DoctrinesofGraceBapt
Well-known member
"Correct, but God is not called the Father in the NT. The Father is called God. And, the order matters."That's a confusing sentence for me. "One God in three persons" is the doctrine of the Trinity. How is one confusing and the other not?
It is a plurality of persons given the use of personal pronouns used to distinguish between them in Scripture. You would use "He, You, I" distinctions between different personal roles of one person.
Correct, but God is not called the Father in the NT. The Father is called God. And, the order matters.
Both, the Son of God, and the Son of Man are simply titles referring to Jesus. Stop over thinking this.
Yes, Jesus is all three, and that's utterly inconsequential to the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit being the three persons who are the one God.
BS: Why haven't you interacted with the Scripture I posted?
We see in the NT the plurality of God who is the Father and Jesus calls God his Father.
Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Joh 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
1Jn 1:1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;
1Jn 1:2 (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us![]()
1Jn 1:3 That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ.
Not one of these verses say "the plurality of God who is the Father" or even hint anything close to this.
Here it is showing that God is a plurality which is the Echad or God's oneness which is the Father and the Son in relationship.
I have no problem with this statement save adding the Holy Spirit: God's oneness which is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in relationship.
We see more of God's oneness in John chapter 17.
Jesus is "God with us" thus Jesus is God's oneness (Echad) which includes the Father and the Son of God and inherently in the son of man.
You do realize that I don't reject the oneness of God? I reject "the plurality of God who is the Father".
God Bless
BS: Why haven't you interacted with the Scripture I posted?
In reality, John 1:1-3 teaches Trinitarianism, and Isaiah 44:24 doesn't touch on the topic.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. John 1:1-3
So, this Word was with God, was God and made all things. Notice in one sense, this Word is God, and in another, this Word isn't God, but with God. Therefore, multiple persons, given the use of personal pronouns, who are the same God. No "the Same One God person". You read "the Same One God person" into both passages. That's why I said, "'You are just assuming your theology'. 'the Same One God person' isn't in either text. You added it."
Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer, who formed you from the womb: “I am the LORD, who made all things, who alone stretched out the heavens, who spread out the earth by myself, Isaiah 44:24
So, what is this saying? The one God made everything alone. Given that in the Trinity the Father, Son, and Spirit are the same God, no issues here. The one God made everything in both perspectives without any help form any other being. Also, the Trinity was revealed in the incarnation of the Son and in the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Since Isaiah 44:24 is prior to this perspective, there is no reason to think this verse is purposefully arguing against Trinitarianism. It's arguing against polytheism, and since we are not polytheists, it doesn't apply to us.