Exact timing of the prophecies from the Bible explained.

SavedByTheLord

Well-known member
Nope. The ONLY way that you prove the Bible is true, is by assuming that it's true in the first place. You couldn't possibly choose a more biased position.
I have proved it to be true without assuming it to be true.
in the first proof using the law of non contradiction I assumed there was no God.
 

Temujin

Well-known member
I have proved it to be true without assuming it to be true.
in the first proof using the law of non contradiction I assumed there was no God.
Sadly, your lack of understanding of logic has fooled you once again. Assuming no God contradicts nothing.
 

Temujin

Well-known member
I added the quotations not as part of the proof that God exists so you missed that.

All these destroy the wicked lies of evolution and billions of years.

No, they don't. This current obsession is no more useful to you than you previous attempts. You don't seem to realise that the stegosaurus was extinct, not just millions of years before humans evolved, but millions of years before T Rex, which in turn was extinct millions of years before humans. Science doesn't do wicked lies. It is sometimes mistaken, but works to correct those mistakes. It's never wicked, though it is sometimes put to wicked use by wicked men. If you want an example of wicked lies, look to those who exploit the gullible to steal their money. Genesis park for example.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-known member
No, they don't. This current obsession is no more useful to you than you previous attempts. You don't seem to realise that the stegosaurus was extinct, not just millions of years before humans evolved, but millions of years before T Rex, which in turn was extinct millions of years before humans. Science doesn't do wicked lies. It is sometimes mistaken, but works to correct those mistakes. It's never wicked, though it is sometimes put to wicked use by wicked men. If you want an example of wicked lies, look to those who exploit the gullible to steal their money. Genesis park for example.
That is why the etching proves your beloved theories hogwash.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-known member
Except that it doesn't. It proves nothing at all.
They were C-14 dated so each Dino figurine destroys evolution and billions of years.

Hapgood submitted the samples to the Laboratory of Isotopes Inc. in New Jersey. The results were as follows:


Sample No. 1(I-3842) 3590 + - 100 (C.1640 BC)
Sample No. 2(I-4015) 6480 + - 170 (C. 4530 BC)
Sample No. 3(I-4031)3060 + - 120 (C. 1110 BC)
The Stegosaurus clobbers evolution and billions of years too.
You are correct about Camboia but defeated of course.

historydaily.org

Did Ancient Man See Dinosaurs? These Carvings and Artifacts Say Maybe

What the farmer uncovered was an amazing collection of pieces, many of which appeared to be dinosaurs. If authentic, the figurines seemed to show that ancient people living in what is now Mexico had knowledge of a wide range of dinosaur species.
historydaily.org
historydaily.org
But it is all over the world.

Ancient Dinosaur Depictions | Genesis Park


www.genesispark.com
www.genesispark.com
 
Top