Is misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation included in free speech and okay according to free speech?

john james

Well-known member
Is misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation included in free speech and okay according to free speech? Why or why not?

Mis information is false information spread unintentionally
Dis information is false information spread intentionally.
Malinformation is information that is based on reality or facts but it is used to inflict harm.


If these are included and okay due to free speech then why do leftist cultists and some of their ideological supporters use these terms?
 
Last edited:
There was a discussion about free speech exceptions not that long ago here at CARM. ---> here


- Incitement

- Fighting Words

- Obscenity

- Defamation ( Alex Jones is an example here )

- Commercial Speech

- Cases in which freedom of speech is outweighed by an even more compelling interest

...

Christians should follow what Jesus said about loving one another in addition to the law of the land.
___
 
Last edited:
Is misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation included in free speech and okay according to free speech? Why or why not?

Mis information is false information spread unintentionally
Dis information is false information spread intentionally.
Malinformation is information that is based on reality or facts but it is used to inflict harm.


If these are included and okay due to free speech then why do leftist cultists and some of their ideological supporters use these terms?
The gubment has meetings and connections into social media groups and is running the show on how to block free speech.

This lawyer discusses leaked memos from the marxist Gubment messing with censorship. 46:00 minute mark

 
There was a discussion about free speech exceptions not that long ago here at CARM. ---> here


- Incitement

- Fighting Words

- Obscenity

- Defamation ( Alex Jones is an example here )

- Commercial Speech

- Cases in which freedom of speech is outweighed by an even more compelling interest

...

Christians should follow what Jesus said about loving one another in addition to the law of the land.
___
Harry Leggs exposed your left wing political bias very well in Post #82

The gubment in charge of who says what.





______
 
Is misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation included in free speech and okay according to free speech? Why or why not?

Mis information is false information spread unintentionally
Dis information is false information spread intentionally.
Malinformation is information that is based on reality or facts but it is used to inflict harm.


If these are included and okay due to free speech then why do leftist cultists and some of their ideological supporters use these terms?
My suggestion is to go to a packed theatre and scream fire fire and see if it is misinformation or whatever else
 
The gubment has meetings and connections into social media groups and is running the show on how to block free speech.

This lawyer discusses leaked memos from the marxist Gubment messing with censorship. 46:00 minute mark


"Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except by God's appointment, and the authorities that exist have been instituted by God. So the person who resists such authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will incur judgment (for rulers cause no fear for good conduct but for bad). Do you desire not to fear authority? Do good and you will receive its commendation, for it is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be in fear, for it does not bear the sword in vain. It is God's servant to administer retribution on the wrongdoer." ( Romans 13: 1-4)

___
 
Mis information is false information spread unintentionally
Like "leftist cultists"?

Dis information is false information spread intentionally.
Like "leftist cultists"?

Malinformation is information that is based on reality or facts but it is used to inflict harm.
Like "leftist cultists"?

If these are included and okay due to free speech then why do leftist cultists and some of their ideological supporters use these terms?
You are free to say what you wish. However, that may involve consequences; see Alex Jones for an obvious example.

Here, you might get suspended if you don't follow CARM rules, and people might consider you a "rightist cultist".

"As you sow, so shall you reap."
 
Is misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation included in free speech and okay according to free speech? Why or why not?

Mis information is false information spread unintentionally
Dis information is false information spread intentionally.
Malinformation is information that is based on reality or facts but it is used to inflict harm.


If these are included and okay due to free speech then why do leftist cultists and some of their ideological supporters use these terms?

Freedom of speech only protects you from the government taking action against you for what you say.

It does not protect you from the social consequences of what you say.

A person who repeatedly spreads misinformation will get a reputation of being a bit of an idiot who can't check if something is correct.

A person who spreads disinformation repeatedly will get a reputation of being a liar and untrustworthy.

A person who spreads malinformation will get a reputation of being a vindictive liar.

It's not that complicated. If you don't want to get a bad reputation then don't tell lies, and don't be horrible to other people.
 
Which must break an existing law.

That makes sense. Hate speech for instance, is not protected if it includes true threats, incitement of violence, or defamation. However targeted harassment can be a grey area and may be interpreted as fighting words - even when words are not used.

1280px-Cross_Lighting_2005.jpg

Credit: Wikipedia Ku Klux Klan
___
 
Freedom of speech only protects you from the government taking action against you for what you say.

It does not protect you from the social consequences of what you say.

A person who repeatedly spreads misinformation will get a reputation of being a bit of an idiot who can't check if something is correct.

A person who spreads disinformation repeatedly will get a reputation of being a liar and untrustworthy.

A person who spreads malinformation will get a reputation of being a vindictive liar.

It's not that complicated. If you don't want to get a bad reputation then don't tell lies, and don't be horrible to other people.
Unfortunately, there seems to be no consequences with teeth against those that lie repeatedly, even if their lies can cause injuries and even deaths.
 
Is misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation included in free speech and okay according to free speech? Why or why not?

Mis information is false information spread unintentionally
Dis information is false information spread intentionally.
Malinformation is information that is based on reality or facts but it is used to inflict harm.


If these are included and okay due to free speech then why do leftist cultists and some of their ideological supporters use these terms?
Everyone of these definitions have something in common. Each of these definitions turn on correctly attributing a motive to the speaker. We already know that our friends on the left will always attribute the least flattering motive to anyone they disagree with. Therefore to make it legal to curtail speech based on these definitions (misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation) is identical to repealing the first amendment. There is absolutely no other way of looking at it. If we can somehow get a cause of action into the Supreme Court the turns on the application of these for the purpose of curtailing speech you will see this to be proven out in the highest court in the land.
 
Everyone of these definitions have something in common. Each of these definitions turn on correctly attributing a motive to the speaker. We already know that our friends on the left will always attribute the least flattering motive to anyone they disagree with. Therefore to make it legal to curtail speech based on these definitions (misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation) is identical to repealing the first amendment. There is absolutely no other way of looking at it. If we can somehow get a cause of action into the Supreme Court the turns on the application of these for the purpose of curtailing speech you will see this to be proven out in the highest court in the land.
Oh, my. Have you looked at your own side lately?
You know, when you call us pedophiles, groomers, liars, baby-killers, etc.
 
Back
Top