Massive study reveals COVID vax linked to untreatable eyeball clots

ferengi

Well-known member
'Significantly' greater risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion

– A major scientific journal has published research linking COVID vaccinations to retinal vascular occlusion, with vaccinated individuals at “significantly” greater risk of developing blood clots than unvaccinated individuals.

The paper published in Nature harvested data on some 95,156,967 people. Of those, 7.3 million met the criteria for inclusion in the study.
Controlling for confounding variables such as people on anticoagulants, certain contraceptives, and other medications, the researchers were left with 745,041 vaccinated and 3.8 million unvaccinated subjects to compare. They found that “two years after vaccination, the chances of all subtypes… of retinal vascular occlusion increased significantly in the vaccinated cohort.”
 
'Significantly' greater risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion

– A major scientific journal has published research linking COVID vaccinations to retinal vascular occlusion, with vaccinated individuals at “significantly” greater risk of developing blood clots than unvaccinated individuals.

The paper published in Nature harvested data on some 95,156,967 people. Of those, 7.3 million met the criteria for inclusion in the study.
Controlling for confounding variables such as people on anticoagulants, certain contraceptives, and other medications, the researchers were left with 745,041 vaccinated and 3.8 million unvaccinated subjects to compare. They found that “two years after vaccination, the chances of all subtypes… of retinal vascular occlusion increased significantly in the vaccinated cohort.”
World Nut’s still pushing COVID denial?

lol
 
'Significantly' greater risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion

– A major scientific journal has published research linking COVID vaccinations to retinal vascular occlusion, with vaccinated individuals at “significantly” greater risk of developing blood clots than unvaccinated individuals.

The paper published in Nature harvested data on some 95,156,967 people. Of those, 7.3 million met the criteria for inclusion in the study.
Controlling for confounding variables such as people on anticoagulants, certain contraceptives, and other medications, the researchers were left with 745,041 vaccinated and 3.8 million unvaccinated subjects to compare. They found that “two years after vaccination, the chances of all subtypes… of retinal vascular occlusion increased significantly in the vaccinated cohort.”
Do you have the actual study available? I do.


This large-scale cohort spanning two years investigate the association between retinal vascular occlusion and COVID-19 vaccination. A 2.19-fold increased risk of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination was observed. Limited evidence and low frequency of the disease has complicated the establishment of a definitive association between both. The current findings support the conclusions of this case series. This emphasizes the necessity for a thorough study and ophthalmologists to consider the likelihood of retinal vascular occlusion in vulnerable patients following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccination is suggested to protect against COVID-19, since the incidence of retinal vascular occlusion remains extremely low.
 
Last edited:
Do you have the actual study available? I do.

They specifically say this is debatable. Even if they finally found a side effect of the vaccine, it certainly doesn’t prove any of the COVID deniers insane conspiracies.
 
Last edited:
Btw, forgot to note: the complications noted are not untreatable, and also happen with Covid itself. So this is not a great reason to refuse vaccinattion.
 
'Significantly' greater risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion

– A major scientific journal has published research linking COVID vaccinations to retinal vascular occlusion, with vaccinated individuals at “significantly” greater risk of developing blood clots than unvaccinated individuals.

The paper published in Nature harvested data on some 95,156,967 people. Of those, 7.3 million met the criteria for inclusion in the study.
Controlling for confounding variables such as people on anticoagulants, certain contraceptives, and other medications, the researchers were left with 745,041 vaccinated and 3.8 million unvaccinated subjects to compare. They found that “two years after vaccination, the chances of all subtypes… of retinal vascular occlusion increased significantly in the vaccinated cohort.”
Yeah, that could turn out to be a risk of being vaccinated. Now all that's left is to show causation, and then compare the risk of being vaccinated to the risk of being infected with covid-19 while not being vaccinated.
 
Yeah, that could turn out to be a risk of being vaccinated. Now all that's left is to show causation, and then compare the risk of being vaccinated to the risk of being infected with covid-19 while not being vaccinated.
The nice part of this study is that it was large enough to illuminate possible pre-existing conditions that could contribute to any clotting associated with vaccines.
 
The nice part of this study is that it was large enough to illuminate possible pre-existing conditions that could contribute to any clotting associated with vaccines.
The other part is that they picked a complication (retinal microvascular injury and thrombosis) that could be a) readily observed b) was clinically manifest c) for which there were good animal models and d) which was also a complication of Covid-19. There's lots of good evidence that both the virus and to a much lesser degree the vaccine cause microvascular disease that is medited by the rsponse to the spike protein, and there are a host of vascular thrombotic diseases that are associated with the vaccines, so none of this should be surprising. Another great thing here is they can give very good quantitative absolute and relative risk estimates, which they haven't been able to do with the known large venous thrombotic complications in a systematic way (I mean, to see the retinal vasculature you just look in the eye. To see the visceral veins adequately is a lot more complicated and expensive). So it's almost certainly due to the vaccination itself
 
The other part is that they picked a complication (retinal microvascular injury and thrombosis) that could be a) readily observed b) was clinically manifest c) for which there were good animal models and d) which was also a complication of Covid-19. There's lots of good evidence that both the virus and to a much lesser degree the vaccine cause microvascular disease that is medited by the rsponse to the spike protein, and there are a host of vascular thrombotic diseases that are associated with the vaccines, so none of this should be surprising. Another great thing here is they can give very good quantitative absolute and relative risk estimates, which they haven't been able to do with the known large venous thrombotic complications in a systematic way (I mean, to see the retinal vasculature you just look in the eye. To see the visceral veins adequately is a lot more complicated and expensive). So it's almost certainly due to the vaccination itself
Clotting has been linked to vaccines in the past as well but was rare enough that it wasn't closely studied. The novelty and politics of the mRNA vaccines have almost forced researchers to concentrate more on even the rare side effects. That is a good thing.
 
Yeah, that could turn out to be a risk of being vaccinated. Now all that's left is to show causation, and then compare the risk of being vaccinated to the risk of being infected with covid-19 while not being vaccinated.
Its not a vacination and it does nothing for covid 19
 

This is typical from Myers. he doesnt actually address the issues but talks round the issues. He is rambling what is on his mind, NOT addressing the specific points.
Children havent died in anything like the numbers adults have AT ALL. WHY??? No wonder people are sceptical.
I think the vaccines were necessary but Bridgen wipes the floor with Myers. People like Bridgen and Campbell are getting threatened and silenced by the like of the tranny brigade who cant even tell what a woman is.

The conspiracy is Myers. All he can do is try and disparage Bridgen. Bridgen has the qualifications and the science, Myers has hatred
 
Irrelevant - the fact is its an experimental gene therapy that was purposley not tested nor explained properly
It was tested appropriately for the circumstances.

And it was explained well enough for me to understand. Don't know about you.

Prove the jabs prevent getting or transmitting covid
First, no one has claimed that the covid-19 vaccines make it impossible for you to get or transmit the disease. I don't believe anyone has claimed that for any other vaccine, either.

As to how effective they are at reducing the risk of infection, hospitalization, and death, the evidence is plentiful.

 
Back
Top