I want to highlight this from page 32 of the article:
Humans could hope that someday, we could build structures that could repair themselves, as lesson learned from intellen biological cell, a finest usage of intelligence, from the new Intelligent Design <id>and explore the outer space more.Maybe, this is the basis of new Physics of Action →3 Reactions. Who knows? Smart and clever scientist like you, please, help me develop this, and probably, you will get a Nobel Prize,too.
Which means, that any change that we are seeing in biological world, especially inside the cell, is always intentional or intelligently guided, intellen, so that life could exist and continue to exist, until its designated death. Which means, further that ToE’s basis of non-intentionalchange is obviouslywrong, thus, ToE is falsified.
Follow the reasoning here. He is saying:
- Humans hope to build structures that repair themselves
- Therefore any change in the biological world is always intentional or intelligently guided
That is quite a leap! A leap of faith, one might say...
Here is a great quote from the bottom of page 34:
But errors or defects, by definition, are fatal, lethal or dangerous to any living organisms and yet, the supposedly new species are functionally well, alive and could produce offspring! How come?!
Apparently this guy has not heard of neutral or beneficial mutations! He continues:
The question that should be answered first was: which was really the original plan of cell before cell got a mistake/error? By using ToE, is it a family level that had become a species level? Or a genus level that had become a species level? Or a species level that had become a new species? Thus, was the original first living organism is species level and not family/kind level or genus level? But ToE did not touch or include the origin of life or origin of first living organism, thus, which is the first life? Family level? Genus level? Or Species level? Because of this negligence and intellectual laziness, ToE is falsified!
He apparently believes that evolution says organisms have a plan to stay whatever species they are!
He has the gall to call real scientists negligent and intellectually lazy! Wow. Perhaps he should learn a bit more about evolution before he throws such words around. Glass houses and all that...
Later he gives us this helpful definition:
The definition of intelligence predicts that if an Intelligent Agent would like to intelligently make/design/create theliving organism, that organisms must always survive, exist and succeed, and is important to that Agent, which means living with intelligence system will always be good, enjoyable and pleasant.
I say helpful because this definition refutes the theory:
- The theory predicts "that organisms must always survive, exist and succeed".
- Dinosaurs have not survived
- Therefore the theory is wrong.
Thanks for that.
Later he says:
Which means, the concluded explanations of scientist of ToE that endogenous retroviruses(ERVs), vestigial organs, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and junk DNAs are bad design are all wrong. Totally wrong! Because, how could these scientists of ToE concluded “bad” design if they did not know “good” design is? How will they know good design if they did not know about “intelligence”? Thus, ToE and all of these topics from ToE are all falsified. ERVs, vestigial organs, RLN and junk DNAs are all support mechanisms, probably some of them are factor of safety, to live. For if not, those living organisms that have them are already dead after birth!
I would love to know how he explains transposons. About 44% of human DNA is made up of transposons - also called Transposable Elements (TEs). These are DNA sequences that can move around. I think the timescale for such a move is on the order of months to years, so you have probably had this happen several times, but if anyone can confirm or deny, that would be great!.
One sequence, called the "Alu element", appears over a millions times in human DNA, making up 15 to 17% of our DNA. The Alu element is considered parasitic as its primary function appears to be to replicate itself within the genome.
According to evoluition - real science - Alu element insertion happens a couple of hundred times in a million years, and there is no known mechanism for deletion, which makes it interesting for evolutionists. Of the million or so sequences in the human genome, only about 7000 are unique to humans, and so will have entered the genome since the human/chimp split.
These articles discuss the evolution of the Alu element from the time of the rodent/primate split up to modern man.
Here we present a draft genome sequence of the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Through comparison with the human genome, we have generated a largely complete catalogue of the genetic differences that have accumulated since the human and chimpanzee species diverged from our common ancestor...
www.nature.com
Alu elements are primate-specific repeats and comprise 11% of the human genome. They have wide-ranging influences on gene expression. Their contribution to genome evolution, gene regulation and disease is reviewed.
genomebiology.biomedcentral.com
Alu elements have inserted in primate genomes throughout the evolution of the order. One particular Alu lineage (Ye) began amplifying relatively early in hominid evolution and continued propagating at a low level as many of its members are found in a variety of hominid genomes. This study...
www.pnas.org
Let us see how MrID deals with real science...
