Been reading a bit on the war of Steady State vs. Big Bang. Simple question for someone more studied in Big Bang vs. Steady State theory.
Hoyle's problem in Steady State theory was that he couldn't show the science, or isolate an observable instance behind the engine of all the new stuff forming in a C-field.
Doesn't the Big Bang merely kick that same dilemma into a singularity and just assume it was all there? Is the honestly given "non-explaination" of that dilemma the claim that we can't see past Plank-time so we assume that the engine is tucked back in there somewhere?
Hoyle's problem in Steady State theory was that he couldn't show the science, or isolate an observable instance behind the engine of all the new stuff forming in a C-field.
Doesn't the Big Bang merely kick that same dilemma into a singularity and just assume it was all there? Is the honestly given "non-explaination" of that dilemma the claim that we can't see past Plank-time so we assume that the engine is tucked back in there somewhere?