God promised to preserve His words believers believed they have it

[logos1560]

The KJV maintains the truth of the one true door without bias , alterations, and removal of the foundations unlike MV’s which are forwarded by those with an agenda to destroy the foundations and truth of God.

You fail to prove your biased, subjective opinions to be true. Your unproven allegations bear false witness against the translators of the NKJV.

You also ignore the fact that there was Church of England bias involved in some of the translation decisions in the KJV.

 

[YeshuaFan]

I go against men following men who have an agenda against God’s word.

Did the team hold that the Kjv was Kjvo or not?

 

[YeshuaFan]

I know the drill only those who push the minority text consider themselves right. Carry on.

We hold that one can be preferring the Critical greek tet, majority Text, even the TR one, but one cannot be Only in either Greek texts or English translations!

 

[YeshuaFan]

Lol, OK whatever floats your deluded beliefs. Carry on.

Do you think that the Kjv always followed TR text, and that did not add or subtract at all?

 

[YeshuaFan]

You don't even know enough about the text of the KJV bible to have a discussion. All you can do is repeat the lies of KJVOnly. Why not study the text of the KJV itself? It's a great version worthy of your study. Then you could tell when KJVOnly lies to you. You would know the truth for yourself.

Few Kjvo have any understanding of what goes on in field of textual criticism, other then if not TR/Kjv, no good!

 

[robycop3]

The KJV maintains the truth of the one true door without bias , alterations, and removal of the foundations unlike MV’s which are forwarded by those with an agenda to destroy the foundations and truth of God.

The KJV is full of goofs & booboos, such as "Easter" in Acts 12:4, "the love of money is THE root of ALL evil" in 1 Tim. 6:10, & the words "and shalt be" in Rev. 16:5, which are NOT found in any known ancient manuscript of Revelation. And this is but a short list. (Notwithstanding the KJV isn't in our common language, but is an outdated, archaic form.)

 

[Leatherneck0311]

So then, you should be against KJVOs; they're men following men, as the KJVO myth isn't even in the KJV itself, & those men have an agenda against God's word in other valid versions except their own pet.

The KJV is full of goofs & booboos, such as "Easter" in Acts 12:4, "the love of money is THE root of ALL evil" in 1 Tim. 6:10, & the words "and shalt be" in Rev. 16:5, which are NOT found in any known ancient manuscript of Revelation. And this is but a short list. (Notwithstanding the KJV isn't in our common language, but is an outdated, archaic form.)

You use ancient instead of minority interesting.

 

[Leatherneck0311]

We hold that one can be preferring the Critical greek tet, majority Text, even the TR one, but one cannot be Only in either Greek texts or English translations!

Can one trust God’s word to even God’s word based on todays lack of conviction ?

 

[Leatherneck0311]

Few Kjvo have any understanding of what goes on in field of textual criticism, other then if not TR/Kjv, no good!

So you believe God needs textual criticism to get His word out ? I do not.

 

[Leatherneck0311]

Do you think that the Kjv always followed TR text, and that did not add or subtract at all?

I trust the KJV I do not trust the minority text.

 

[YeshuaFan]

KJV-only advocates seem to have an agenda against a consistent, just application of the truths of God's word. They seem to reject the preserved original-language words of Scriptures as being the standard and greater authority for the making and trying of all Bible translations including the KJV. They contradict scripture by implying that the word of God is bound to the textual criticism decisions, Bible revision decisions, and translation decisions of one exclusive group of Church of England critics in 1611 when it is not bound. They contradict scripture and suggest that God shows partiality to English-speaking believers after 1611 when the wisdom from God above is without partiality. They contradict scripture and apply divers measures [double standards], an abomination to the LORD. They contradict scripture by trying to make a tradition of men into a doctrine of God. They disobecannot even

y scripture by bearing false witness against believers who disagree with human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning. KJV-only advocates advocate and follow the opinions of men.

Can one trust God’s word to even God’s word based on todays lack of conviction ?

yes, do you attest then that we need a perfect translation to have the word of God to us for today? Did God promise that to His originals and translations?

 

[YeshuaFan]

So you believe God needs textual criticism to get His word out ? I do not.

So the Kjv translators did not use any textual criticism, just had the Holy Spirit inspire and reveal to them directly the kjv?

 

[YeshuaFan]

I trust the KJV I do not trust the minority text.

Please answer the question!

 

[Leatherneck0311]

yes, do you attest then that we need a perfect translation to have the word of God to us for today? Did God promise that to His originals and translations?

So the Kjv translators did not use any textual criticism, just had the Holy Spirit inspire and reveal to them directly the kjv?

A word for word translation like the KJV did not use nor accept the high and mighty opinions of the translators they left that nonsense to the watered down and non committed future generations.

 

[Leatherneck0311]

So the Kjv translators did not use any textual criticism, just had the Holy Spirit inspire and reveal to them directly the kjv?

The KJV translators used the best )manu scripts ( majority texts ) not their self elevated positions as knowing more than God.

 

[Leatherneck0311]

yes, do you attest then that we need a perfect translation to have the word of God to us for today? Did God promise that to His originals and translations?

He promised to preserve His word did He not ?

 

[glenlogie]

He promised to preserve His word did He not ?

But according to you, it did not happen until 1611.

 

[YeshuaFan]

A word for word translation like the KJV did not use nor accept the high and mighty opinions of the translators they left that nonsense to the watered down and non committed future generations.

The Kjv is NOT a full word for word, as they added some words, subtracted some, and brought over some from latin Vulgate even!

 

[YeshuaFan]

The KJV translators used the best )manu scripts ( majority texts ) not their self elevated positions as knowing more than God.

They used what was available to them at the time period!

 

[YeshuaFan]

He promised to preserve His word did He not ?

He did, in the Hebrew and Greek texts!