Maybe but doesn't change anythingMost people with a brain between their ears know he certainly talks out of his sphincter.
Maybe but doesn't change anythingMost people with a brain between their ears know he certainly talks out of his sphincter.
So no substantive content just insultsMost people with a brain between their ears know he certainly talks out of his sphincter.
So no substantive content just insults
Like I said I do not watch Carlson.Well, if you want something substantive then you could consider the legal defence used by Fox News, and then echoed by a federal judge in a case where Carlson was accused of slander:
US District Judge Mark Kay Vyskocil's opinion based on Fox's lawyers arguments: "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Or, in other words he talks out of his sphincter, and any reasonable person should be able to see that he does.
What should we make of the mental capacity of those who'd defend him, here?Most people with a brain between their ears know he certainly talks out of his sphincter.
Translation: How can we demonize people we disagree with?What should we make of the mental capacity of those who'd defend him, here?
Most people with a brain between their ears know he certainly talks out of his sphincter.
The WHO disseminates misinformationIs a pandemic treaty being made with the W.H.O. to handle misinformation?
The WHO already has control. Why do you think the CDC does whatever they say?
I hope they not try to give any control to the W.H.O
Of course. People with a strong appetite for Fake News see him as a threat.We know you leftists do. He speaks and your sphincters spasm.