Yes it was a slip of the tongue. Only a total moron would try to make it anything else. Was it daft? Yes. Was it as daft as "covfefe"? No.
Ah, I see you are making comment on a person's mathematical ability while having no ability yourself. Rather hypocritical wouldn't you say?
Wow. That's an excellent breakdown of the fatal flaws in this latest attempt by crybaby Trumpians to deny the reality they lost the election. The only real question is Cicchetti really that incompetent or (more probably) he was paid a good sum by the Republicans to come up with bogus probability numbers they were desperate to hear. So this document is actually good evidence of Republicans committing deliberate fraud.
Did you at least understand the point of the analogy of measuring the heights of the school kids vs. measuring the heights of professional basketball players? You can't assume a single uniform population when measuring the two very different groups. That's the blunder (or willful dishonesty) Cicchetti made.
And here we see A.N. resorting to a rant against liberals rather than address the substantive statistical flaws any first-year statistics student would recognize. He says the case was dismissed on standing, not on merit. But he refuses to even discuss the merit of the case, which Matt Parker utterly destroyed. As for Andy's question, I don't think Cicchetti is incompetent. In fact, it is his very competence that enabled him to construct a plausible-sounding statistical argument (plausible to those who do not understand statistics.) Matt Parker illustrated that perfectly in his construction of an equally flawed (albeit deliberately, tongue-in-cheek) proof of the one in a quadrillion chance at the end of his video.
For Cicchetti to put his name to something so clearly flawed is very strange. He must have realised people would study this and find the flaws; he is trashing his own reputation with this.
You offer flaws by the boat load. Your global warming generates flawed, (junk) predictions 50 solid years.
Have you actually read Cicchetti's report? That is the subject of this thread, Authie. Either you think it is right or you think it is wrong. Or you lack the mental ability to decide.