Actually I’ve had a think about this and I know what the heart of the issue is here.Hi Formersda,
Thanks for the link, although I'm not sure why you shared it.
Of course you're going to disagree with the biblical definition of soul as it goes contrary to your predetermined belief system. If you have an alternate source that provides a definition of soul more to your liking I'd love to see it. However I'm surmising you can't find such a source. In that case you don't get to just wave off a definition of soul just cuz you don't prefer it.
But no, you didn't answer my question. You're continuing to neglect addressing the fact that you said the above belief was something expressed solely in the writings of EGW and NOT in the Bible. I'm not seeing that you're acknowledging the fallacy of this position.
Third time:
God bless.
- According to Genesis 2:7 is it true that DUST + BREATH = LIVING BEING (soul/nephesh)?
- Is it true that what you claimed previously about the above premise being "an EGW quote and not in the Bible" is actually false?
For you, you cannot accept the clear writing of scripture about life after death otherwise you would have to deny the investigative judgement.