You are funny... white people call grown black men "boy" all the time and you take offense to being called a white boy.
It is true that whites have called black men "boy", which has been deemed racist and condemned by the white community. And when it happens in movies, it is said by someone who is portrayed as a racist. When 'white boy', 'white man', 'cracker', is said by someone in the black entertainment business the character could range from a villain to a positive role model. When used by a positive role model no one in the black entertainment business calls it wrong. Must be that Black Privilege.
It was the other way around for hundreds of years. That is one way of trying to level the playing field. But now you know what blacks felt like when it was always the white person getting the job.
You don't level the playing field by punishing the ones that had nothing to do with what happened hundreds of years back. The playing field is leveled by drawing a line in the sand and insisting on equal opportunity and not equal results. Diversity over qualifications is not the way to go. Look at the vice president. She is not qualified to be VP. She was chosen because of inclusiveness, she is a woman and she is black. When the playing field is level everyone brings their A-game. Michael Jordan was not chosen to play professional ball because someone gave him extra points because he was black. No, he was chosen because he was better than the other players. After 61 years I believe the playing field is level. What I do notice is that some supporters of affirmative action believe it should be kept because the black community is not on par with other ethnic communities. And then they show up with solutions to help the black community in order to take control. "Sorry but you are not smart enough to handle this. I would help you."
Whys should any white applicant, who is the most qualified not get the job because of his skin color. We call that racism and you support it.
Those claims have been shut down...There are video proofs of instigators committing the crimes. There are even reports of a black FBI agent who was beaten and arrested for no reason by cops while his white undercover partner was allowed to go free.
I will have to go over the Capital Protest films because I did not see 'White Lives Matter", 'Proud Boys', '3 Percenters','the Klan' and 'Nazis' present at the capital burning, looting, or murdering. What I did see was BLM and its supporters burning, looting, and murder 250+times.
And your point is? Do you want to set a precedent for breaching the capital? You are against protest for the killing of unarmed black men but you are Ok with breaching the capitol building because Trump lost the election?
I am not against any peaceful protest over the murder of any man. I am against burning, looting, and murdering being passed off as peaceful protests. Notice that the ones arrested during the 250+ peaceful protest were released and charges dropped even the ones whose actions resulted in burning, looting, and murdering, but the ones that entered the Capital are still in jail. Notice the difference, the 2020's peaceful protest cost approx 2 Billion in damages [mostly black comunities] compared to the capital where some doors and windows were broken. Inside no picture or statue was damaged, no graffiti was painted, no burning or looting. Why were the ones that burn, looted, and murdered in black communities released and the ones that breached the capitals remain in jail?
I have a hypothesis and note it has to do with the value of X, and who values it.
Pelosi and the Democrats value the Capital building as sacred, they said so. As Democrats this makes sense. The Capital was built by slave labor, a bastion of white supremacy, so any violation of this sacred building must be met with harsh and swift punishment. Why were the ones that desecrated black communities not punished with similar severity? The punishment always reflects the value of the offended.
But i guess it's OK with you for the ones arrested during the capital protest to stay in jail. Why? Because they are white?
white men,
white men
white men
white men
white men
white men
white men
Showing your true racist side aren't you? Instead of placing the guilt on the ones that committed the offense you place the guilt on a race. Did you forget that approx 300K white men in the Union Army died fighting against the Confederacy which was controlled by the Democratic Party? If not for them slavery would have continued. Rather hypocritical of you to argue against blacks being lumped into one category but you lump whites into one and blame the race as a whole when blame can be placed on a specific group. You undermine the very moral standard you are using to denounce racism by practicing racism.
Funny how you want to hide behind a political party. I don't care if it was Democrats or Republicans when election was over they all got together to get rich off the back of black men.
Of course, you don't care, and this is typical of race hustling. It is easy to focus blame on an ambiguous target [whiteness], it is harder when the target is specific [Deomocrats], and it is even harder when you find out you have been supporting that very target.
Yes, they are not white men looking to get rich off the back of anyone, Do any white people benefit from the Obama health care plan? I guess not. Trump's goal was to completely remove it. In his view, too many black people were getting assistance.
If the Nazis decided to champion Jewish issues would the Jews join the Nazi party = after the persecution, enslavement, and murder of 6 million-plus Jews? No. Why would any black person support or join the Democratic party who owned approx 4 million slaves in 1860, and persecuted, lynched, and beat the black community when it could for the next 100 years? Makes one question, Obama, Harris, Booker, and any other black Democrat.
You claimed to have read the rules. You should be telling me which of the rules fixed the massive voter fraud. The reason for the new rules was to fix the voter fraud problem was it not? Show me the voter fraud problem that was fixed...
You cannot see them because they don't affect you.
So you are saying that you have evidence of this as voter fraud...Why is not anyone being arrested for the fraud?
Which you must do in order to register to vote. I guess your buddy will not be able to vote for his dead mom again. For which he got probation..
Every person has a right to vote.
that is already on the books. Why are there not more ballot boxes?
You are becoming the king of the red herrings. The topic is new voting laws or rules that disenfranchise blacks which you claim exists but for the 7th request cannot produce one. And no one has.
strawman...they are claiming massive voter fraud as the cause for the new rules.
You don't know what a straw man is. Some are claiming voter fraud and some are not. So what? If the laws do not disenfranchise blacks or anybody else why should anyone care?
You made a claim sir I asked for numbers to support your claim.
What numbers. You don't prove X occurred by citing a number. Anyhow I will be fair when you show me a new unjust voter law or rule and I will research the 'numbers' for you.
Your assumptions based on your ignorance have nothing to do with what I am for or against. You or anyone else with evidence of voter fraud should present that evidence to the American people. If Trump had won the election there would be no new rules.
Why can't you answer the question? Are you against voter fraud or are you against voter fraud that does not benefit what you support?
What is true ignorance is the delusion that you champion against racism when in fact you practice racism. ,