from your prying eyes as you will never go there.Avoiding again- So evos - where is your evidence evo created life? What natural process caused life to begin? Where is your evidence?