Untrue. Have you forgotten already what you said? Unable or too idle to scroll back a few posts?How? The point put to you was that the human being in the womb is the human being in the womb whether I call it a person or you don't.
Only opinion about the use of a word, the human being in the womb suffers because you dont like attributing the word 'person' to it
You don't even know what tap dancing is. Or perhaps you just didn't read my post. Try again.The difference therefore is your use of the word person. As to when the human being can feel pain, and therefore whether it suffers is a subsequent point you have just made, hence your tap dancing. As to your subsequent point, Most of the research I have seen says the baby or foetus can feel pain at 20 weeks, which doesn't help your defence of the UK abortion up to 24 weeks. So what is the point of your tap dancing?
The situation has changed, not just since the Act was introduced, but also since 2007. The vast majority (85 %) of abortions are now medically induced, 88% occur before week 10. In 2007 more than 60%of abortions were surgical. Most women are either married or with partners. The average age is increasing with very few abortions now for under 18s. Abortion rates for those under 23 are dropping, while for women over 35 they are rising. Comments made 14 years ago, no matter who made them, are just not relevant to today's situation. Sorry, but 24 year old newspaper articles are not a basis for criticism.You are desperate... unless you have any statements to the contrary from him. Lets see them Temujin seeing as you keep spouting these claims.
On the contrary, you got caught out. You cited those who made the 1967 law and when I quoted what they have subsequently said to undermine your claims, you dont like it