Is Jesus God the Father? No. Rather he reveals God the Father.Do you believe Jesus is God ?
Is Jesus God the Father? No. Rather he reveals God the Father.Do you believe Jesus is God ?
Why, given my points above? How can God have a God in Ps 45:7?Words are stubborn little things that like to hang on to their range of meaning. In Ps 45:6 אלהימ was chosen for a reason, and the LXX had a good reason to translate it θεός. They did not use the equivalent of "Lord" but the equivalent of "God."
That's a theological issue I'm not concerned with. The reason I find your points less than persuasive (though interesting) is because that's not the way the text was read for most of the history of interpretation. It becomes more of a thing in the 20th century. For fun, the NJPS renders:Why, given my points above? How can God have a God in Ps 45:7?
Which text are you referring to: the Psalm or Hebrews? There is no doubt that the Messianic interpretation of the Psalm is old and the consistent understanding of the text from the early Christian period, but it by no means certain that it is the oldest interpretation. Do you think it was never meant to refer to a specific ruler? Is there any evidence of a messianic interpretation before the rise of Christianity?That's a theological issue I'm not concerned with. The reason I find your points less than persuasive (though interesting) is because that's not the way the text was read for most of the history of interpretation.
It is a point of logic rather , and therefore must be addressed in a biblical languages forum.That's a theological issue I'm not concerned with. The reason I find your points less than persuasive (though interesting) is because that's not the way the text was read for most of the history of interpretation. It becomes more of a thing in the 20th century. For fun, the NJPS renders:
"Your divine throne is everlasting; your scepter is a scepter of equity." So you are certainly not alone in wanting to "do something" apart from the more literal reading. I must admit I've enjoyed the interaction and digging deeper into this.
Just quickly, ἅγιος is always an adjective, and θεός always a noun. As for the rest, "because you want it to be" is not an argument.
What's to check? I know the language. You don't. Now, if you want talk about the substantive use of the adjective, such as οἱ ἅγιοι, "the holy ones, the saints..." that's a different discussion which might require you to know something about the language.Always an adjective eh?
Did you even bother to check to see if your claim makes any sense?
And could you define theos at John 1:1c? What does the word refer to?
What's to check? I know the language. You don't. Now, if you want talk about the substantive use of the adjective, such as οἱ ἅγιοι, "the holy ones, the saints..." that's a different discussion which might require you to know something about the language.
No, it's a noun.What a mess.
So please do clarify whether you are understanding John 1:1c to be functioning as an adjective.
I would take issue with your claim that you “know” biblical Koine beyond the usual Trinitarian talking points.What's to check? I know the language. You don't. Now, if you want talk about the substantive use of the adjective, such as οἱ ἅγιοι, "the holy ones, the saints..." that's a different discussion which might require you to know something about the language.
εἴ σοι δοκεῖ, γένοιτο!I would take issue with your claim that you “know” biblical Koine beyond the usual Trinitarian talking points.
Hash….εἴ σοι δοκεῖ, γένοιτο!
Here's where you reveal who really doesn't know the language. Common Koine expressions, easily understood.Hash….
Nonsense,.. English expression transliterated into “Koine.”Here's where you reveal who really doesn't know the language. Common Koine expressions, easily understood.
Amusing.Nonsense,.. English expression transliterated into “Koine.”
And how would you phrase it, O uncredentialed master of Koine? πῶς οἶδας;It’s not just that one word, it’s the way your expression is phrased. .. Moving on.
No, it's a noun.
As a noun.Functioning as a noun?
Or functioning as an adjective?