What good is a membership without a speaking engagement?
Do you have our conversation from the old CARM?
That would give the actual posts.
Wait a minute - you're implying here you're going to speak at a meeting next year you're not sure even exists??????
1) Next year's meeting is in San Antonio
2) the topic of submitted papers is "Theological Anthropology"
So.....did you not know this when you suggested you were going to be speaking at a meeting you're not sure even exists????
It's on BVDB (It wasn't on CARM).
- He also used it in Russia in another instance (I'm not sure of the exact timeline of this yet. It's in German. It could have been prior to the Sinaiticus debacle, or it could have been after being only slightly dead). [Okay, update, this took place in 1851, real time (not Simonides fictional timeline)]
So you think there are no plausible alternative explanations for the Codex Sinaiticus' "ancient appearance"?
I.e. the simpler and more obvious explanations like, it has an "ancient appearance" because it is ancient?
Or that it's "older appearance" is because it is really old?
With all Avery's diversionary talk of Sinaiticus's white colored leaves being some sort of supposed proof of 19th century composition, ask him why he hasn't told anyone that his precious 6th century Fuldensis is WHITE!
Lots of possibilities, regional, national, international.
Also various Journals.
Within some months to a year, I would be more interested in these venues.
Fauci says he is Mr. Science. "I am the Science."
Since you are so concerned about "anti-vaxx"
.. have you seen the new movie "Died Suddenly"?
If I was not on BVDB at the time, the post is worthless,
it does not show what were your words to me.
Your memory fails again, since your words to me were on CARM in Feb. 2018.
The thread was:
Who Darkened Sinaiticus? - colour variance - white parchment Frederico-Augustanus
Granted, your debate challenge memory failings are much worse.