H mom claim The only way to remove a fetus at 17 weeks is called "abortion."

BMS

Well-known member
Temujin. Its a only a woman who can become pregnant and only a woman who can therefore have an abortion therefore there is no.such thing as a 'pregnant person' . That implies it might not be just a woman.

Your ideology is dividing society and preventing communication.
 

Temujin

Well-known member
Temujin. Its a only a woman who can become pregnant and only a woman who can therefore have an abortion therefore there is no.such thing as a 'pregnant person' . That implies it might not be just a woman.

Your ideology is dividing society and preventing communication.
Come back when any of this has any bearing on abortion. Your hobby horse is irrelevant to the rights or otherwise of the unborn.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Come back when any of this has any bearing on abortion. Your hobby horse is irrelevant to the rights or otherwise of the unborn.
Since only a woman can be pregnant and therefore only a woman can have an abortion. How can that not be relevant to the topic of abortion?
Your 'Pregnant person' isnt therefore relevant or have any bearing in abortion.
That is why your hobbyhorse is preventing you from communicating with myself and most other posters.
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
Temujin. Its a only a woman who can become pregnant and only a woman who can therefore have an abortion therefore there is no.such thing as a 'pregnant person' . That implies it might not be just a woman.

Your ideology is dividing society and preventing communication.
Now there is no such thing as a pregnant person? Funnier and funnier.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Now there is no such thing as a pregnant person? Funnier and funnier.
Its a woman. A person can be a man, a child, a boy or a girl but none of these can be pregnant. So its a woman.
Itsnot funny, its your woke ideology denying biological sex.
So if you want to continue dividing society then off you go but I an not complying with such an ideology
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
Its a woman. A person can be a man, a child, a boy or a girl but none of these can be pregnant. So its a woman.
No, according to what YOU said, a person cannot be a woman, because there is no such thing as a pregnant person. According to YOU.
Itsnot funny, its your woke ideology denying biological sex.
Don't try to blame inanities like "there is no such thing as a pregnant person" on anybody else. That's all YOU.
So if you want to continue dividing society then off you go but I an not complying with such an ideology
You go with your "there is no such thing as a pregnant person" ideology. Make sure you tell every pregnant person you encounter that they don't exist.
 

BMS

Well-known member
No, according to what YOU said, a person cannot be a woman, because there is no such thing as a pregnant person. According to YOU.
No I didnt say that, you imagine everything. Only a woman can be pregnant. How can a child be a pregnant person. You imply one can when you say pregnant person rather than woman. Since a person can be a male or a child there is no such thing as a pregnant person, its specifically only a woman.

Don't try to blame inanities like "there is no such thing as a pregnant person" on anybody else. That's all YOU.
I gave the reason so either address it or keep quiet and keep your inanities to your own imagination.

You go with your "there is no such thing as a pregnant person" ideology.
There you go with your 'their you go' inanity. Address the reason I gave and keep your inanities to yourself

Make sure you tell every pregnant person you encounter that they don't exist.
I dont do 'pregnant person' so why in your wildest dreams would you be imagining me going round with your inanities?
 

BMS

Well-known member
No, according to what YOU said, a person cannot be a woman, because there is no such thing as a pregnant person. According to YOU.
Nope, I said a only a woman can be a pregnant person. There is no such thing as a pregnant person because a person includes man, woman, child, and a man or a child as a person, cannot be pregnant. Woke ideology is a lie, it doesnt work.


Happy to have a conversation with you about what exists, but I cant communicate with your imaginary world
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
No I didnt say that,
You said precisely and exactly that.

...therefore there is no.such thing as a 'pregnant person'

you imagine everything.
Yeah. I imagine you said things that I can quote you saying.

Only a woman can be pregnant.
I know it's really offensive to your conservative sensibilities, but women are people too.

How can a child be a pregnant person.
Making less and less sense now.

You imply one can when you say pregnant person rather than woman. Since a person can be a male or a child there is no such thing as a pregnant person, its specifically only a woman.
Doubling down, huh? "No such thing as a pregnant person". Classic.

I gave the reason so either address it or keep quiet and keep your inanities to your own imagination.
There is no reason for anybody to say such a blatantly false bit of nonsense.

There you go with your 'their you go' inanity. Address the reason I gave and keep your inanities to yourself
it's YOUR inanity, sunshine. "There is no such thing as a pregnant person".

I dont do 'pregnant person' so why in your wildest dreams would you be imagining me going round with your inanities?
"There is no such thing as a pregnant person" is entirely your inanity, pal. The real world recognises that women are persons and there are millions of pregnant persons.

Nope, I said a only a woman can be a pregnant person.
Wait, now women are persons? So there are pregnant persons?

There is no such thing as a pregnant person
Oh...nope, back to this idiocy.

because a person includes man, woman, child, and a man or a child as a person, cannot be pregnant.
Person includes women, showing that (what everybody else knows) of course there are pregnant persons.

Woke ideology is a lie, it doesnt work.
It becomes increasingly obvious that you don't even know what this 'ideology' you protest against is. All we're talking about now is your failure to understand the English language.

Happy to have a conversation with you about what exists, but I cant communicate with your imaginary world
Since I don't have an imaginary world, irrelevant. We could talk about your imaginary world in which nobody is ever pregnant, if you like.
 

BMS

Well-known member
You said precisely and exactly that.
No I didnt. Show me

I know it's really offensive to your conservative sensibilities, but women are people too.
You are confused as to what a woman is, so you are in no position to give any advice to other people.

Doubling down, huh? "No such thing as a pregnant person". Classic.
For the reason given which you may comment on if you wise, otherwise keep quiet

Person includes women, showing that (what everybody else knows) of course there are pregnant persons.
Person includes women, pregnancy is exclusive to women. So you will need to say woman
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
Since only a woman can be pregnant and therefore only a woman can have an abortion. How can that not be relevant to the topic of abortion?
Your 'Pregnant person' isnt therefore relevant or have any bearing in abortion.
That is why your hobbyhorse is preventing you from communicating with myself and most other posters.
They also say "terminate" the pregnancy instead of killing the baby.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Just seen news that BPAS, the UK equivalent of Planned Parenthood I think, have sent abortion pills to a woman at 28 weeks.

But mistake though it might be, they seem not bothered, arguing for abortion up to birth.

Deranged
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
No I didnt. Show me
I already did Several times. Here it is again:
... there is no such thing as a pregnant person
You are confused as to what a woman is, so you are in no position to give any advice to other people.
You don't think anyone can ever be pregnant, so you are in no position to give any advice to other people.
For the reason given which you may comment on if you wise, otherwise keep quiet
Once again, don't try to blame your obviously false statement on me. YOU said it. Not me.

And you don't get to tell me to keep quiet.
Person includes women, pregnancy is exclusive to women. So you will need to say woman
But you've already said that there is no such thing as a pregnant person. Since 'person' includes women, there are no pregnant women. Again, this is what YOU are saying, sunshine. Don't try to blame anybody else.
 

BMS

Well-known member
I already did Several times. Here it is again:


You don't think anyone can ever be pregnant, so you are in no position to give any advice to other people.

Once again, don't try to blame your obviously false statement on me. YOU said it. Not me.

And you don't get to tell me to keep quiet.

But you've already said that there is no such thing as a pregnant person. Since 'person' includes women, there are no pregnant women. Again, this is what YOU are saying, sunshine. Don't try to blame anybody else.
Only women can be pregnant and you said I dont think anyone can ever be pregnant. Doesnt make sence. Only women can be pregnant.
Since you are confused about this and consequently cant hold a conversation about it, you are no position to give adviceto people
 

Temujin

Well-known member
Only women can be pregnant and you said I dont think anyone can ever be pregnant. Doesnt make sence. Only women can be pregnant.
Since you are confused about this and consequently cant hold a conversation about it, you are no position to give adviceto people
Gosh! Something you said doesn't make sense. (and is spelt incorrectly) In other news, water is wet.
 
Top