Nope. Are you trying to say the sperm only has 50% of the DNA that the resulting human being has? If so, yes of course.
Life from non life?
- Thread starter Saber Truth Tiger
- Start date
What do you mean by female?
rossum
Well-known member
Both eggs and sperm have mitochondria. However, in sperm the mitochondria are in the tail to provide energy for swimming, not in the head. Normally only the head enters the egg, not the tail, so only the female mitochondria are present in the zygote. Biology being occasionally sloppy there are a few, very few, instances of mitochondria from sperm getting into the zygote. See here for an overview.
Temujin
Well-known member
Thanks. That's really interesting, And obvious now I think of it, since the sperm needs a source of energy .
Yeah, what do you mean by female?
Yes, and? Are you trying to say the sperm only has 50% of the DNA that the resulting human being has? If so, yes of course.
Then not for you only.
God made man from the dust of the earth. That is what men are. You seem to be claiming to be something else.
Only in your mind. A sperm is not a man, is it?
It is clear that you don't know that you are a man.You think you are a word that was invented in the 13th century.
The paint is not Ford, is it? The Ford is not paint is it? In the same way, sperm is not a man.
You previously said "A single sperm lacks 50% of human DNA. Similarly each egg lacks 50% of human DNA." But even though you still havent said, I assume you mean the sperm only has 50% of the DNA that the resulting human being has
Ok so why did we misunderstand each other?
No, I dont see what you are trying to say. The skin is human, its human skin, but its not a human being.
But that is what I am saying, a sperm is not a man, but it is a man's sperm
I have said nothing of the sort.
but identifies someone with XY chromosomes, male anatomy and male reproductive organs, right?
I understand you full well
that is because you are blind to what i am saying
No the skin is skin. It is the skin of a man. Your word games are not working here.The word human was invented in the 13th century. Are you saying that there were no humans before the 13th century?
And you are a man because God made man. So a sperm is not a man and a man's sperm is not a man.
The implication is clear. Do you agree that you are a man, that God made man and that the word human was invented in the 13th century?
All mammals have an XY chromosomal sex determining system. What is your point?
or you are talking complete nonsense. And despite claiming it you obviously do not understand what I am saying.
No, the skin of a human being is obviously human skin.
never said it was. You are arguing with yourself
what implication? The words human and human being are used.
the point is what I wrote, not what you responded with.
Nope...
I showed you that i understand
In fact, it is the skin of a man. But it (the skin) is not a man. Only in your word games will your manipulation work. There is no mention of human in the bible. This is a bible discussion forum. The bible says God made man. Are you speaking about "man"?
Unless you are saying there is a difference between a human (man) and a human being (man), you are saying a sperm is a man.
BMS said:
Of course the human egg and sperm are human. They combine to make a human being.
That is why I said ..."then your crap is human" Crap comes out of a human and an unused egg comes out of a human.
Nope I am arguing with your nonsense, you think there is a difference between a human and a human being.
You are trying to make them not mean the same thing. A human is a human being and a human being being is a human. You are trying to make human skin into a human when human obviously refers to human beings.
The point is that what you wrote is exposed as nonsense by what I responded with.
You said
If a sperm is fully human, then your crap is fully human.
What is the difference between a human and a human being? Human= man. Human being = man.
Eightcrackers
Well-known member
Ok
obviously not since I didnt understand you
A man is a human being, so it is the skin of a human being
Again, I agree
what word games, I have just once again agreed with you.
More specifically (Genesis 2, God's image is a man and a woman.
But ok, the words human being and human are not really Biblical
Nope. I am saying what I have written, kindly address that
I agree, a human as in human being
no. there isnt. But a human being has human skin
true, and human sperm is not a human being,
rossum
Well-known member
Not strictly. This thread is is the Secular section, hence there are some of us non-Christians here. For strictly Bible discussions you need to be somewhere in the specifically Christian sections.
I didn't say strictly, did I?
good
Your not understanding has nothing to do with me understanding.
Therefore, a human being is a man. They both mean the same thing.
the skin of a human is not a man, therefore it is not a human.
Do you actually agree that the skin is not a human? While the skin may belong to a human, it is not a human. It is the same with crap. The crap may belong to a human, but it is not a human.
The one that i am exposing.
really? then you agree that a man's skin is not a man.
Wrong...there is a male man and a female man..
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
But you are using them to refer to a man are you not?
I am addressing what you have written
which is referring to man (male and female)
then there is no difference when you say "man" either.
A human being has skin. A human has skin. A man has skin. The skin is not human, it is skin. A human being has crap. Is the crap human?Or is the crap, crap?
Can you define human?
No, rossum said it, and rossum was right in saying "Not strictly. This thread is is the Secular section, hence there are some of us non-Christians here. For strictly Bible discussions you need to be somewhere in the specifically Christian sections."