Which proves he wasn't YHWH (his Father is: Ps 110:1).
You conveniently left out a part that doesn't fit into your twisted way of thinking.God is not a man (Num 23:19); so you don't agree. You just pretend to agree, which is BS.
My attack on the Lord Jesus? You are so warped you don't understand that you're an antichrist just for denying that God was his Father.Jesus never lied so He isn't included with sinful men.
Your teaching is so warped which makes it so easy to refute. Your attack on the Lord Jesus using the Old Testament continues to be a disaster.
My attack on the Lord Jesus?
And also, you are the one who perverted the OT by inferring that God said "I am not a sinful man...." Rather "I am not [any] man....."
You are a veritable persecutor: the kind that Christ warned against.Yes.
If God could be a man, he wouldn't have said "I am not a man." What the rest of Numbers 23:19 says is irrelevant.You purposefully left out the rest of what Numbers 23:19 says.
Yes, I know. When you have properly addressed how God could have a God, then you may be relieved of your heresy. Until then, everything you say comes not from Christ but from your vanity.
I don't do tasks set by you.You refused to specify which passages refer to the Father and which passages refer to the Lord Jesus (posts 115-116), so I am not going to do anything you request.
You are incoherent on everything. It's such that your ego is so vast, that you imagine it must prevail. So thought Pharoah also. If you can't even explain how God could have a God, you are not worth the time of day.I have already cleaned up the mess of your confusion several times with various topics/passages.