G
guest1
Guest
Thanks for the laughYa, all of them. LOL
hope this helps
Thanks for the laughYa, all of them. LOL
hope this helps
A perfect example of synergy.I didn't receive the Holy Spirit as per Acts 2:38.
I received the Holy Spirit as I repented and was being regenerated.
God actually "chose us in Him" at the time specified by Eph 1:4. He didn't choose to put us on a future agenda to be chosen later. He actually chose us in Him before the foundation of the world.When I was regenerated I was placed into Christ. Prior to the creation of the world God choose me to be placed into Christ during my life.
2 Pet 1:5-10 is perfectly written just the way it is to show you that our election is dependent/conditional on us being fruitful.Well feel free to to fill in the word wherever you like.
Thank you Captain Obvious. 2 Pet 1:5-10 is written to believers because it is up to them to make their election sure.Same thing as your other proof texts. It's written to believers. Their elect already. After all how can you be faithful to something your not part of to begin with?
Careful. You're asking for a divorce with thinking like that.Again, maintenance not admission.
Let's say I don't maintain my marriage vows, does that necessarily mean I am no longer married?
Your reasoning here is a little convoluted.
Go ahead and tell us the context of every passage where the phrases "in Christ" or "in Him" are used in the Bible.No, let's see how it is used contextually. Not what's convenient for the Pelagian.
I owe you more than I can pay back. ?Thanks for the laugh
You are getting funnier by the minute ?I owe you more than I can pay back. ?
Shows no such thing. As I pointed out and you ignored, they are already elect. It's not about how you become elect. Who is it written to?2 Pet 1:5-10 is perfectly written just the way it is to show you that our election is dependent/conditional on us being fruitful.
Thank you Captain Obvious. 2 Pet 1:5-10 is written to believers because it is up to them to make their election sure.
Careful. You're asking for a divorce with thinking like that.
You are getting funnier by the minute ?
Good one ?You are getting funnier by the minute ?
Lol, you do it.Go ahead and tell us the context of every passage where the phrases "in Christ" or "in Him" are used in the Bible.
You sound very much like some people I know who will broadcast their ideas to everyone but will not move a pinky to make them happen. They want others to do all the work.Lol, you do it.
You sound very much like some people I know who will broadcast their ideas to everyone but will not move a pinky to make them happen. They want others to do all the work.
Yup, I do. Get to itYou sound very much like some people I know who will broadcast their ideas to everyone but will not move a pinky to make them happen. They want others to do all the work.
Poor babies. LOL It will be okay.Cool... I'm due for a new book.
yes there are lots of them out there I just ordered a few today.Cool... I'm due for a new book.
Read and learn? LOL When do you start? Mr. 40 minutesyes there are lots of them out there I just ordered a few today.
some people like to read and learn while others are stuck in the dark ages rofl
lol the dead forum all of a sudden came to lifeRead and learn? LOL When do you start? Mr. 40 minutes
Irrelevant as usual. ?lol the dead forum all of a sudden came to life
I wonder why
you mean true lolIrrelevant as usual. ?
No, I mean irrelevantyou mean true lol
?You are spot on brother there is a 1 to 1 correlation between the two for sure.
It woudn't make a bit of difference for you would cry- appeal to authority fallacy so who are you kidding lolLol, show us Greek expert. This I have to see.
Thanks for proving my point lolNo, I mean irrelevant
?