Jan. 6. Ray Epps and death of Roseanne Boyland (Cremated after?) New Footage

Yes. Staged.

Most people involved in psychological operations, don’t realize it at the time. Most protesters during the BLM riots were not domestic terrorist and didn’t actually want their own cities destroyed. They didn’t realize they were part of a psyop. We do it in other countries all the time. Staging coups, Color Revolutions, for example. Remember the Ukrainian orange “revolution”… there was a Ukrainian guy that was actually involved in that operation that was spotted at J6. And there was a whole group of people with orange patches, orange shirts and hats. They were part of the actual operation to frame Trump supporters.

That it was staged.

Do you know who this is, with the “shaman” guy?

View attachment 3751

His name is Michiel Vos and he just so happens to be married to Pelosi’s daughter. So weird ?
Dude’s a reporter. This was a pretty big news story.

Your implication is nuts
 
Any objection to a state’s result must be submitted in writing. Only one member of both the Senate and the House of Representatives needs to sign an objection, which would suspend the joint session and force the houses retire to their respective chambers for up to two hours’ debate on the objection. This is where evidence could have been presented. Evidence which has still not been given a chance to see the light of day.
So why is that evidence being hidden by the people who claim so desperately that it should be presented?
What keeps them from presenting it?

And why, when Congress re-convened after the insurrection was quelled, did not a single election denier in Congress step up to do this? After all, over a hundred voted against certification.
 
Ad hominem
No it was not. An Ad Hominem would be more like: "What you say is wrong because you have a pimple on your nose." Backup criticised your implication, not you.

Back to logic school for you, I'm afraid.
 
So why is that evidence being hidden by the people who claim so desperately that it should be presented?
What people? Republicans? They don’t want evidence presented anymore than democrats do.
What keeps them from presenting it?
Why don’t they want to reveal that they're illegitimately holding office? Hmmm ? that’s a tough one.
And why, when Congress re-convened after the insurrection was quelled, did not a single election denier in Congress step up to do this? After all, over a hundred voted against certification.
Self preservation. I don’t think they ever actually intended to contest, even though many talked a big game. Again, why would they want to reveal they’re illegitimately holding office?
 
So why is that evidence being hidden by the people who claim so desperately that it should be presented?
What keeps them from presenting it?
Of election fraud? Not hidden, simply ignored.
And why, when Congress re-convened after the insurrection was quelled, did not a single election denier in Congress step up to do this?
It would also be ignored when it was filtered thru the media. There is no rational reason to assume no member of Congress had no problems with the 2020 and 22 elections. Your reasons are probably rooted in bias and delusion preferences over reality.
After all, over a hundred voted against certification.
That would be evidence and we do have a Repub House which will look into elections as it relates to Jan 6. Given a level playing field the Dems would be in the minority and Trump would be President. Kari Lake would be Governor of Arizona. The southern border would be closed and we would still be energy independent and there would probably be no conflict in Ukraine. Certainly there would be no 100 billion to Ukraine probably cash on pallets.
 
Of election fraud? Not hidden, simply ignored.

It would also be ignored when it was filtered thru the media. There is no rational reason to assume no member of Congress had no problems with the 2020 and 22 elections. Your reasons are probably rooted in bias and delusion preferences over reality.

That would be evidence and we do have a Repub House which will look into elections as it relates to Jan 6. Given a level playing field the Dems would be in the minority and Trump would be President. Kari Lake would be Governor of Arizona. The southern border would be closed and we would still be energy independent and there would probably be no conflict in Ukraine. Certainly there would be no 100 billion to Ukraine probably cash on pallets.
After the clown circus of the Arizona audit, Four Seasons Lawn Care, the elusive Kraken, etc. you people should give up on your election fraud conspiracies.
 
What people? Republicans? They don’t want evidence presented anymore than democrats do.

Why don’t they want to reveal that they're illegitimately holding office? Hmmm ? that’s a tough one.

Self preservation. I don’t think they ever actually intended to contest, even though many talked a big game. Again, why would they want to reveal they’re illegitimately holding office?
OK, so if not Republicans, then who are the people who have this so-called evidence and are hiding it?
And how is it that you know all about it, but cannot present it to the rest of us?
 
Yes. Staged.

Most people involved in psychological operations, don’t realize it at the time. Most protesters during the BLM riots were not domestic terrorist and didn’t actually want their own cities destroyed. They didn’t realize they were part of a psyop. We do it in other countries all the time. Staging coups, Color Revolutions, for example. Remember the Ukrainian orange “revolution”… there was a Ukrainian guy that was actually involved in that operation that was spotted at J6. And there was a whole group of people with orange patches, orange shirts and hats. They were part of the actual operation to frame Trump supporters.

That it was staged.

Do you know who this is, with the “shaman” guy?

View attachment 3751

His name is Michiel Vos and he just so happens to be married to Pelosi’s daughter. So weird ?
I Agree 100%, Pelosi's son in law hanging out with shaman, just a coincidence

Absolutely it was a pre-planned staged event, as Pelosi refused the National Guards presence, and was in full control of Capitol police, removing barricades and waving people in for a Capitol tour

Pelosi and company, criminals at large!
 
Of election fraud? Not hidden, simply ignored.

It would also be ignored when it was filtered thru the media. There is no rational reason to assume no member of Congress had no problems with the 2020 and 22 elections. Your reasons are probably rooted in bias and delusion preferences over reality.

That would be evidence and we do have a Repub House which will look into elections as it relates to Jan 6. Given a level playing field the Dems would be in the minority and Trump would be President. Kari Lake would be Governor of Arizona. The southern border would be closed and we would still be energy independent and there would probably be no conflict in Ukraine. Certainly there would be no 100 billion to Ukraine probably cash on pallets.
Congress does not get to decide who is POTUS.
Kari Lake lost.
You want to completely close the border to immigration and refugees? That would be a disaster.
And what circumstance would have eliminated the Ukrainian invasion?
 
I Agree 100%, Pelosi's son in law hanging out with shaman, just a coincidence

Absolutely it was a pre-planned staged event, as Pelosi refused the National Guards presence, and was in full control of Capitol police, removing barricades and waving people in for a Capitol tour

Pelosi and company, criminals at large!
And 900 Trump supporters got arrested and charged!
 
Congress does not get to decide who is POTUS.
Who wrote they did?
Kari Lake lost.
Debatable.
You want to completely close the border to immigration and refugees?
Who wrote that? Are you deluded?
That would be a disaster.
The southern border is a disaster under Biden.
And what circumstance would have eliminated the Ukrainian invasion?
Responded earlier and ignored by you. Opening up pipelines so we are energy independent and driving down oil prices worldwide. It would defund Russia which depends on oil profits for conducting invasion. This is the second time i told you this. When Biden closed down pipelines it profited Russia who was better able to finance war costs thru sale of oil at higher prices. Biden enabled Russia to conduct war.
 
OK, so if not Republicans, then who are the people who have this so-called evidence and are hiding it?
I didn’t say they don’t have it. I said they don’t want it presented. Evidence has been provided to the feds and to congress and is attached to a current lawsuit at scotus.
And how is it that you know all about it, but cannot present it to the rest of us?
I’ve presented it, but unless your trusted “news” people corroborate… you won’t even look at it.
 
I Agree 100%, Pelosi's son in law hanging out with shaman, just a coincidence

Absolutely it was a pre-planned staged event, as Pelosi refused the National Guards presence, and was in full control of Capitol police, removing barricades and waving people in for a Capitol tour

Pelosi and company, criminals at large!
the stuff you people believe
 
Your definition of coup is way off.
No...it actually isn't. A coup is a sudden appropriation of leadership or power; a takeover. You're missing the word "attempt"...Plural: attemptS. The criminals Schiff/Pelosi/Nadler etal tried twice, and now they're trying to manipulate the upcoming election before it takes place...

...and you favor their subterfuge because the thought of a free and fair election that leads to another Trump victory traumatizes you more than the thought of throwing the US Constitution into the shredder in exchange for tyranny that prevents the election of people you don't like.

Why have you given yourself over to dictatorship? Can you explain that? Or tell me you are not traumatized by another Trump victory?

Impeachment is a legal procedure, and described in the constitution. Both efforts were evidence based.
Felonious impeachments based on fraud, falsified documents, claims purchased by the opposition party to interfere with elections, and purchased censorship of all news is not legal. It's coup by pretense that is hoping to avoid the appearance of violence on the criminal party executing the coup. J6 was a brilliant ploy led by the genius Ray Epps and his undercover actors to make Pelosi look good as she and her criminal husband made more hundreds of millions on insider trading.,

There is no evidence of a stolen election.
Your set of talking points are not working.
Of course there is: Twitter and the anti-Social networks were paid for. The FBI paid them to keep Biden's several felonies from appearing. Zuck swore there would never be another 2016...
 
Staged? And yet >900 people were arrested and sentenced, many to years in prison. Who were these stupid people who volunteered for a staged event, and why were they all Trump supporters?

And what is that picture supposed to prove?
None of the folks (e.g. Ray Epps) who staged the event went to prison. The folks they duped, the grannies and gramps, went to jail...some for two years without charges or a trial.

That's unconstitutional, btw, but then...the constitution is only evoked after the fraudulent election was successfully stolen. No one cared about the constitution as long as Trump remained legally elected and in office. You had agreed to an unconstitutional coup, if the end result was the removal of the legally elected President of the United States from the office.
 
You are wrong. A coup is an attempt to overthrow a sitting president by illegal means.
I am correct. There was nothing legal about ANY of the attempted impeachment/coups. Falsified evidence. Fraudulent charges. Dossiers purchased by the opposition party and taken verbatim by the opposition law enforcement arm so that Michael Flynn, who has more integrity than all the Democrat party reps put together gets swatted, and Roger Stone gets a cBSCNNBC televised pre-dawn swat for the drama of it. FISA warrants falsified by the HEAD of the FBI so that Carter Page's life was ruined? Nothing legal.

There are provisions in the US Constitution to remove a sitting president, but those are legal, and so do not make a coup. Republicans impeaching President Clinton was not a coup. Democrats impeaching President Trump was not a coup either.
There used to be stringent rules to justify launching impeachment. "High crimes and misdemeanors" including using a cigar with an intern while heads of states are kept waiting in the Rose Garden. Those rules all shredded when the Clintons smeared their DNA over the office.

Impeachment is not a coup. January 6 was an attempted coup.
Legal impeachment is not a coup. Illegal impeachment by falsified means is a coup. Jan 6 was the opposite of a coup...led by Ray Epps and company, and ended when there was enough footage to edit the necessary outrage. The government was NEVER in jeopardy at any time. You had NO leaders.

Americans have been terrorized by grammies and pappies.
 
Back
Top