Latin Vulgate, Gutenberg, Wycliffe, and Luther

Integrity first.
Do you then in effect suggest that you should stop posting since you do not practice what you preach and since you do not retract and apologize for your false accusations?

Did you prove any intent to deceive on the part of that poster when there could be no such intent in this case because you alleged a failure to comprehend what you stated?
 
You suggested that a certain poster did not understand what you posted because of weakness in reading comprehension [perhaps your insult towards that poster], and yet you try to accuse him for supposedly a different offense for his same response when you already in effect gave him justification for it in that he supposedly did not comprehend [thus misunderstood] what you had stated. You cannot have it both ways. According to your own possible insult of that poster's reading comprehension, you would in effect be pretending unnecessarily to be offended.

Incredible gibberish.
 
Back
Top