No i ended that first sentence by putting 2 scriptures after to prove that point., i stated satan was powerful, you twisted it into something else.
The verses you posted.
I did not twist anything. What you wrote leads to that conclusion. Notice I asked you if that is your statement. Why? Because I did not believe you wrote with that conclusion is mind.
Lets go down the verses you posted.
Acts 2:22 held in isolation you might have a argument.
Note the immediate text identifies Jesus as YHWH in the OT
Here you have to connect the dots and put it together.
Reading Peter's sermon;
Acts 2:17-21 Peter quotes Joel especially first half of Joel 2:32 in Acts 2:21, where Lord translates from YHWH "…whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved..."
Joel 2:32 And it shall come to pass, That whoever calls on the name of the LORD [YHWH] Shall be saved. For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be deliverance, As the LORD has said, Among the remnant whom the LORD calls.
So we are looking for someone in the sermon who is called "Lord" whose name brings salvation.
Acts 2;36 Jesus identified as "Lord and Christ"
Acts 2:37 The crowd ask Peter what shall they do.
Acts 2:38 Peter explain what it means to call 'on the name of the Lord" Instead of repeating this statement when the crowd asked for more instructions, Peter commanded them, saying, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins”
Acts 2:39 Peter closes this part of his sermon by stating that Joel 2:32 has come to pass. Note the promise is not to anyone in the future but to the men listening, their children and all afar off, quoting the second half of Joel 2:32 …'For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be deliverance, As the Lord has said, “Among the remnant whom the Lord calls.”'
I Cor 8:6
1 Cor 8:6 yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live.
This is an old WTS talking point.
1. Bad logic. If the reference that the Father being “one God” proves that Jesus is not God, then by the same logic the reference that Jesus is “one Lord” means that the Father is not “Lord”. Matt 11:25 Jesus refers to the Father as God and Lord. It is illogical to conclude from this vs. that Jesus is not God as to conclude that the Father is not Lord.
2. Contradicts the author [Paul] and Scripture
Titus 2:13 looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,