G
guest1
Guest
Now off to some real studying scripture tonight in our small group on discipleship.
Don’t ever quote BDAG again ???
Don't forget to teach your position on the mutability of God, and how you discerned that because of God's wrath disclosed at the fall. ?Now off to some real studying scripture tonight in our small group on discipleship.
My pastor loved my paper on psalm 22 and stands behind me .Don't forget to teach your position on the mutability of God, and how you discerned that because of God's wrath disclosed at the fall. ?
Don't forget to teach your position on the mutability of God, and how you discerned that because of God's wrath disclosed at the fall. ?My pastor loved my paper on psalm 22 and stands behind me .
oops
Is that your Calvinist pastor, or your Arminian pastor?My pastor loved my paper on psalm 22 and stands behind me .
oops
Jealous for the Son, not Jealous of the Son; etc...No why would the Son be jealous of the Father or the Holy Spirit with the Son or the Father ?
Innate/ Incommunicable attributes are who God is within His own nature/Being as Triune. They have nothing to do with His communicable attributes that relate to the fall, sin and man.
Is he saying wrath cannot be a attribute of God because it could not be expressed within the Trinity before creation???Don't forget to teach your position on the mutability of God, and how you discerned that because of God's wrath disclosed at the fall. ?
Is he saying wrath cannot be a attribute of God because it could not be expressed within the Trinity before creation???
Yes, and that wrath was a new emotion, if you will, for God when man sinned, which means God is mutable.Is he saying wrath cannot be a attribute of God because it could not be expressed within the Trinity before creation???
This is what happens when Fundamentals are Pitted against one another. It's how I debate; let the Fundamentals do all the heavy-lifting. This either produces change, or Cognitive Dissonance. Producing Cognitive Dissonance isn't that bad though, because one day something will have to give...Yes, and that wrath was a new emotion, if you will, for God when man sinned, which means God is mutable.
I told @Chalcedon he ought to just admit he was wrong and move on, but that was ignored and met with Chalcedon stuttering, stammering, rewording and doubling down.
Did you watch the video from DA Carson I linked yesterday ?This is what happens when Fundamentals are Pitted against one another. It's how I debate; let the Fundamentals do all the heavy-lifting. This either produces change, or Cognitive Dissonance. Producing Cognitive Dissonance isn't that bad though, because one day something will have to give...
Not yet. I'm on mid-shift this week. I did read Calvinist comments about it. I'll probably notice their critique...Did you watch the video from DA Carson I linked yesterday ?
I added it to the post you just responded to lolNot yet. I'm on mid-shift this week. I did read Calvinist comments about it. I'll probably notice their critique...
Where's that Link?
btw many trinitarians on the Trinity forum some who have seminary degree's that only post on that forum and the language forum affirmed my view on Gods innate attributes with the thread on the attributes of God. Also the pastors and theologians I know have read what I have said on that topic and affirm my position just like DA Carson does in that video.Not yet. I'm on mid-shift this week. I did read Calvinist comments about it. I'll probably notice their critique...
Where's that Link?
This is what happens when Fundamentals are Pitted against one another. It's how I debate; let the Fundamentals do all the heavy-lifting. This either produces change, or Cognitive Dissonance. Producing Cognitive Dissonance isn't that bad though, because one day something will have to give...
My Post?Meaningless word salad... ?