Of course, I understood them that anyone, including proponents of Evolution too claimed many things. But that is the problem: which side is correct?
This is where the scientific method is applied. We look at a theory and determine the necessary consequences - what the theory
predicts. If the theory is true, then we would have to see this, this and this. If the theory of relativity is true, then the orbit of Mercury would necessary be whatever; this is confirmed by observation. If the theory of evolution is true, all species would fall into a nested hierarchy; this is confirmed by observation.
What are the necessary consequences of your theory? There are none. Because it is
pseudo-science.
Evolution side, your side, is wrong. Evolution has no clue on intelligence, thus, Evolution is wrong and falsified.
You can assert that all you like, but it is just wishful thinking, based on your religious faith
There are no objective evidences of Evolution, They are all belong to Biological Interrelation, what are you talking about? You read the article, right? You are science-denier.
And yet over 99% of biologists -
real scientists who have
real science qualifications and
real science careers - accept evolution as science.
In contrast, you have
zero science qualifications and
zero background in science. Just religious faith that you are right.
What is is the problem of tons and tons and tens and tens of thousands so called evidences if they are all founded or built in a wrong foundation? People on ancient times believe e that the sun revolves around the earth...
And so, just like that, you rationalise ignoring the overwhelming evidence for evolution.
If you are going to just ignore the evidence, you can convince yourself any crackpot idea is true.
Even yours.
In
real science, you cannot do that. The reason 99% of biologists -
real scientists who have
real science qualifications and
real science careers - accept evolution as science is the overwhelming evidence that you so casually disregard,
You read the article. You must rebut them if you think I am wrong. Where is the rebuttal?
I have posted several times quoting the article, pointing out what a load of nonsense it is. To be frank, I have ripped your article to sheds, on this very thread.
https://forums.carm.org/threads/evolution-is-falsified.8944/#post-636240
https://forums.carm.org/threads/evolution-is-falsified.8944/#post-637312
https://forums.carm.org/threads/evolution-is-falsified.8944/page-2#post-638486
It is worth looking again at your experiment that you think proves evolution wrong.
Figure 4: Simple experiment on how a radish fight to live. Science 101. I conducted a simple experiment too of separating two identical radishes, see Figure 4. One was put in the direct sunlight with water every day and the other was put in a dark closet, with no water. And after a week, maybe you knew the result, Science 101. The one was put in the closet had grown or lengthened its stems, reaching for sunlight, activating its defense mechanism to live before the radish become non-existence.
Apparently you are so clueless about biology you think this primary-school level experiment proves plants are intelligent! And somehow that leads you to conclude they were created by God because... who know what reasoning?
Further down the page we read:
Maybe, this is the basis of new Physics of Action →3 Reactions. Who knows? Smart and clever scientist like you, please, help me develop this, and probably, you will get a Nobel Prize, too.
Exactly how are you calculating the probability of getting a Nobel prize and determining it is greater than 0.5? Oh, right. Wishful thinking again....
Be honest that you cannot rebut the article. Be honest that you are defeated. You cannot beat reality! You will surely either deny reality or admit defeat.
Bluster is all you have left.
Sad really.