organgrinder
Super Member
So you got nothing but assumptions. No facts. Thought so.
God promised to preserve His words believers believed they have it
- Thread starter J316
- Start date
Leatherneck0311
Well-known member
Think anything you want to no problem.
organgrinder
Super Member
Until proven otherwise, yes.
No evidence, textual or biblical or historical, can support KJVO!
And how does this apply to only one translation?
How many should there be?
Wrong question
Show me where the Bible says anything about translations. Otherwise admitt this is just speculation.
Psalm 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
So again you imply the words coming out of Gods mouth are impure
And the purification clause is attached to silver, not Gods word. The KJVO has to attack God to bolster KJVOism
And your interpretation of Psalm 12:7 contradicts that, so you are wrong. Thanks for admitting that
Proving God's word does not need purification
7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
Referring to people
1 Thessalonians 2:13 For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.
Nothing to do with a particular translation
That verse does not teach or support KJV-onlyism.
Inconsistent KJV-only reasoning/teaching suggests that some of God's words in the original languages passed away, and supposedly had to be restored from the Latin Vulgate and in the 1611 KJV.