So you've read and studied Amy Myshrall's massive 821 page thesis on Siniaticus and its correctors, have you?
Have you told her that she wasted a good portion of her life researching, studying, documenting and examining Sinaiticus, when all she would've had to do is sit behind her computer screen and read the nonsense spouted all over the internet by yourself and David Daniels?
Have you told her she's been duped by Simonides?
Who told you handwriting can easily be copied?
Do you have experience in the field or are you just statng a bunch of nonsense that you arent even qualified to write one sentence about?
And why did the guy in Simonides's day (can't recall the name offhand) bail on him, saying it was too hard to do what you say is so easy?
Simonides claimed the calligrapher at Athos was Dionysius. He chose that name because he knew it appeared in Sinaiticus, so he could then say “see, that’s proof!” Never mind there’s not one shred of evidence this was even true. After all, folks ask Athos later and there’s no Dionysius, Simonides will just come back with, “Of course not, he’s dead,” which is what he did with Benedict.
Remember - we have NO PROOF Benedict was even his uncle….other than his say so. And given how much else he lied about - as in everything - I have no reason to believe any relationship at all.
He made up letters from a Kallinikos nobody saw and claims about a calligrapher nobody ever saw. He claimed exemplars nobody ever saw so it’s not impossible he either made up Benedict OR at least the idea of them being related.
And he got his own birth date wrong, too. TWICE!
He has less credibility on Sinaiticus than Trump has on fiscal responsibility, which is to say “none.”