I can't wait for this to happen. What could go wrong?

[glenlogie]

I don't get why it matters to you, personally, that a gay couple lives down the street.

When this issue came up before a court, the judge asked the SSM opponents to show how heterosexual marriage was harmed by SSM, and they could not do it.

I don't see why it matters to you if three people want to get married

 

[Backup]

Why? Homosexuals couldn't handle civil unions as opposed to marriage. Is your whole world lgbt focused?

My point, though simple, was miles above your head.

 

[DeSanto]

Doubtful. But first, you would have to consider if the mRNA would even survive the aerosolization process and how long that would take. You can't just spray the cold vaccine in the air and expect it to dance around like dust motes. I don't think it would be very effective if it just drops to the floor.

I did a thread on “smart dust” a few weeks ago, in which there was discussion about how scientist have been researching ways to keep these “dust motes” airborne… for longer periods of time.

I wonder if there might be some sort of connection here.

But I’m interested in your opinion regarding informed consent. Would you say, informed consent should be required to implement such an experiment? Or no?

True....I don't disagree....but then again they changed the definition.

@CrowCross - First of all, we don’t know this “AirVax” experiment hasn’t already been implemented. Think “Canadian wild fires.”

But what if this “AirVax” stuff isn’t actual mRNA. What if it’s the device used to connect to it? See link above re: Smart Dust

Think of mRNA as a computer operating system (that’s already been injected to unsuspecting victims). Smart dust provide the ability to remotely connect to the operation system, like a bluetooth device. That way, if you get a “new virus” they can just punch in the codes remotely and instruct the mRNA to produce whatever proteins are needed. etc. etc.

I’m just spitting ideas here.

 

[Michael R2]

Then it sounds like you're safe. Have a nice day.

You're safe too. Your source was a tad bit disingenuous.

 

[Michael R2]

I did a thread on “smart dust” a few weeks ago, in which there was discussion about how scientist have been researching ways to keep these “dust motes” airborne… for longer periods of time.

I wonder if there might be some sort of connection here.

But I’m interested in your opinion regarding informed consent. Would you say, informed consent should be required to implement such an experiment? Or no?


@CrowCross - First of all, we don’t know this “AirVax” experiment hasn’t already been implemented. Think “Canadian wild fires.”

But what if this “AirVax” stuff isn’t actual mRNA. What if it’s the device used to connect to it? See link above re: Smart Dust

Think of mRNA as a computer operating system (that’s already been injected to unsuspecting victims). Smart dust provide the ability to remotely connect to the operation system, like a bluetooth device. That way, if you get a “new virus” they can just punch in the codes remotely and instruct the mRNA to produce whatever proteins are needed. etc. etc.

I’m just spitting ideas here.

With what it takes just to manufacture an mRNA sequence, I would think remote manipulation would be akin to an actual magic trick.

 

[DeSanto]

With what it takes just to manufacture an mRNA sequence, I would think remote manipulation would be akin to an actual magic trick.

Or… Artificial Intelligence 🤔

 

[CrowCross]

I did a thread on “smart dust” a few weeks ago, in which there was discussion about how scientist have been researching ways to keep these “dust motes” airborne… for longer periods of time.

I wonder if there might be some sort of connection here.

But I’m interested in your opinion regarding informed consent. Would you say, informed consent should be required to implement such an experiment? Or no?


@CrowCross - First of all, we don’t know this “AirVax” experiment hasn’t already been implemented. Think “Canadian wild fires.”

But what if this “AirVax” stuff isn’t actual mRNA. What if it’s the device used to connect to it? See link above re: Smart Dust

Think of mRNA as a computer operating system (that’s already been injected to unsuspecting victims). Smart dust provide the ability to remotely connect to the operation system, like a bluetooth device. That way, if you get a “new virus” they can just punch in the codes remotely and instruct the mRNA to produce whatever proteins are needed. etc. etc.

I’m just spitting ideas here.

It's certainly not out of their possibility. At one time it was science fiction....with the technology of today it can easily be scientific reality.

Then again Michael R2 says I'm a "tad bit disingenuous".

 

[CrowCross]

With what it takes just to manufacture an mRNA sequence, I would think remote manipulation would be akin to an actual magic trick.

You do know they've been doing it for a little while now? In an earlier post I mentioned how medicine can be delivered to cancer cells..and activated with a frequency. But then again I'm a "tad bit disingenuous".

 

[Michael R2]

Or… Artificial Intelligence 🤔

It's not the program, it's the hardware that does the manipulation.

 

[Michael R2]

You do know they've been doing it for a little while now? In an earlier post I mentioned how medicine can be delivered to cancer cells..and activated with a frequency. But then again I'm a "tad bit disingenuous".

Remotely? You'll have to show that one again. I know cancer drugs can be targeted by chemical configuration, but they are triggered by a chemical response, not a remote frequency. I called the article a tad bit ingenuous, not you. It's not on me if it struck a nerve for you.

 

[DeSanto]

It's not the program, it's the hardware that does the manipulation.

Okay?

 

[vibise]

That’s absurd. It’s a radical change when you go from marriage being the union of the sexes to being a union of two people of the same sex.



You gather completely incorrectly. The town I live in is extraordinarily liberal. 6 Democrats to every 1 Republican. University town.

This is one reason why I find it hilarious when democrats argue against voter ID laws - because where I live - a town DOMINATED by democrats - you have to show your ID to vote, and nobody seems to have any problem with that. LOL

Liberals argue against voter ID laws that have requirements making it harder for minorities to vote.

Free easy-to-get IDs available to all citizens would not be objectionable.

 

[vibise]

I don’t even remotely understand this comment. It doesn’t matter to me at all. In fact, for the first ten years of my family living in our current house, the couple across the street was a lesbian couple. Two older ladies. Wonderful people. We loved them. They ended up moving to a retirement community. Great neighbors.

So it is OK if they are roommates, but not OK if they get married?

 

[Crazy Ivan]

Liberals argue against voter ID laws that have requirements making it harder for minorities to vote.

Free easy-to-get IDs available to all citizens would not be objectionable.

I have seen so many liberals argue that any voter ID laws are automatically racist. Including in this very forum. That anyone who Hass to get any form of ID, it constitutes some sort of poll tax.

 

[Crazy Ivan]

So it is OK if they are roommates, but not OK if they get married?

I haven’t said anything about whether any of this is OK or not. You asked me a question about how I would feel about a gay couple as a neighbor, and I told you the answer. But to your point above here, you don’t see any difference in life between roommates and married couples? Are you serious?

 

[vibise]

I have seen so many liberals argue that any voter ID laws are automatically racist. Including in this very forum. That anyone who Hass to get any form of ID, it constitutes some sort of poll tax.

If it costs money to be able to vote, how is that not a poll tax?

 

[vibise]

I haven’t said anything about whether any of this is OK or not. You asked me a question about how I would feel about a gay couple as a neighbor, and I told you the answer. But to your point above here, you don’t see any difference in life between roommates and married couples? Are you serious?

Of course I see a difference. They should be able to get married if that is what they want.
So what is your position on SSM?

 

[rossum]

Free easy-to-get IDs available to all citizens would not be objectionable.

Except that the Christian Right would call it "The Mark of the Beast", and claim that voter IDs will be used to seize all patriotic Americans' guns when the New World Order comes to power. Or some such rubbish.

 

[Backup]

I haven’t said anything about whether any of this is OK or not. You asked me a question about how I would feel about a gay couple as a neighbor, and I told you the answer. But to your point above here, you don’t see any difference in life between roommates and married couples? Are you serious?

You don’t feel it’s your duty to save them from their “dangerous” lifestyle? Or is that just trans people? We’re the butch? Have short hair? Where does lesbianism end and trans begin?

Most of the usual suspects here think your lesbian neighbors are going to burn in Hell for all eternity. And they think that’s a good thing.

 

[Crazy Ivan]

If it costs money to be able to vote, how is that not a poll tax?

So your last post said that liberals don’t oppose voter ID laws as long as the ID can be obtained by ethnic minority people. And now you’re agreeing that requiring IDs constitutes a poll tax, which would make it unconstitutional. Can you please make up your mind whether IDs should or should not be required to vote?