CrowCross
Well-known member
Thank you for pointing out my error. I should have posted: "If you leave out natural selection then you are not talking about evolution."
Evolution is random mutation (i.e. chance) and natural selection. You need to include both in any probability calculation.
The problem is with chance. Natural selection is what drove the speciation after the animals came off the ark.
The difference is the animals loss information rather than gained information which the T.o.E. requires. To gain the complex information which makes up the DNA code...by chance...is what stops evo-ism in it's tracks.
Just the act of moving a snout up an animals forehead and accounting for all the changes to morph it into a working successful blowhole...by random mutations is impossible.....then throw in natural selection....evolution fails.
Again you fail to describe an undesignable organism. To help you, here is what Darwin said:
All organism are designed. Evo-ism doesn't work..which is why I can stand by my statement that you can't show how mutations can add up beyond the coloring book level.
I've read of certain seeds that need to be scratched by a birds digestive system to be pooped out and then germinate...or seeds that need to be in a forest fire to germinate. But, we can even go deeper with systems within an organism that are dependent on each other to have evolved at the same time to support each other. I've presented the assembly line of organelle as an example in the past that the evo-minded here seem to shy away from answering."If it could be proved that any part of the structure of any one species had been formed for the exclusive good of another species, it would annihilate my theory, for such could not have been produced through natural selection." - Origin, Chapter Six.
"If it could be proved that «... man arrived via the goo through the zoo ...» it would annihilate ID theory, for such could not have been produced through intelligent design."What I am looking for is an equivalent statement from Intelligent Design:
"If it could be proved that «... fill in the blank here ...» it would annihilate ID theory, for such could not have been produced through intelligent design."
So far ID does not appear to have filled in that blank.