John 1:29

fltom

Well-known member
Still waiting for the reason for accepting the phrase "the Trinity" while proclaiming phrases not found in scripture are not Biblical. 🥱
Why won't RG deal with the evidence he asked for?

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.
 

Reformedguy

Well-known member
Why won't RG deal with the evidence he asked for?

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.
Still waiting on the reason as to why Tom accepts the phrase ",the Trinity" but then says if a phrase is not found in scripture it's unBiblical.
 

fltom

Well-known member
Still waiting on the reason as to why Tom accepts the phrase ",the Trinity" but then says if a phrase is not found in scripture it's unBiblical.
And you will wait forever because you are simply diverting from the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.
 

Reformedguy

Well-known member
And you will wait forever because you are simply diverting from the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.
Last time. Why do you assert if the phrase is not found in the Bible its unbiblical yet proclaim the phrase "the Trinity" as Biblical.
 

fltom

Well-known member
Last time. Why do you assert if the phrase is not found in the Bible its unbiblical yet proclaim the phrase "the Trinity" as Biblical.
Stop trying to change the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

and acknowledge the fact shown above
 

Reformedguy

Well-known member
Stop trying to change the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

and acknowledge the fact shown above
You said if a phrase is not found in scripture then it's not Biblical. Stupid I know, but in your zeal to be correct you said it. So do you affirm "the Trinity", a phrase not found in scripture scripture.
 

fltom

Well-known member
You said if a phrase is not found in scripture then it's not Biblical. Stupid I know, but in your zeal to be correct you said it. So do you affirm "the Trinity", a phrase not found in scripture scripture.
No, I did not

support your claim

and address the real issue


Stop trying to change the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

and acknowledge the fact shown above
 

Reformedguy

Well-known member
No, I did not

support your claim

and address the real issue


Stop trying to change the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

and acknowledge the fact shown above
Yes you did, I used a phrase which you whined and said that phrase is not found in the Bible and so is unBiblical. So is the Trinity unBiblical since the phrase "the Trinity" is not found in the Bible.
 

fltom

Well-known member
Yes you did, I used a phrase which you whined and said that phrase is not found in the Bible and so is unBiblical. So is the Trinity unBiblical since the phrase "the Trinity" is not found in the Bible.
Quote me

and address the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.
 

Reformedguy

Well-known member
Quote me

and address the issue

John 2:23–25 (KJV 1900) — 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. 24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, 25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.
Nope. You know you did hence you have been dodging my question.
 
Top