Bob Carabbio
Well-known member
Except that you said the opposite, but obviously cant see it.It is almost as if you repeated what I said while accusing me of saying the opposite.
Except that you said the opposite, but obviously cant see it.It is almost as if you repeated what I said while accusing me of saying the opposite.
necessary as evidence:
"The third-cause fallacy (also known as ignoring a common cause or questionable cause)
is a logical fallacy where a spurious relationship is confused for causation.
It asserts that X causes Y when, in reality, X and Y are both caused by Z.
It is a variation on the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy and a member of the questionable cause group of fallacies."
Correlation does not imply causation - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Z= faith
X = works
Y= salvation
Except that you said the opposite, but obviously cant see it.
Do you believe there is a case where there is faith without works?
As Spurgeon once said: "Any FAITH that doesn't CHANGE a person - won't save them either". And it was Philip Melancthon that said "It is Faith ALONE that saves - but the Faith that saves will never be alone".Please gain some form of reading comprehension and then an understanding of prepositional logic and then re-read my posts.
Given the high probability of failure of you achieving the first part answer me this: Can somebody have faith without works?
immediately after accepting the God-given gift of a saving faithDo you believe there is a case where there is faith without works?
Death bed conversions:
someone poorly discipled
I would condemn any of those I found.However I have encountered faith aloners who want to preach and teach the case where works don't exist in a person's life and faith does exist.
As Spurgeon once said: "Any FAITH that doesn't CHANGE a person - won't save them either". And it was Philip Melancthon that said "It is Faith ALONE that saves - but the Faith that saves will never be alone".
SInce "Works" Are the inevitable PRODUCT of FAITH, then the answer would be "NO". The "Works" however CONTRIBUTE NOTHING to Salvation, but are simply the normal RESULT of Biblical Faith.
~90% of what "Religious people" CALL "FAITH" isn't FAITH at all - just "Religious hot air".
Context:Theo will be along to condemn you now. . . . or he wont as he says below. The book of James doesn't acknowledge such a case as having faith.
Verse 24 means they will not be judged unto condemnation:CONTEXT: try it !
Same book : same chapter ; just 4 verses earlier
all men will NOT be judged!!
24 “Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life
all men will NOT be judged!!
Then handle 1 Cor 3:15Well now that you are caught up to the class, can you dispense with accusing me of saying the opposite?
Read the verse you posted and answerVerse 24 means they will not be judged unto condemnation:
John 5:24---King James Version
24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life
Then handle 1 Cor 3:15
Context:
I have read Theo's comments:
we are in agreement:
He was talking about people claiming to have faith and having no desire to do works:
I was discussing deathbed conversions and the moments after coming to faith
The Thief on the Cross did not have an opportunity for work prior to his death
I came to a saving faith. alone, in my room, at night: i did not do any works until later
The logical cases were identical, a case where there is faith without works.
A deathbed confession is pragmatic faithlessness. Don't get me wrong, I wish for them to be in the kingdom, but I would have grave doubts about affirming they would be.
The thief was right there beside Christ on the cross suffering with him and proclaiming him and encouraging our Lord at his darkest hour despite his own personal pain and humiliation. He wasn't there because he wanted to be, but being there did pretty well with what he had.
You may have have had a faith that saves, you may have not. All we can say is that you have made a choice at that moment and stuck to it. As Luther and others stated, the faith that saves is never alone.
now lets get straight to the point: with a clear answer from you
Are works salvific?
and there we go : the logical fallacy you said nobody has assertedThere is no salvific efficacy in works without faith. (as stated more than once in this thread)
There is no salvific efficacy in faith without works (as this is a logically impossible case. The faith that saves is never alone.)
when, in reality, works and salvation are both caused by FAITHThere is no salvific efficacy in faith without works (as this is a logically impossible case. The faith that saves is never alone.)
and there we go : the logical fallacy you said nobody has asserted
"The third-cause fallacy (also known as ignoring a common cause or questionable cause)
is a logical fallacy where a spurious relationship is confused for causation.
It asserts that X causes Y when, in reality, X and Y are both caused by Z.
It is a variation on the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy and a member of the questionable cause group of fallacies."
Correlation does not imply causation - Wikipedia
Z= faith
X = works
Y= salvation
well let's test thatI've not asserted that X causes Y. Your claim that this is a fallacy committed by me is just you making stuff up for whatever reasons that drove you to it.
I've only spoken of presence. The faith that saves is never alone. You posts comes you wishing that to find ways for that statement to be false.
Nor is any other denomination.Mormonism isn't Christian--not by a long shot.
The Savior testified all men will be judged--after death--and that for life or damnation: