How would you feel?

Josheb

Well-known member
If his posts are "filled with fallacy", then why do you never point those fallacies out?
LOL! I did! Close to a dozen of them!
You just claim that they are filled with fallacy and avoid addressing them.
Evidence proves otherwise.
It wasn't me who brought it up. Don't jump on others for continuing a discussion that they didn't start.

Or, to be fair, jump on yourself, because you've continued that conversation.
Non sequitur
 

BMS

Well-known member
There wasn't any. There was a question which you leapt in to give an irrelevant answer, not knowing the context.
Its the human reproductive process. If you dont like it dont get pregnant. If you dont want to get pregnant use contraceptive. If you dont want to take the risk dont have sex.
 

Temujin

Well-known member
Natural rights trump arbitrary legalism.

If women are as stupid as you presume then they should be sterilized.
There is no such thing as "natural rights". No contraceptive method is 100% effective. Those that are most effective are abortificants.
 

BMS

Well-known member
There is no such thing as "natural rights". No contraceptive method is 100% effective. Those that are most effective are abortificants.
Then that is what you have to deal with, without taking out your disaffection on the reality
 

Josheb

Well-known member
Again you butt in to someone else's conversation without bothering to understand the context.
That's laughably absurd. First, this is an international internet discussion board open to all without invitation. Second, the posts demonstrably show a profound lack of "butting in" on my part. Third, anyone reading post #191 shows you doing the very thing about which you now complain. Neither poster asked you to respond to the conversation being had between them. If you don't think posters should butt in then practice what you preach and butt out. Lastly, your post is a red herring that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. It's just another in a growing list of fallacious responses I've noted even as my doing so has been denied.

The other poster's attempted analogy is another false equivalence, and as such it does not warrant any further response than to note it for what is it: fallacious! No one asked your opinion on any of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMS

Temujin

Well-known member
That's laughably absurd. First, this is an international internet discussion board open to all without invitation. Second, the posts demonstrably show a profound lack of "butting in" on my part.
Hilarious. You are butting in right now, since the comment was not made to you.
I'm Butting in as well, of course, but it is not the Butting in that causes the irritation but the doing so out of context and showing ignorance about what has been said.

Such as assuming that a reply made to someone else was aimed at you.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Hilarious. You are butting in right now, since the comment was not made to you.
I'm Butting in as well, of course, but it is not the Butting in that causes the irritation but the doing so out of context and showing ignorance about what has been said.

Such as assuming that a reply made to someone else was aimed at you.
Stop butting in please 😀
 
Top