I watched the initial page. That "Project Veritas" label in the top left told me all I need to know about the video.If you refuse to watch… DO NO COMMENT!
Willful ignorance is feigned ignorance.I watched the initial page. That "Project Veritas" label in the top left told me all I need to know about the video.
I am well informed of the reliability of Project Veritas' previous efforts. They lie. If you have some thing from a different, more reliable source, that does not just copy the Project Veritas piece, then I will look at it.Willful ignorance is feigned ignorance.
Stick your head in the sand, but do not feign ignorance. You’ve been informed and have instead choosen to be in a state of DENIAL.
So you only believe whistleblowers when they are leftists I see. Not very interesting.I watched the initial page. That "Project Veritas" label in the top left told me all I need to know about the video.
I do not believe boys who cry "Wolf!" and have been found to have been lying or exaggerating.So you only believe whistleblowers when they are leftists I see. Not very interesting.
So you only believe whistleblowers when they are leftists I see. Not very interesting.I do not believe boys who cry "Wolf!" and have been found to have been lying or exaggerating.
You need a more reliable source.
No. I only believe people who tell the truth, not proven liars.So you only believe whistleblowers when they are leftists I see. Not very interesting.
Why wont you watch the video first… and then determine if you think they’re lying or not?I am well informed of the reliability of Project Veritas' previous efforts. They lie. If you have some thing from a different, more reliable source, that does not just copy the Project Veritas piece, then I will look at it.
You are the one visiting a river in Egypt if you think that Project Veritas can be relied on.
These people show their true colors more and more each day.So you only believe whistleblowers when they are leftists I see. Not very interesting.
Since you choose to distract from the message. At least back up your claim against the messenger.I do not believe boys who cry "Wolf!" and have been found to have been lying or exaggerating.
You need a more reliable source.
Rossum is correct in stating that PV is not just an unreliable source, but has trafficked in doctored videos to make their cases.Why wont you watch the video first… and then determine if you think they’re lying or not?
I am well informed of the reliability of Project Veritas' previous efforts.
They expose lies. Buddha was exposed as a liar.They lie.
You offer no evidence. Do you know why you hate investigation?If you have some thing from a different, more reliable source, that does not just copy the Project Veritas piece, then I will look at it.
You are the one visiting a river in Egypt if you think that Project Veritas can be relied on.
offWe’ve been trying to tell you for years.
You can no longer feign ignorance.
You can no longer plausibly deny.
There’s is just TOO MUCH evidence that THE US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED HUMAN TRAFFICKING. And you/we are paying for it!
If you say nothing… it will not stop.
If you ignore… it will not stop.
Human Experiments?
Organ Harvesting?
Sex Trafficking?
All
Of
The
Above???
You don't get to tell me the rules for posting.If you refuse to watch… DO NO COMMENT!
No.Willful ignorance is feigned ignorance.
That is a problem with the left. When I get a news source I look to check it out from other news sources whereas you guys merely dismiss it.I watched the initial page. That "Project Veritas" label in the top left told me all I need to know about the video.
Then check out other news sources and tell us what they say about this story. Until someone does so it remains in the "Man eaten by hamster! Elvis is witness! " category of journalism.That is a problem with the left. When I get a news source I look to check it out from other news sources whereas you guys merely dismiss it.
If I get an article from the Daily Mail I check it out against the Telegraph AND the Guardian
That is part of the problem here. We have only been supplied with one single source; there are no other sources to check it against. I have repeatedly asked for alternative sources, see posts #5, 7, 9, but none have been provided.That is a problem with the left. When I get a news source I look to check it out from other news sources whereas you guys merely dismiss it.
If I get an article from the Daily Mail I check it out against the Telegraph AND the Guardian