John Milton
Well-known member
The same could be said of your Oneness garbage. Why do you give yourself a pass?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
latreuō
- Thread starter Fred
- Start date
Cop-outWhy should I do your work for you?
You're the heretic on stilts. You preach the false gospel of antichrist, that doesn't acknowledge the ability of Jesus to become human:
You are a liar. See post 107.
Yes, "you" said it. However I take my religion from the bible, and the bible does not say it.What I have said here is that Jesus was 100% God, became 100% man, and resumed being 100% God.
As I said: self-condemned.You are a liar. See post 107.
Which proves he wasn't YHWH (his Father is: Ps 110:1).
This proves Jesus is YHWH in that He is the proper recipient of 'pelach' (worship) in Daniel 7:14.
Psalm 110:1
The LORD says to my Lord: “Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.” (ESV)
Mark 14:62
And Jesus said, “I am, and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” (ESV)
Daniel 7:13
I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. (ESV)
You conveniently left out a part that doesn't fit into your twisted way of thinking.God is not a man (Num 23:19); so you don't agree. You just pretend to agree, which is BS.
God is not a man that He should lie.
Jesus never lied so He isn't included with sinful men.
Your teaching is so warped which makes it so easy to refute. Your attack on the Lord Jesus using the Old Testament continues to be a disaster.
https://forums.carm.org/threads/gnt-grammar-does-not-support-%E2%80%9C-god-the-son%E2%80%9D.11233/page-10#post-875270
As I said: self-condemned.
False accusation on your part.
Last edited:
John Milton
Well-known member
This is one of a couple of ways that the Bible could be understood. Your understanding isn’t one of those ways.Yes, "you" said it. However I take my religion from the bible, and the bible does not say it.
My attack on the Lord Jesus? You are so warped you don't understand that you're an antichrist just for denying that God was his Father.Jesus never lied so He isn't included with sinful men.
Your teaching is so warped which makes it so easy to refute. Your attack on the Lord Jesus using the Old Testament continues to be a disaster.
And also, you are the one who perverted the OT by inferring that God said "I am not a sinful man...." Rather "I am not [any] man....."
My understanding that Jesus had a God is precluded by the bible? You are like the Pharisees: you have no idea of how far away you are from truth.This is one of a couple of ways that the Bible could be understood. Your understanding isn’t one of those ways.
You are condemned for denying that God was the Father of Jesus, which further infers that Jesus wasn't a man.False accusation on your part.
My attack on the Lord Jesus?
Yes.
And also, you are the one who perverted the OT by inferring that God said "I am not a sinful man...." Rather "I am not [any] man....."
You purposefully left out the rest of what Numbers 23:19 says.
You have made lies your refuge and under falsehood have you hid yourself.
....being a heretic.You are condemned for
You are a veritable persecutor: the kind that Christ warned against.Yes.
If God could be a man, he wouldn't have said "I am not a man." What the rest of Numbers 23:19 says is irrelevant.You purposefully left out the rest of what Numbers 23:19 says.
Actually, come to think of it, if God could be a man, why doesn't he set up permanent residence on earth?
Unlike you, God has a measure of consistency and coherence.
Yes, I know. When you have properly addressed how God could have a God, then you may be relieved of your heresy. Until then, everything you say comes not from Christ but from your vanity.....being a heretic.
You are a veritable persecutor:
Quit your whimpering.
Yes, I know. When you have properly addressed how God could have a God, then you may be relieved of your heresy. Until then, everything you say comes not from Christ but from your vanity.
You refused to specify which passages refer to the Father and which passages refer to the Lord Jesus (posts 115-116), so I am not going to do anything you request.
I have already cleaned up the mess of your confusion several times with various topics/passages.
Last edited:
I don't do tasks set by you.You refused to specify which passages refer to the Father and which passages refer to the Lord Jesus (posts 115-116), so I am not going to do anything you request.
You are incoherent on everything. It's such that your ego is so vast, that you imagine it must prevail. So thought Pharoah also. If you can't even explain how God could have a God, you are not worth the time of day.I have already cleaned up the mess of your confusion several times with various topics/passages.
I don't do tasks set by you.
Then don't ask me to respond to your garbage questions/requests.
Your doctrine is trash.
John Milton
Well-known member
There’s nothing wrong with this. The problem is that you seem to think he has a God now.My understanding that Jesus had a God