Fox News

BMS

Well-known member
Notice once you trapped him/her to answer the actual question you asked, or maybe for Temujin it is he/she, they/them, zee/za, her/him etc., I don't want to offend, all of a sudden Temujin has a life?
Yes, sadly Temujin is the only one who cant see a question if he cant answer it without compromising his position
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mik

Temujin

Well-known member
So I can find it, but we discussed it only a few months ago and I have a life to lead so you will need to either recall it or google it.

I was pointing you to your nonsense, which you cant recall.
It is.
how would you know? If you have a point make it
Address the question or shut up.
here you go.
What. Is. Your. Question?

There is no point in lambasting me for not answering something you are not asking coherently. Why are you showing us a report from the Daily Mail? Are you seriously asking me to comment on a video that was apparently available for 2 days ten months ago? I haven't seen it. I have no idea what was in it, and neither do you. You are just jerking to the dog whistle being blown by the Daily Fail. Find me the video and I'll watch it and comment. Alternatively ask me a question about the BBC which doesn't involve commenting on a video neither of us have seen.
 

BMS

Well-known member
What. Is. Your. Question?

There is no point in lambasting me for not answering something you are not asking coherently. Why are you showing us a report from the Daily Mail? Are you seriously asking me to comment on a video that was apparently available for 2 days ten months ago? I haven't seen it. I have no idea what was in it, and neither do you. You are just jerking to the dog whistle being blown by the Daily Fail. Find me the video and I'll watch it and comment. Alternatively ask me a question about the BBC which doesn't involve commenting on a video neither of us have seen.
So it is an example of how subjective reputable media might be. The BBC indoctrinating children with falsehood. So what you might think is reputable may infact be reprehensible
 

Temujin

Well-known member
So it is an example of how subjective reputable media might be. The BBC indoctrinating children with falsehood. So what you might think is reputable may infact be reprehensible
How can you possibly say that? How is a video supposedly withdrawn after two days, reported by a disreputable rag like the Daily Mail, a slur on the reputation of the BBC? You are talking nonsense based on third hand, biased reporting of a non-event.
 

BMS

Well-known member
How can you possibly say that? How is a video supposedly withdrawn after two days, reported by a disreputable rag like the Daily Mail, a slur on the reputation of the BBC? You are talking nonsense based on third hand, biased reporting of a non-event.
The 'teaching' material was withrawn after about a year. It was reported by several newspapers including the Times and even the Guardian if I recall correctly. That and the Stephen Nolan report are examples of how the BBC has been corrupted.
The BBC also went for a 13% equality of outcome quota when the % of the population was at 1-6%.

So once again your claims are exposed as flawed. Reframe your worldview from woke to sane
 
Top