History of slavery, dating back 3500 years

SteveB

Well-known member
Since the atheists are running amok with slavery, it seems like it's important to examine ancient history in the middle east.

For the first article, it says that laws for slavery were codified in the Hammurabi law, from 3500 years ago.


So, I'll start with Hammurabi. 3500 years ago would be similar timing to Moses.
 




 
God can make explicit declarations about coveting and kids being sassy.... but when it comes to upsetting the Hebrew economy and saying something explicit about owning another to the point where you may beat them, but just short of death, and own their progeny for life, and tag them through the ear as you would a cow.... god just doesn't want to make any waves.
 
Since the atheists are running amok with slavery, it seems like it's important to examine ancient history in the middle east.

For the first article, it says that laws for slavery were codified in the Hammurabi law, from 3500 years ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery?wprov=sfla1

So, I'll start with Hammurabi. 3500 years ago would be similar timing to Moses.
Do you think any of this makes it moral for God to say chattel slavery is allowed?

What you are doing is presenting atheist argument. There is no God. The laws recorded in the Bible were invented by man, heavily influenced by heir neighbouring cultures. This is why the laws explicitly protect Israelites, and offer virtually no protection for gentile slaves.
 
Do you think any of this makes it moral for God to say chattel slavery is allowed?
This has nothing to do with my opinions of the matter.
You made it clear a long time ago that this is entirely about your beliefs and need to win, and crush anything that doesn't agree with you.

So, when you stop with your crusade, and take the time to learn what was happening 4000 years ago, then we can talk.

What you are doing is presenting atheist argument.
?
Nope. I'm discussing history and the truth that YHVH is real and knowable.
But this statement of yours here is that you don't actually care about the truth. You only care about your crusade, and will do whatever you can to destroy the truth.
Thankfully, Jesus warned us that we can either fall on him and be broken, or he will fall on us, and we will be pulverized by the truth.


There is no God.
Yet another declaration of opinion with no proof or evidence.



The laws recorded in the Bible were invented by man, heavily influenced by heir neighbouring cultures.
The testimony of a crusader, desperate to crush, indeed create a new civilization, which was in existence throughout the 20th century and was responsible for the mass murders of over 200 million people in a matter of a few decades.
So, no thanks.
But, if you're really that motivated, just get to the punchline and start doing what your forebears did.

Don't dick around, just do it!

Although, from what I'm reading, Venezuela, China, North Korea.... they're already destroying their respective countries. You should just move there, and you can help them silence their own citizens.

Here, in the United States of America, we are among those who don't want the world you want. From what I've been reading, there are people all over the world who want nothing to do with the world you want. They're scattered throughout the human race.
So, just how desperate are you to destroy the lives of people who actually know YHVH and Jesus Christ?



This is why the laws explicitly protect Israelites, and offer virtually no protection for gentile slaves.
That is your belief.
The curious thing is that we don't actually know the why, beyond that we read. We know the what.

So, you imposing YOUR own why is pretty clear that you need to justify your beliefs.

You know what I find amusing.

You have never said a single word about slavery in the world today. There are over 40 million people today who are enslaved. Most as chattel slaves. Yet you are completely silent about them, and their enslavers.

Thus, it strikes me that the only reason you're saying anything about the bible, is so you can justify your unbelief.

Furthermore, according to Romans 2, you wouldn't give a rat's tail in hades unless YHVH had written his law on your heart and mind, showing you the truth. And this is where you seek to excuse yourself.
 
Slavery is a stain on human history. It's just as wrong now as it was then. Don't you agree, Steve?
Then why aren't you joining us in the abolition of slavery?

Much of what you buy at the stores today is made by slaves in China.
 
Then why aren't you joining us in the abolition of slavery?

Much of what you buy at the stores today is made by slaves in China.

You have no idea what I buy Steve. I am fully aware of the fact that a lot of cheap products are being manufactured by people under slavery, which is why I go out of my way to buy ethically sourced goods.

Now, why is it so difficult for you to condemn slavery? Shall we try again? It's an easy question, can you answer it?

Slavery is a stain on human history. It's just as wrong now as it was then. Don't you agree, Steve?
 
You have no idea what I buy Steve. I am fully aware of the fact that a lot of cheap products are being manufactured by people under slavery, which is why I go out of my way to buy ethically sourced goods.

Now, why is it so difficult for you to condemn slavery? Shall we try again? It's an easy question, can you answer it?

Slavery is a stain on human history. It's just as wrong now as it was then. Don't you agree, Steve?
The cross of Jesus condemned slavery 1990 years ago.
His death on the cross and his resurrection defined the value of the human race as infinite and intrinsic.

The entire human race. Not some, not one race, but not another.

So, if you actually want to be taken seriously regarding the value of the human being, repent and believe the gospel of Jesus.

Not one of your moralizations and pontifications has any basis if YHVH doesn't exist.

It's clear that laws are irrelevant because they change with the political party.

In ancient Greece, it was legal to leave your children out on the doorstep so that exposure could kill them.
Slavery was rampant in Greece and it wasn't a problem.
Same with Rome-- pre-Catholicism.

In nazi Germany, Jewish people, LGBT and disabled people were slaughtered like animals.

In countries like Soviet socialist countries, China, north Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, it's legal to murder people who don't follow the status quo.

There's a standard moral righteousness against which we all will be judged.
 
This has nothing to do with my opinions of the matter.
You made it clear a long time ago that this is entirely about your beliefs and need to win, and crush anything that doesn't agree with you.

So, when you stop with your crusade, and take the time to learn what was happening 4000 years ago, then we can talk.
What makes you think I do not know this just as well as you Steve?

I earlier said:
What you are doing is presenting atheist argument.
Nope. I'm discussing history and the truth that YHVH is real and knowable.
But this statement of yours here is that you don't actually care about the truth. You only care about your crusade, and will do whatever you can to destroy the truth.
I have no idea where you get that from.

I pointed out that what you presented so far is the atheist view. That is to say, nothing in those links suggests or implies that God exists as far as I can see. They all discuss the slavery situation in the ANE as though God does not exist - that is the atheist view.

I earlier said:
What you are doing is presenting atheist argument. There is no God. ...
Yet another declaration of opinion with no proof or evidence.
Surely you are not expecting me to prove that the atheist's believe there is no God?

Do you know what "atheist" actually means, Steve?

The testimony of a crusader, desperate to crush, indeed create a new civilization, which was in existence throughout the 20th century and was responsible for the mass murders of over 200 million people in a matter of a few decades.
So, no thanks.
But, if you're really that motivated, just get to the punchline and start doing what your forebears did.
I am going to guess this is you equating atheist with communist.

It is strange how you so often derail your own thread. When are you going to explain why God allows slavery, Steve? That is what you said you would do.

You have never said a single word about slavery in the world today. There are over 40 million people today who are enslaved. Most as chattel slaves. Yet you are completely silent about them, and their enslavers.
Just looking through your first two posts, and it seems you are guilty of doing just the same.

My excuse is I was responding to posts about slavery 3500 years ago. What is yours?
 
The cross of Jesus condemned slavery 1990 years ago.
His death on the cross and his resurrection defined the value of the human race as infinite and intrinsic.

The entire human race. Not some, not one race, but not another.

So, if you actually want to be taken seriously regarding the value of the human being, repent and believe the gospel of Jesus.

Not one of your moralizations and pontifications has any basis if YHVH doesn't exist.

It's clear that laws are irrelevant because they change with the political party.

In ancient Greece, it was legal to leave your children out on the doorstep so that exposure could kill them.
Slavery was rampant in Greece and it wasn't a problem.
Same with Rome-- pre-Catholicism.

In nazi Germany, Jewish people, LGBT and disabled people were slaughtered like animals.

In countries like Soviet socialist countries, China, north Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, it's legal to murder people who don't follow the status quo.

There's a standard moral righteousness against which we all will be judged.

All I want you to do Steve is to answer a simple question, not go off on a rant. Let us try for a third time, shall we?

Slavery is a stain on human history. It's just as wrong now as it was then. Don't you agree, Steve?
 
All I want you to do Steve is to answer a simple question, not go off on a rant. Let us try for a third time, shall we?

Slavery is a stain on human history. It's just as wrong now as it was then. Don't you agree, Steve?
Astonishing how that you're not able to reason clearly when someone makes a statement and then blame others for your own bias and preconceptions.

Ok. Consider the following.

Ever since my arrival on this forum in November 2012, I've been describing Jesus, and the bible.

I've never promoted an atheist mindset of non-belief in YHVH or Jesus.

I've spent years saying that I am a follower of Jesus. I've been repeatedly promoting the bible, the biblical narrative of biblical christianity, Jesus, YHVH, as well as my experiences with YHVH for the past 45 years.

Last I checked, this means that I agree with the teachings of Jesus and the cross, and the importance of following Jesus.

So when I state that the cross of Jesus is the definitive condemnation of slavery, it's pretty simple enough to come to the conclusion that I am condemning slavery.

I'd apologize that my description doesn't fit your biases and preconceptions about how things are to be stated, but please tell me where I have ever said anything that would agree with your views on how things should be stated.

Furthermore, since when did you become the final authority of how things were defined and required to be stated?
 
Astonishing how that you're not able to reason clearly when someone makes a statement and then blame others for your own bias and preconceptions.

Ok. Consider the following.

Ever since my arrival on this forum in November 2012, I've been describing Jesus, and the bible.

I've never promoted an atheist mindset of non-belief in YHVH or Jesus.

I've spent years saying that I am a follower of Jesus. I've been repeatedly promoting the bible, the biblical narrative of biblical christianity, Jesus, YHVH, as well as my experiences with YHVH for the past 45 years.

Last I checked, this means that I agree with the teachings of Jesus and the cross, and the importance of following Jesus.

So when I state that the cross of Jesus is the definitive condemnation of slavery, it's pretty simple enough to come to the conclusion that I am condemning slavery.

I'd apologize that my description doesn't fit your biases and preconceptions about how things are to be stated, but please tell me where I have ever said anything that would agree with your views on how things should be stated.

Furthermore, since when did you become the final authority of how things were defined and required to be stated?
Do you have an opinion about slavery that is separate from whatever Jesus might say about it? An opinion that is fully your own, without regard to what Jesus said about slavery?

ETA: By "separate" I mean without regard to Jesus' statements or opinions. Your personal opinion might be the same as Jesus' opinion, or it might be different, that doesn't matter according to what I mean by "separate."
 
What makes you think I do not know this just as well as you Steve?
Because you keep beating the same old dead horse over and over and over and over and over and over......again as though you have stumbled upon the definitive proof that YHVH doesn't exist and his law is a man made law.

If you were as smart as you believe yourself to be, I'd have thought that you would have figured out by now that you don't actually possess the power or medical knowledge to bring dead horses back to life.
But, obviously you keep telling yourself you can.


I have no idea where you get that from.
Observations of your posts. ?
I pointed out that what you presented so far is the atheist view. That is to say, nothing in those links suggests or implies that God exists as far as I can see.
"As far as you can see...."

Wow??

Did it ever occur to you that this is exactly what the problem here is?

It's only as far as you can see.


They all discuss the slavery situation in the ANE as though God does not exist - that is the atheist view.
From your perspective.

I wasn't alive in the era when the law was written.
I just started reading Deuteronomy this week. Today I read chapter 4. In this chapter Moses stated

Deu 4:5-8 WEB 5 Behold, I have taught you statutes and ordinances, even as Yahweh my God commanded me, that you should do so in the middle of the land where you go in to possess it. 6 Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the peoples who shall hear all these statutes and say, “Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.” 7 For what great nation is there that has a god so near to them as Yahweh our God is whenever we call on him? 8 What great nation is there that has statutes and ordinances so righteous as all this law which I set before you today?

In light of the atheist mindset, as expressed by you and others who are atheists, I find myself wondering why this statement was made, and then what about this situation in that era was different from the way people view things today which would cause them to think that YHVH's laws are not so good.

The surrounding cultures of the people in that era were entrenched in the worship of false gods, false beliefs, sexual immorality without restraint, child sacrifice on the arms of metallic idols that were built to place fires inside their metal bodies, resulting in cooking the children to death, while alive.
Their cultures had no regard for family fidelity, they were murderous, treated one another as little more than property, and could violate any laws/morals we view as important today.

I.e., they made ISIS of today look like kids playing games in the park.

So, considering that, I'm thinking that as much as you despise the bible and seek to claim that you have found definitive proof that YHVH doesn't exist, they were viewing the impact of YHVH's laws on Israel as a positive thing.

I.e., "hey! Look at them! They have a culture that is becoming increasingly successful, stable, they treat others in positive ways. They're not killing their kids to gain their God's favor. They're not cheating on their wives and......."



Surely you are not expecting me to prove that the atheist's believe there is no God?
Believe? No. The stupidity I see in the posts of atheists have pretty much demonstrated that you don't BELIEVE...

I think it's imperative that you actually PROVE there is no God.

Because for people who are following Jesus, the Jewish people, muslims, and others who have a religious belief, belief and knowledge is a fundamental aspect of life.

For Jesus followers, the basis of our belief is that YHVH makes himself knowable to us through Jesus Christ.

For the Jewish people, the knowledge of God is given, but often ignored.

For Islam, they're taking a mixture of different ideas to validate the historical reconstruction of both Jewish and Christian beliefs.


Do you know what "atheist" actually means, Steve?
Eph 2:12 WEB that you were at that time separate from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of the promise, having no hope and without God in the world.

It's curious that in the Greek, the term- without God- is the Greek word, atheoi.

Your definition of atheist is a belief that God does not exist.

I think that is the inaccurate definition.

Cain, in Genesis 4 was a rather interesting character.

He knew God existed. Talked with God, and God talked with Cain to help him deal with his desire to actually enjoy the benefits of genuine worship, and knowledge of YHVH, and avoid the consequences of murdering his brother.

I am going to guess this is you equating atheist with communist.
No. Just acknowledging the history of atheist government. Communism is the result of atheism that governs.



It is strange how you so often derail your own thread. When are you going to explain why God allows slavery, Steve? That is what you said you would do.
?
People who want nothing to do with YHVH will do whatever they feel is necessary to do so.

Including believing that living a moral life is good enough.

You can believe whatever you want. Only Jesus himself is able to give us eternal life.

Just looking through your first two posts, and it seems you are guilty of doing just the same.
And?
You seem to think that nobody else is guilty of sin.

I've repeatedly violated all 10 of YHVH's commandments. It's exactly why I keep coming to Jesus. I know he's the only one who has what we humans need.

My excuse is I was responding to posts about slavery 3500 years ago. What is yours?
No need for excuses.
God is just and the justifier of all who believe in Jesus.

Rom 3:26 WEB to demonstrate his righteousness at this present time, that he might himself be just and the justifier of him who has faith in Jesus.
 
Do you have an opinion about slavery that is separate from whatever Jesus might say about it?
Of course I do.
However, as it carries no eternal value or worth, and as I am a different person than I was 45 years ago, I prefer having an eternal perspective, which has genuine value and meaning.



An opinion that is fully your own, without regard to what Jesus said about slavery?
Of course I do.
However, as it carries no eternal value or worth, and as I am a different person than I was 45 years ago, I prefer having an eternal perspective, which has genuine value and meaning.


ETA: By "separate" I mean without regard to Jesus' statements or opinions. Your personal opinion might be the same as Jesus' opinion, or it might be different, that doesn't matter according to what I mean by "separate."
Of course I do.

However, as it carries no eternal value or worth, and as I am a different person than I was 45 years ago, I prefer having an eternal perspective, which has genuine value and meaning.
 




Apart from providing some background what is your point Steve?
 
Why do you need me to have a point besides providing background?
Well you said "atheists are running amok with slavery". I assumed you had some point to make about that and providing background was your way of framing the conversation.
 
Because you keep beating the same old dead horse over and over and over and over and over and over......again as though you have stumbled upon the definitive proof that YHVH doesn't exist and his law is a man made law.
I have yet to see any evidence this horse is dead. Nothing in this thread addresses the actual issue, which is that, according to the Bible, God says chattel slavery is allowed.

Observations of your posts. ?

"As far as you can see...."

Wow??

Did it ever occur to you that this is exactly what the problem here is?

It's only as far as you can see.
Obviously I do, given I used exactly that qualification.

From your perspective.
How about you give your perspective then?
  • Do you agree that chattel slavery is wrong?
  • Do you agree that, according to the Bible, God says chattel slavery is allowed?

I wasn't alive in the era when the law was written.
I just started reading Deuteronomy this week. Today I read chapter 4. In this chapter Moses stated

Deu 4:5-8 WEB 5 Behold, I have taught you statutes and ordinances, even as Yahweh my God commanded me, that you should do so in the middle of the land where you go in to possess it. 6 Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the peoples who shall hear all these statutes and say, “Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.” 7 For what great nation is there that has a god so near to them as Yahweh our God is whenever we call on him? 8 What great nation is there that has statutes and ordinances so righteous as all this law which I set before you today?

In light of the atheist mindset, as expressed by you and others who are atheists, I find myself wondering why this statement was made, and then what about this situation in that era was different from the way people view things today which would cause them to think that YHVH's laws are not so good.
The statement was made to justify the laws the men invented.

What is different today is that we believe slavery is wrong. Given this thread is specifically about slavery - and you started it - it is bizarre you could not work this out for yourself.

The surrounding cultures of the people in that era were entrenched in the worship of false gods, false beliefs, sexual immorality without restraint, child sacrifice on the arms of metallic idols that were built to place fires inside their metal bodies, resulting in cooking the children to death, while alive.
Their cultures had no regard for family fidelity, they were murderous, treated one another as little more than property, and could violate any laws/morals we view as important today.

I.e., they made ISIS of today look like kids playing games in the park.
Or at least that is what the Israelites would have us believe.

I suspect the reality was a little different. There certainly were laws in other cultures, see, for example, the Code of Hammuradi. Yes, there was child sacrifice, but it is a huge generalisation to say all the surrounding nations were practicing it.

Furthermore, as the laws on slavery in the Bible show, the Israelites could violate laws/morals we view as important today, and they too were permitted to treat one another as little more than property.

And further still, none of that justifies allowing chattel slavery.

So, considering that, I'm thinking that as much as you despise the bible and seek to claim that you have found definitive proof that YHVH doesn't exist, they were viewing the impact of YHVH's laws on Israel as a positive thing.

I.e., "hey! Look at them! They have a culture that is becoming increasingly successful, stable, they treat others in positive ways. They're not killing their kids to gain their God's favor. They're not cheating on their wives and......."
Do please explain how this justifies allowing chattel slavery.
 
Well you said "atheists are running amok with slavery". I assumed you had some point to make about that and providing background was your way of framing the conversation.
They are/have been for a long time.

It's as though they believe they've found that one thing that definitively proves that YHVH isn't real, or just.

The cross of Jesus proves otherwise.

You want to jump on that now, and use the same mentality to blame YHVH for using the death of Jesus to save you from experiencing the consequences of your sin?

the death of Jesus on the cross definitively demonstrates that all humans, regardless of what state they're in, have equal value to YHVH.

The resurrection seals their/our value to YHVH.
 
Back
Top