No proof that you haven't ignored.
Interesting, but none of this proves Jesus is Messiah.
Nope...It only proves that He was crucified, that He was whipped and crowned with thorns. That he was pierced...as you shall see...and that His hands and feet were pierced as David foretold. It also proves that he rose from the dead in a blinding flash of light, and his initial movements can be seen on the cross.
Actually, it wasn't a claim. Isaiah 63:16 states it openly that the Father is the Redeemer.
He was in Messiah redeeming the world, as it is written.
Redemption was always by the blood, where the soul of the animal is found, life for life.
You're the only one who thinks your god...Only you will call this "support".
Zero record as neither Josephus nor any Roman of the time recorded such an event that would have been visible to all.
False claim. There were contemporaries who kept record and who saw and wrote. Your selective choice of witnesses is a convenient handicap necessary to buttress denial, despite what you have been presented here as contemporary and incontrovertible physical evidence.
Your claim here is not proof...just vacuous drivel and wishful thinking. She was wrong and imaginative, as I showed.
No blood applied anywhere. Besides, doesn't fulfill the commandment in Lev 17:11.
You're desperate. "11
For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for your souls upon the altar; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul." There is no blood applied here...Just a fact of light. This is why posting chapter and verse is so specious. This doesn't buttress your claim, it deflates any credibility.
On the other hand Hebrews says this:
But when Christ came as high priest of the good things that have come, He went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not made by hands and is not a part of this creation. 12He did NOT enter by the blood of goats and calves, but He entered the Most Holy Place once for all BY His own blood, thus securing eternal redemption.…
NO WHERE does Leviticus 17:11 say the blood is applied. The soul is in the blood...the blood has a purpose. Hebrews SHOWS the purpose and the application.
Yep...I do. You, on the other hand, do not. Your argument fails and your claim is refuted.
In fact, by your standard, I see Moses commanding the blood be applied to the horns of the altar, and I NEVER see Aaron doing it. It never even happened...If Aaron entered the Holy of Holies, and application of the blood with which he entered is not written down, no application of the blood was ever made. Show me where any priest actually applied blood to altar once the commandment was made?
You're setting a bizarre standard.
No error on my part. Show where the blood was applied on the altar. That should be simple for you.
I showed you where blood entered the HEAVENLY Holy of Holies, after which pattern the tabernacle was designed. The writer of Hebrews, clearly better versed than you on the testimony of the Tenach, left it to your understanding that the High Priest, once entered with the Blood, applied it as HE HIMSELF commanded it should be applied, being the Word of God Himself.
He also knew, having met recalcitrant Jews insisting on denial, that many of you would not understand nor grasp the testimony of scripture. Hebrews was written to those with faith, without which it is impossible to please God.
Actually, they continued thru 70CE.
Daniel survived without sacrifices too.
Daniel did not survive without direct encounters with the Word of God...your situation is in no way analogous.
Sorry, but the commandments are clear and Jesus didn't fulfill Lev 17:11. Until Heaven and Earth.
See above. Your claim is sadly specious.