Maybe if it came with free beignets mmmWould Roman Catholic Pope allow himself to be placed under a voodoo spell?
I must admit, I do enjoy the belly laugh these posts give me.Rome will embed and coexist with any pagan religion worldwide as long as it brings them under its dominion. The symbol of the papacy is an umbrella for a reason. It's how it always worked.
I must admit, I do enjoy the belly laugh these posts give me.
That's okay, I was just about to sacrifice a chicken to my pagan mother goddess anyway. I wonder if I can use KFC instead; at least that way, I don't have to clean up the blood.Sorry to interrupt your pagan bead counting JH. Laughing is healthy though.
At the beginning of the year 2002, Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II hosted another "pan-Christian" gathering at St. Francis of Assisi Basilica. Perhaps the pope did provide free beignets for those employed in his preparation of this event, when all of the crucifixes and trappings of traditional Catholicism were covered with drapes.Maybe if it came with free beignets mmm
Only when he is speaking excathedra.Would Roman Catholic Pope allow himself to be placed under a voodoo spell?
The chicken needs to be blessed first before you can offer it as a sacrifice.That's okay, I was just about to sacrifice a chicken to my pagan mother goddess anyway. I wonder if I can use KFC instead; at least that way, I don't have to clean up the blood.
Maybe. If so, he's got good taste.At the beginning of the year 2002, Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II hosted another "pan-Christian" gathering at St. Francis of Assisi Basilica. Perhaps the pope did provide free beignets for those employed in his preparation of this event, when all of the crucifixes and trappings of traditional Catholicism were covered with drapes.
Sort of ding, but only if Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II spoke his Roman Catholic voodoo ex cathedra, while in the room with the Muslims in the room facing Mecca, which he graciously provided for the Muslims during their stay at the Vatican (the 'room' was within the nun's convent on the lower level of the St. Francis of Assisi's Basilica).Only when he is speaking excathedra.
The Zoroastrians thought JP II had really "good taste" when he allocated a room with windows in it so that they could burn their wooden chips during their invited stay at the Vatican for another of JP's "pan-Christian" gatherings.Maybe. If so, he's got good taste.
I prefer my wooden chips fried but oh well...The Zoroastrians thought JP II had really "good taste" when he allocated a room with windows in it so that they could burn their wooden chips during their invited stay at the Vatican for another of JP's "pan-Christian" gatherings.
Do you think that the Jews who were invited to the Vatican 'gathering' also thought that Roman Catholic Pope JP II had "good taste" in providing them a room in the Vatican, that had not been blessed in the name of Jesus Christ?Maybe. If so, he's got good taste.
I have no idea. I'm sure there are lots of rooms in the Vatican (which is a huge place) that haven't been blessed in the name of Jesus Christ. Do you think Jews would have melted if they had to stay in such a room? I don't really get the point you're making.Do you think that the Jews who were invited to the Vatican 'gathering' also thought that Roman Catholic Pope JP II had "good taste" in providing them a room in the Vatican, that had not been blessed in the name of Jesus Christ?
Let me get right to the point which was one of the highlights of this ecumenical "gathering" assembled by Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II. It came when a voodoo priest ascended to the pulpit within the central sanctuary of the basilica to shake a rattle at all those in attendance, including the Roman Catholics "Holy Father" before placing them all under a voodoo spell of tranquility.I have no idea. I'm sure there are lots of rooms in the Vatican (which is a huge place) that haven't been blessed in the name of Jesus Christ. Do you think Jews would have melted if they had to stay in such a room? I don't really get the point you're making.
Where are you getting this from? I mean, if the source you are using is called: John Paul II: Manifest Heretic Who Claimed to Be Pope (1978-2005), I somehow am doubtful of its impartiality!!!Let me get right to the point which was one of the highlights of this ecumenical "gathering" assembled by Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II. It came when a voodoo priest ascended to the pulpit within the central sanctuary of the basilica to shake a rattle at all those in attendance, including the Roman Catholics "Holy Father" before placing them all under a voodoo spell of tranquility.
Michael Dimond and Peter Dimond, "John Paul II: Manifest Heretic Who Claimed to Be Pope (1978-2005)."
Is this what JP II's supposed predecessor Peter would have done? What about Jesus - how did that honor Him?
So what! Who cares what they are! How does that change what your Roman Catholic Pope JP II did?Where are you getting this from? I mean, if the source you are using is called: John Paul II: Manifest Heretic Who Claimed to Be Pope (1978-2005), I somehow am doubtful of its impartiality!!!
Can you show me some evidence to support this claim, please?
(Okay, looked up the authors. They are sedavacantist.)
Because I don't even know if he did that. When was he supposed to have done this? I'll see if I can find some other sources.So what! Who cares what they are! How does that change what your Roman Catholic Pope JP II did?
Answer my questions about the Popes actions - Is this what JP II's supposed predecessor Peter would have done? What about Jesus - how did that honor Him?
Here's a source for you from one of your own Roman Catholic Apologists: Robert Sungenis, reacting to Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II's ecumenical "gathering," written in an article for Catholic Apologetics International, in which he wrote:Because I don't even know if he did that. When was he supposed to have done this? I'll see if I can find some other sources.