I thought I did. I'm not interested in arguing about this with you anymore.
"I know that <Paris is the capital of France>, but I do not believe that <Paris is the capital of France>."
^This is drivel - is there any fact you could put into the <>, where it would not be drivel?
Because this is what's required for your "it is possible to know, without believing" to be true.
Very odd disagreement here, a Christian insisting that "knowledge comes before belief".
Of course he is wrong, but how does belief before knowledge help atheism be a viable position?