You agreed to the statement that transwomen are men and pages later said some are women. No falsehood there, and that is what I pointed out.More falsehoods. What you say is untrue, both regard g my position and the position of trans issues, which have nothing to do with abortion.
And the gender identity ideology does deny the biological sex, its observable reality when the male sex is allowed into the female sex space under the banner of 'gender' That is exactly what it does. That is exactly what it does when a lesbian by definition isn't attracted to a 'transwoman' because he is biologically a man and lesbians who are biologically women are attracted to other biological women.
Your ideology doesnt work
Its controversial, and in the light of your previous claim that there is no issue and the matter was settled. This was just July this year, so its not settled and remains controversial. Indeed more than 800 medical professionals urged the withdrawal of the amendment. And a poll at the time found that only 1% of women wanted to see the time limit for abortion extended above 24 weeks and only 1% of women wanted to see the time limit for abortion extended through to birth. The same poll found that 70% of women wanted to see the abortion time limit reduced to 20 weeks or below. The poll also found that 91% of women favour a total and explicit ban on sex-selective abortion.What about it?
How does that fit with your position that the foetus doesn't have any rights? If for you the foetus doesn't have any rights why not have abortion up to birth?
Here is more of the waffle that no- one disputesThe concept of zero was invented 2000 years ago and is currently taught in primary school. The number two is greater than and different from zero.
what rights, does a foetus without any rights, have?If A has some rights and B has zero rights, then B has different rights from A.
Once again what you say is nonsense.