Why do you say they "are disobeying"? Where are they killing anyone now?Secondly, the Catholics church tortured and killed MILLIONS in the Name of Christ which is breaking the commandment "Do not kill." Jesus tells us to LOVE our enemies and let the wheat and tares grow together until the harvest which Catholics are disobeying too.
This is false. They no longer sell them, and it is quite difficult to even get one. Ironically, they have discovered that they were letting them go to freely so they decided to be stingy about it to generate more value for them. Regardless, it is not a financial or monetary value that they have placed upon them.Thirdly, Catholics also sell the kingdom of heaven for money which they call "indulgences"which are still practiced today.
Catholics have OMITTED the 2nd Commandment because of their contempt for God. So they KNOW they're BREAKING that Commandment or they wouldn't try to erase it.
This is also patently false. I know of no Catholics who believe or know that they are breaking the second commandment. Furthermore, the fact that they don't know this is forgiven through Christ's sacrifice.
And lastly, 1 Co. 6:9-10 tells us that ALL UNREPENTANT idolaters will NOT enter heaven. Rev. 21:8 also says the same thing.
Thats just the tip of the iceberg of the verses that Catholics DISOBEY.
Again, no one can repent if they don't know they have sinned. While this is most definitely sin, it is covered by Christ's sacrifice due to the fact that unintentional or mistaken sin is the only remedied by sacrifice. Christ points this out from the cross when he says: "Father forgive them for they know not what they do".
While I agree with your conclusion that the Catholic church is not the church Christ instituted, they have not supported civil marriages, but "civil unions"; big difference. Gay marriage is a misnomer, and it is remarkable that the Catholic church has picked up on this fact.So they are NOT the church. They've made up their own religion which now includes homosexuality since the pope has recently supported civil marriage between two men or two women.
It is even more remarkable that no one from the LGBQ etc. has called them on their distinction, or rather their reluctance to support gay marriage.