Dr. Anthony Fauci sat down with “Meta” CEO Mark Zuckerberg and finally said out loud what many people have been warning for over a year about the rushed mRNA vaccines: They may actually make the Covid pandemic worse. https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/fauci-admits-covid-vaccines-may-make-people-worse/
Fauci admits COVID vaccines may actually make people 'WORSE'!
- Thread starter ferengi
- Start date
Thistle
Well-known member
So I'm a little confused. Is this one of those instances where we're supposed to believe Fauci?
LOL- only if you believe atheists are honest - then go ahead
Son Of Saxon
Active member
I have the video but can't upload it
Whateverman
Well-known member
Whirled Nut Daily
Lol
Lol
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
In the science study done by Gervais, atheeists were found to be less trustworthy than rapists. Is there a pattern?
Whateverman
Well-known member
deleted
Poisoning the well fallacy
Whateverman
Well-known member
Their (and your) lack of credibility is no fallacy.
Keep at your fake news addiction; one of these days, it's sure to get something right...
Your unsupported assertions have no credibility.
Bonnie
Super Member
Clip was taken out of context:
It is always important to take context into consideration. This clip is from March 2020 before there were any vaccines. Not recent at all. So Fauci never said covid vaccines would make people worse. Read the transcript in the link.
It is always important to take context into consideration. This clip is from March 2020 before there were any vaccines. Not recent at all. So Fauci never said covid vaccines would make people worse. Read the transcript in the link.
Last edited:
Thistle
Well-known member
This citation takes on new significance now that we have a poor vaccine track record to compare to the expectations originally set. The suggestion that the timing of the comments make them irrelevant to the circumstances at hand completely fails. Either Fauci was telling the truth or he was not. If the answer is Fauci was not telling the truth, then there's no reason to believe anything else he says. If he was telling the truth, then it's still the truth, and it seems all the more germain now that we have the bad track record to compare to the original expectations. The suggestion that these observations are not relevant is really the worst kind of engineered pragmatic spin imaginable.
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Gotta whitewash the Faucheese.
Just a reminder, the Clot shot is not a vaccine. Discredited medical outsider talking points show a hard left political bias.
Classic case when felons tell stories that don't match just like atheeist Fauchee.
Think like a leftist. Believe what he says when it fits the agenda and claim it's "out of context" when it doesn't.
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Which of his assorted mismatched mask stories are "true"???
Bonnie
Super Member
The clip takes on no new significance. The vaccine never caused ADE, which is an acute reaction. Not something that happens months after getting the shot.
WND dishonestly took the clip out of context. Fauci said no such thing.
I love how everything that disagrees with the narrative is "taken out of context" lol. Hilarious. It's that or "crazy source".
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Classic Modus Operandi.
Left wingeranity.
Do you remember how animated the left was all about Project Veritas claiming their PP videos were "edited"?
Now Project Veritas is exposing another pedophile at CNN. Cesspool News Network.
They must smear Project Veritas.
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
You just got a "like" from a Fake News advocate.
Harry Leggs
Super Member
They are all indemnified anyway from vaxx damages via the federal government. Makes us wonder why billionaires and their auxiliaries, right down to the person administering the jab, (Are we on the third or fourth in one year?) would require liability protection if the jabs are so protective and effective?
Kim Potter is not receiving any indemnity for accidentally shooting and killing Daunte Wright. Yet billionaire big pharma types are and they wonder why we a jab skeptical? If it is so safe and effective then why not remove liability protection? How hard could that be? And three possibly four jabs in one year? What a joke.
Last edited: