Is it okay to murder a baby that has been born if its parents are extremely poor and the baby will have a bad life?

BMS

Well-known member
I stand for getting pre- and post-natal care for all pregnant women which would decrease the third-world level of maternal and infant mortality in states like Texas.
Depends whether they are people or not
 

vibise

Well-known member
The Baby doesnt have cognitive reasoning until about 7 and puberty until about 11. what is your point?
But all babies are independent of the mother at birth. And birth is traditionally the demarcation point that identifies personhood.
 

Whateverman

Well-known member
We are standing up for the unborn human and their rights that people in their ignorant prejudice deny rights to.
There are no rights that aren't granted by human beings. Sorry.

You can claim your god grants us rights, but he never protects or enforces those rights - which means they're non-existent.
 

BMS

Well-known member
But all babies are independent of the mother at birth. And birth is traditionally the demarcation point that identifies personhood.
And 11 years old is the usual time of puberty. As I said what is your point?
 

Yakuda

Well-known member
But all babies are independent of the mother at birth. And birth is traditionally the demarcation point that identifies personhood.
"Personhood" is a nonsensical standard the left has tried to apply to the issue. Humans are entitled to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness and not personhood liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
 

Mike McK

Well-known member
Somebody has to stand up for the unborn children. As we know vibise won't.
Vibise doesn't believe in standing up for mothers, either, as she condemns and disparages the crisis pregnancy movement at every opportunity.

Vibise sees babies as a problem to be solved, not a child to be loved.

Not a nice person, that Vibise.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Who is talking about puberty except you? How is that relevant to the issue of abortion?
Who is talking about cognition or independence characteristic of living, breathing people? So what is your point
 

Mike McK

Well-known member
Right, because to the RW the people that do not matter are pregnant women.
Yeah, darn those RW people who provide healthcare, housing, food, education, clothing, transportation, life skills, childcare to expectant mothers.

Should we all be heartless monsters like you and just solve the problem by killing the baby?
 

Mike McK

Well-known member
I stand for getting pre- and post-natal care for all pregnant women which would decrease the third-world level of maternal and infant mortality in states like Texas.
Where are the so called "pro-life" people when it comes to infant mortality? If it is not a fetus, they don't care?
In another thread, you mocked us for providing healthcare to poor mothers and their unborn children.

Now, you're mad because you think we don't provide healthcare to them?

Do you know what the Bible says about a double minded person?
 

vibise

Well-known member
Some people at foetal stage of their development are not people in your opinion then?
They are not regarded as persons under the law with the rights and privileges assigned to actual living, breathing people.

I think that some consideration should be given to fetuses after viability, but the prime consideration should go to the pregnant woman.
 
Top