Temujin
Well-known member
Sounds like sour grapes to me.No. It really isn’t. It has about the same amount of credibility as your insults. All very subjective.
Sounds like sour grapes to me.No. It really isn’t. It has about the same amount of credibility as your insults. All very subjective.
We are. That is exactly what we are doingWe are not talking about saving a baby from murder.
no, you are doing that, we are talking about saving a baby from murder.We are talking about saving young women from abuse by God-bothering men.
Temijin, my dear fellow chap.😇My dear chap, I don't need advice from a neophyte like yourself, however kindly meant. You will see that the mechanics of the board provides an objective measure of how other posters see you. So much more useful than the mere navel-gazing you advocate. If you click on a posters name, you will see the number of posts they have made and the reaction score, (essentially the number of "likes). The ratio of these two numbers is a crude indication of a poster's effectiveness over time. Please get back to me when you have over hundred posts and your ratio is better than mine.
I think, if you can remember as far back as yesterday, that you were casting aspersions at the effectiveness of my posts. The purpose of communication is not to remind oneself of how clever one is, as you seem to think, but to impart a message to others such that they understand and appreciate it. Contrary to what you believe, I have had mutually satisfactory conversations with many different posters, on all sides of this and other debates. People who are by no means gullible. Nor are they preening mountebanks, who you apparently admire more, since you model yourself on them.Temijin, my dear fellow chap.😇
Let me help you. 😇
There was once a day when >many< people believed the earth was flat—so did the world become flat because many people believed the world was flat?
Similarly, how does your boasting about the number of gullible people “liking” you ease up on your personal credulity (gullibly)?
We are. That is exactly what we are doing
no, you are doing that, we are talking about saving a baby from murder.
I’m sure others, who accept your opinions without the slightest pause, eagerly embrace what you post. But how does that validate your unscientific opinions?I think, if you can remember as far back as yesterday, that you were casting aspersions at the effectiveness of my posts. The purpose of communication is not to remind oneself of how clever one is, as you seem to think, but to impart a message to others such that they understand and appreciate it. Contrary to what you believe, I have had mutually satisfactory conversations with many different posters, on all sides of this and other debates. People who are by no means gullible. Nor are they preening mountebanks, who you apparently admire more, since you model yourself on them.
Well, no, nothing you say affects my life in any way.Sounds like sour grapes to me.
I'm sure you, who cannot demonstrate the existence of any real person residing in the group you've straw-manned, will remain arrogantly self-righteous.I’m sure others, who accept your opinions without the slightest pause, eagerly embrace what you post.
Your opinions are just as "unscientific" as are his, so your question is irrelevant.But how does that validate your unscientific opinions?
We have a group of atheists here. Mao, Lenin and Stalin their ring leaders and founding fathers harvested a lot of 'likes".Unless it’s really important to you how many people like you, no one pays much attention to “likes.”
Yours are all from pro-deathers and atheeists.My dear chap, I don't need advice from a neophyte like yourself, however kindly meant. You will see that the mechanics of the board provides an objective measure of how other posters see you. So much more useful than the mere navel-gazing you advocate. If you click on a posters name, you will see the number of posts they have made and the reaction score, (essentially the number of "likes). The ratio of these two numbers is a crude indication of a poster's effectiveness over time. Please get back to me when you have over hundred posts and your ratio is better than mine.
Example of the law is a fool.Judging by what I read here, people can quite easily separate when the law is a fool, and abortion is murder.
I just looked up the first group of posts at the beginning of this thread. He and the Buddhist had their assertions removed. edit. That is not an example of Like.Similarly, how does your boasting about the number of gullible people “liking” you ease up on your personal credulity (gullibly)?
Mikey, welcome!I'm sure you, who cannot demonstrate the existence of any real person residing in the group you've straw-manned, will remain arrogantly self-righteous.
Your opinions are just as "unscientific" as are his, so your question is irrelevant
So much nonsense. A 'like' simply means someone approves of what has been posted. If this were absolutely true, my stats wouldn't be this way.Temijin, my dear fellow chap.😇
Let me help you. 😇
There was once a day when >many< people believed the earth was flat—so did the world become flat because many people believed the world was flat?
Similarly, how does your boasting about the number of gullible people “liking” you ease up on your personal credulity (gullibly)?
Exactly‼️‼️So much nonsense. A 'like' simply means someone approves of what has been posted. If this were absolutely true, my stats wouldn't be this way.
Total posts 3350
Number of likes 3632
It's not a measure of the validity of the post itself. It's much like common courtesy.
Subjective measure at best.
Sad that some folks want to turn discussion into a school-yard fight.
The only approval I need is that of my Savior.
God Speed
He can’t ‼️Doesnt address his points.
Temijin, still promoting your unfounded opinions⁉️We are not talking about saving a baby from murder. We are talking about saving young women from abuse by God-bothering men.
You havent addressed the aspersions cast on your posts, all you have done here is complain about them being made.I think, if you can remember as far back as yesterday, that you were casting aspersions at the effectiveness of my posts. The purpose of communication is not to remind oneself of how clever one is, as you seem to think, but to impart a message to others such that they understand and appreciate it. Contrary to what you believe, I have had mutually satisfactory conversations with many different posters, on all sides of this and other debates. People who are by no means gullible. Nor are they preening mountebanks, who you apparently admire more, since you model yourself on them.
Correct.He can’t ‼️
And when he does, he merely posts his opinions—of which he supports with his other opinions‼️😂🤣
Would someone say: “opinionated twaddle and tosh! (Timijin, that’s another complicated phrase that means “nonsense”)‼️
OR with the opinions of those who “like” him
That is exactly right.We have a group of atheists here. Mao, Lenin and Stalin their ring leaders and founding fathers harvested a lot of 'likes".
Now remember Easter and Jesus at the Cross didn't get very many "likes".