H mom claim The only way to remove a fetus at 17 weeks is called "abortion."
- Thread starter Authentic Nouveau
- Start date
Yes there is because disabled unborn such as with Downs can get aborted up until birth, whereas other unborn are protected after 24 weeks.
Baseless denial. Your statement was incorrect as shown.
Temujin
Well-known member
Another factually incorrect statement. Do you know what "baseless" means? When I base my denial on facts which are even included in the article you posted, then it isn't baseless. You are making yourself look silly.
Stating that something is incorrect is not showing it to be so. When it manifestly is correct, then claiming that you have shown otherwise merely shows that you are silly.
Nope. Since the unborn with Downs can be aborted up to birth whereas other unborn can only be aborted up to 24 weeks, its not equal. You claimed it was.
Maybe since the unborn has no rights, one could say its discrimination within abortion.
And the observable evidence shows you have no grasp of reality. There is discrimination against the unborn with Downs syndrome because they can be aborted up until 24 weeks whereas other unborn humans without Downs syndrome cant. And you see that as equal and the same.
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Fake news.
You are wrong again. Dilation and Extraction is technical and correct.
Medical professionals don't fall for your word games.
No nurses or docs care what pro-deather jailors babble about.
Temujin
Well-known member
Wrong. As usual. Look up the stats.
It is indeed, but not for abortion. Not all D and E are abortions, nor are all abortions D and E. You are just displaying your pitiful medical understanding gained from Google.
I'm not talking to medical professionals. I'm talking to you.
Yet you do. Reinforcing, as if there was any doubt, the fact that you have no knowledge of either nurse or doctors, except as a patient.
The fact is the unborn with Downs syndrome can be aborted up to birth, unlike other unborn humans. That discriminates against the unborn with Downs syndrome. No one needs to tell someone else Temujin, really doesnt change.
What stats are you looking at Temujin?
Temujin
Well-known member
Actually this applies to all unborn children with serious disabilities.
No it doesn't. It's impossible to discriminate against unborn children. They have no rights and cannot be a victim of anything, including discrimination. The only person in the equation is the mother. You fail to grasp this, but it's a fact. Quite a lot of what you believe is obviously wrong. This is one such thing, that happens to have been proved to be wrong by a court action and subsequent appeal. Claim your own facts as much as you like, but reality doesn't change.
Temujin
Well-known member
Medication Abortion Now Accounts for More Than Half of All US Abortions
Updated on March 2, 2022: This analysis has been updated to correct the date when the FDA allowed abortion pills to be mailed to patients for the duration of the pandemic. First published on February 24, 2022:
But not other humans without serious disabilities. So its not equal for all unborn. you said it was. It isn't. That means it is discrimination against the unborn with Downs syndrome
Well done. You need to provide evidence every time you make a claimMedication Abortion Now Accounts for More Than Half of All US Abortions
Updated on March 2, 2022: This analysis has been updated to correct the date when the FDA allowed abortion pills to be mailed to patients for the duration of the pandemic. First published on February 24, 2022:www.guttmacher.org
So you agree then, you were wrong to claim equality because its not equal for all unborn?