LOL. 😁That's what you think you know.
I accept your white flag.
LOL. 😁That's what you think you know.
I have proved it to be true without assuming it to be true.Nope. The ONLY way that you prove the Bible is true, is by assuming that it's true in the first place. You couldn't possibly choose a more biased position.
And you wrongly assumed you could derive a contradiction from our answers.in the first proof using the law of non contradiction I assumed there was no God.
Already done.And you wrongly assumed you could derive a contradiction from our answers.
But you never derived a contradiction from our answers. You just assumed you could, then never tried.Already done.
5 proofs each that God created everything, that the Bible is true and that evolution and billions of years are a lie.
I gave a lot of themBut you never derived a contradiction from our answers. You just assumed you could, then never tried.
Based on absurd assumptions. They were not derived from our answers to your questions, so you never had a legitimate RAA proof.I gave a lot of them
Sadly, your lack of understanding of logic has fooled you once again. Assuming no God contradicts nothing.I have proved it to be true without assuming it to be true.
in the first proof using the law of non contradiction I assumed there was no God.
Read the proof present a rebuttalSadly, your lack of understanding of logic has fooled you once again. Assuming no God contradicts nothing.
There's no proof. The rebuttals appears immediately after your attempt at proof. If you want to restate it here, do so, and be rebutted again. You should be used to it by now.Read the proof present a rebuttal
Please post your rebuttal here.There's no proof. The rebuttals appears immediately after your attempt at proof. If you want to restate it here, do so, and be rebutted again. You should be used to it by now.
It says "days", but after 2000 years of nothing happening, we will pretend it means "eon".An eon ... 🫠
Please post your "proof" here.Please post your rebuttal here.
Read the op in this thread. It will tell you where all the proofs are.Please post your "proof" here.
Those are Bible quotations, not proof. You are making a science claim. You need science to produce evidence. Please post your proof here.Read the op in this thread. It will tell you where all the proofs are.
I added the quotations not as part of the proof that God exists so you missed that.Those are Bible quotations, not proof. You are making a science claim. You need science to produce evidence. Please post your proof here.
No, they don't. This current obsession is no more useful to you than you previous attempts. You don't seem to realise that the stegosaurus was extinct, not just millions of years before humans evolved, but millions of years before T Rex, which in turn was extinct millions of years before humans. Science doesn't do wicked lies. It is sometimes mistaken, but works to correct those mistakes. It's never wicked, though it is sometimes put to wicked use by wicked men. If you want an example of wicked lies, look to those who exploit the gullible to steal their money. Genesis park for example.I added the quotations not as part of the proof that God exists so you missed that.
All these destroy the wicked lies of evolution and billions of years.
Ancient Dinosaur Depictions | Genesis Park
www.genesispark.com
That is why the etching proves your beloved theories hogwash.No, they don't. This current obsession is no more useful to you than you previous attempts. You don't seem to realise that the stegosaurus was extinct, not just millions of years before humans evolved, but millions of years before T Rex, which in turn was extinct millions of years before humans. Science doesn't do wicked lies. It is sometimes mistaken, but works to correct those mistakes. It's never wicked, though it is sometimes put to wicked use by wicked men. If you want an example of wicked lies, look to those who exploit the gullible to steal their money. Genesis park for example.
Except that it doesn't. It proves nothing at all.That is why the etching proves your beloved theories hogwash.
They were C-14 dated so each Dino figurine destroys evolution and billions of years.Except that it doesn't. It proves nothing at all.
Sample No. 1 | (I-3842) 3590 + - 100 (C.1640 BC) |
Sample No. 2 | (I-4015) 6480 + - 170 (C. 4530 BC) |
Sample No. 3 | (I-4031)3060 + - 120 (C. 1110 BC) |