That's another mistake, you're just addressing the historicity of the Bible here, not my point about good reasons to think something true.No, the Bible describes the resurrection in the same fashion Washington crossing the Delaware is described....witnessed...I have made no basic error.
There is no equivalence between Washington and the resurrection. If the accounts of Washington were written decades after the events and not by eye witnesses, we would have good reason to doubt them.
Another mistake, I didn't say Christian scholars deny the resurrection, but that they doubt we have actual eye witness accounts.As to the so-called christians scholars you have mentioned who have denied the resurrection....they are not Christians.
So what? Why are you quoting Bible verses at an atheist without first giving good reason as to why I should think them true?1 For 15:16 For if the dead are not raised, then not even Christ has been raised. 17 And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. 18 Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If our hope in Christ is for this life alone, we are to be pitied more than all men.