And you presented the fruits of that research - 43 .5 years of it - here:
A poster on another thread claims he used the scientific method to the God portrayed in the Bible exists. Because I did what every scientist has done for centuries---- I used the tools, information, materials, etc.... to follow the scientific method. the evidence I obtained has resulted in my...
forums.carm.org
I never said it was an extensive list. But to present some ideas to help get people started, yes. it is mine.
Which is to say, nothing whatsoever.
I wasn't looking for your approval, nor your permission.
I have done mine. I also found zero scientific evidence for God.
Curious how that works.
Let's say I want to corroborate previous work done to know the quantum properties of H2O, I have to use those project's papers to corroborate the process I'm using.
As I recall, if I don't use the same procedures those previous investigations used, I'm not going to corroborate their work. At best, I may learn things they did not care to learn in their work. The issue here is that I am interested in corroborating their claims. To ensure that what they're claiming is in fact true. I'd need to know, and follow the same procedures they used. I'd need to use the same equipment/tech they used.
In like manner, we who come to follow Jesus, we have to use the bible to corroborate whether we're engaging Jesus, or a false-construct of Jesus.
So, if you used the book of mormon, and the documents of the LDS, or the NWT/JW/WTS documents, then of course you never met God.
They preach another Jesus. something plainly stated in the letter to the Galatians.
If you focus on the cultural specifics of different denominational groups--- catholic, lutheran, baptist, etc..... You'll be focusing on the doctrines of men, taught in a manner which claim to be the commandments of God.
“Inasmuch as these people draw near with their mouths And honor Me with their lips, But have removed their hearts far from Me, And their fear toward Me is taught by the commandment of men,
Thus, it's possible to think you're doing it, and completely miss it.
When I did my initial inquiry--- I wasn't interested in knowing which denomination was God's. I just wanted to know if God was real, and the Jesus stuff I'd been hearing was real or yet one more in a long line of piles of religious BS.
I.e., I was already aware that there were a lot of piles of religious BS out there, and didn't have any interest in them.
I wanted to know two things, and those two things only---
Was God real.
Was what I was hearing about Jesus real, or just another pile of religious BS.
Zero plus zero adds up to zero, Steve. Zero scientific evidence for God.
This raises a flag for me, about the details of your failure. You may have indeed done what someone else said. And that you found nothing is evidence that you didn't do it God's way.
Eg., if I invited you to meet with me at a specific restaurant, on a specific date and time, at the specified address, and you went everywhere except that restaurant, at that time/date, then of course you'd never have met me. Or even if you went to the correct address, but at any other date/time than what I specified, you'd have never met me.
So.... telling me you didn't meet God.... no brainer there.
This is why I asked for specific details, and information used to do your "research" on this.
We do this on God's terms, or we find nothing.
Jesus was quite clear---
23 Jesus answered and said to him, “If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him.
I did not say that. Why do you put words in my mouth?
Looks pretty clear to me.
How do the locals disprove all the miracles performed by Jesus ? How do the locals disprove miracles still done in Jesus Name today? Our Pastor did graduate engineering in Nuclear Medical Engineering. We pray for Jesus to do a miracle, we go along if the Doc says it is a miracle and have the...
forums.carm.org
You said it's a waste of time.
I am not going to do that because I think it is a waste time.
So, no. I did not put words in your mouth. I restated what I read, in my own words.
That is what teachers always told us growing up right? that's what mine told me and my classmates for well over a decade in school, from kindergarten through high school and in college too.
From what I read in these forums, it seems to me that atheists do it about God all the time too.
Oh... wait....
It's ok for you to do it regarding God and what he said, but you don't want it done to you? That's rather hypocritical, isn't it? I get that others do it, but if you don't like it--- perhaps you should not do so yourself.
If you don't like being misunderstood, don't you think your misunderstanding of God is a problem too?
Why do you feel the need to twist what I say? Do you think I will be amazed at your skills? Or are you just trying to convince yourself?
Perhaps I'm not doing that at all. I'm just doing what my school teachers told me to do.... for at least 16 years. More like 20.
No, not looking for you to be impressed at all. I'm just using the standard, well over a half-century practice of restating what I read in my own words.
And yet when asked for what you turned up, all you had was diddly squat. Why is that?
Curious, isn't it.
I give you the means I used, and you don't want it, so you blame me.
Why is that?
Do you actually think I'm going to freak out, and say--- oh gosh! my 43+ years of experience with God aren't true after all!?!??
And you did not get any medical assistance for these, right? There is no chance medical science healed your gunshot wound or cancers?
Not when my doctors tell me themselves---- this is a miracle.
they're attestation to the miraculous nature of my recoveries are the only reason I talk about them.
So.... no.
All of which the delusion of a god could do.
More likely that the delusion of no god, would convince you that you're right, and anyone with a contrary experience would by necessity, be wrong.
Steve, you claimed to have scientific evidence. What here do you consider to be scientific evidence? Be honest with yourself, even if you cannot be honest with me.
The existence of a people group, with specific lineage.
the existence of a nation, with specific lineage.
the existence of the miraculous, through the specific nature of God's involvement, in the name of Jesus.
No, Steve, I am being invited to learn what your opinion is.
Sounds like bias to me.
It is your opinion that it is the truth. I disagree.
I didn't demand you did agree.
I invited you to take the time to learn the truth for yourself, using the bible as the "journal" to follow similar "experimentation" activities.
So, since you've previously stated you believe it's a waste of time, and didn't get diddly squat, I suppose you're just going to live with the awareness that others experienced success, where you experienced failure.
Yes, Steve. I think learn what your opinion is is a waste of time. You clearly stated you have scientific evidence for God, and yet when challenged you cannot provide that. That leads me to conclude that you are, to be perfectly frank, delusional, and yes, it would be a waste of my time to learn any more about your delusions.
Enjoy your delusions then.
You're being invited to learn--- not my opinions of the bible's veracity... But that of the bible's.
But to do what other Jesus followers have been doing for 1987 years, and verify them for yourself.
I think you find it easier to ignore what I'm saying because it confirms your own biases, and preconceptions. and this is convenient for you.
truth costs. It's far less costly to pay the price of the truth now than it will be in eternity.