Not a problem. Jesus had recovered from his coma and was walking around. You are assuming what you have to prove.
Your desperation is apparent and woefully ludicrous in every post. Jesus "coma" that he "recovered from" included a beating that products over six hundred wounds front and back, acknowledgement of his death that precluded the usual breaking of his legs...and a stab through the heart for good measure by a Roman lance.
Coma? Absolutely absurd claim. Keep it up, or your own fantasies and imaginary self-righteousness will have to come into question.
People saw Lazarus after he was cured.
Cured? He was dead for four days. In Jewish minds the soul quits the body after three. Lazarus wasn't "cured". He was dead. He was raised from the dead.
That doesn't make Lazarus God. People do recover from comas.
Lazarus wasn't god...just a friend of Jesus. He wasn't in a coma. He was dead.
All I am doing is criticising the "incontrovertible" in the OP. There are other explanations for what happened. The story, as we have it, has some holes. I am pointing out the holes.
The word really worries you...because the artifact is incontrovertible proof...of something you really really really want to deny with impunity.
Go ahead and deny it for as long as you can. The consequences will only come after your last chance to turn. Maybe you'll be lucky to hold onto your fantasies longer than most.
The real question is, knowing the truth, why do you cling to fantasies?
