Matthew 23:13

brightfame52

Well-known member
You believe that someone can stop someone accepting the truth of God's word by being misled, well I agree with that. Doesn't Total depravity teach that no one can accept the truth of God's word, now you appear to be arguing they can, but can be prevented from doing so by bad teachers.

Please just confirm, can a person by themselves put their trust in God, can they believe in Jesus by their own free choice, or does God have to make them believe? Can you clarify what you believe?
Jn 6:44

44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Doesnt sound like Jesus is saying here man has freewill choice to believe in Him, sounds like the opposite !
 

LeeH

Well-known member
How can they?

How did Jim Jones........ How did Joseph Smith........ How did CT Russel?

What information did they lack that you have?

Why are they false teachers and you not?

What made you so special to understand the actual truth and then to make a decision to believe? What is special about you that did not make you depraved but a righteous man capable of discerning Spiritual truths?
What made you so special to understand the actual truth and then to make a decision to believe?
I didn't understand the truth, I am not expected to, that's the point, I just trusted in God and God revealed himself to me by the power of the holy spirit, you have heard the term, born again, haven't you? Are you saying these scriptures below are not true?

Romans 10:13
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Acts 2:21
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

What is special about you that did not make you depraved but a righteous man capable of discerning Spiritual truths?
Tell me, did you not trust in the Lord, how can the Lord God save an unbeliever, without having any trust in him, at all? That in itself sounds crazy, it goes against all scripture.

What is special about you
What is special about you, that God decided to ignore all his teachings and save you, even though you had no trust in him at all, you had no more trust in him than any atheist has at that time he saved you?

What information did they lack that you have?

You can read the bible inside and out for all eternity, without trust in it that is God's written word, what good is it to you?

Does God want you to come to him with knowledge or trust, what must come first, trust or knowledge? Can knowledge reveal God without trust, do you think you can work out who God is on your own?

Did you not read my testimony above?
 

LeeH

Well-known member
Jn 6:44

44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Doesnt sound like Jesus is saying here man has freewill choice to believe in Him, sounds like the opposite !
That is true, God's word is true. Now tell me do you believe by reading the scriptures, that you can be saved by having no trust in God whatsoever, ie, zero trust?
Does that fit with the scriptures?

Does trust or faith come first? Which comes first, can you have faith and then trust?
 

Manfred

Well-known member
I didn't understand the truth, I am not expected to, that's the point, I just trusted in God and God revealed himself to me by the power of the holy spirit, you have heard the term, born again, haven't you? Are you saying these scriptures below are not true?

Romans 10:13
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Acts 2:21
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Not saying any scriptures are false. Do not start with misrepresenting people.
Your interpretation of scripture can be questioned.

My question to you stands.
What made you special waiting on the Lord?
What about others who have waited on the Lord and ended up following J. Jones or Smith or Russel.
Why did you choose right and they chose wrong? What made you special to know you were waiting on the "right" Lord and then chose the right one, or were you just lucky?
Tell me, did you not trust in the Lord, how can the Lord God save an unbeliever, without having any trust in him, at all? That in itself sounds crazy, it goes against all scripture.
What do you mean? I was lying on an army bed, reading a book and minding my own business when a guy came up to me and shared the gospel with me. The trust came after I was saved.

Those people following J. Jones and Koresh were also trusting the Lord, just the wrong one. How did they not know and you knew which was the right one to trust and put your faith in. What made you different?

What is special about you, that God decided to ignore all his teachings and save you, even though you had no trust in him at all, you had no more trust in him than any atheist has at that time he saved you?
Nothing special about me. I the most undeserved sinner was saved by God. It was His grace that saved me, not because I was special and new I had to choose to believe in Him.

So tell me, if God saves an atheist in the next minute how does that happen? Or do you think atheists just put their trust in God and then decide to believe in Him.
When did they make such a decision? Did it happen overnight?

You can read the bible inside and out for all eternity, without trust in it that is God's written word, what good is it to you?
No good whether you believe like the JJ, and Koresh crowd that you did place your trust in God, or not.

Does God want you to come to him with knowledge or trust, what must come first, trust or knowledge? Can knowledge reveal God without trust, do you think you can work out who God is on your own?
No. But free willers seem to think so.
Don't you make a choice from your natural fallen free will? Are you not the one choosing by knowledge and trust. I am sure the JJ and Koresh crowd did the same.
Did you not read my testimony above?
No, I did not.
What I did read is that you think Calvinism is false.

God does not choose, but you choose. Is that correct?
God does not elect, you elect yourself. Is that correct?

Did you choose to get revelation from God, or did God choose to reveal Jesus Christ to you as Lord and savior.
When God revealed Jesus Christ to you as Lord and savior, did you then use your human will to decide to trust Him, or did your love and trust flow from the revelation you received?
Did you even have to decide to believe, or did your spirit cry out to Him?

God is love, and He saves you. You are His child not by merit or trust but by Grace through faith which He grants you.
 

CrowCross

Super Member
Lydia was already a "worshiper of God", which means God's Spirit was already leading her and was simply confirming and completing her faith, much as Cornelius in Acts 1



lydia was not saved until God opened her heart to hear Paul present the gospel.
That's interesting, did Jesus tell us to pick up our cross and let him carry it? We have to pick up our cross and follow!

Doug
Salvation is not works based.
 

brightfame52

Well-known member
That is true, God's word is true. Now tell me do you believe by reading the scriptures, that you can be saved by having no trust in God whatsoever, ie, zero trust?
Does that fit with the scriptures?

Does trust or faith come first? Which comes first, can you have faith and then trust?
Regeneration is first, then Faith from that
 

LeeH

Well-known member
Why did you choose right and they chose wrong? What made you special to know you were waiting on the "right" Lord and then chose the right one, or were you just lucky?
It's not a question of choosing God, it's a question of trusting in God, that hear will hear you, surrendering to God's will. I don't know the people you are reffering to, but maybe they didn't. I don't know who they are.

My question to you stands.
What made you special waiting on the Lord?
What about others who have waited on the Lord and ended up following J. Jones or Smith or Russel.
Why did you choose right and they chose wrong? What made you special to know you were waiting on the "right" Lord and then chose the right one, or were you just lucky?
I trusted God and God revealed himself to me, it's a supernatural revelation, I can't describe it, it's a spiritual awareness. If your born again you would know the what that moment is like. I can't say that happens with everyone, the same experience, people experience their moment in different ways, but Jesus is revealed to them. I never at at time have I said I am special, you say that. I am not special in any way.
What do you mean? I was lying on an army bed, reading a book and minding my own business when a guy came up to me and shared the gospel with me. The trust came after I was saved.
Well it's not for me to question your salvation, I have an open mind to how God can save a person and he may very well do it that way. So I don't disbelieve you.

Nothing special about me. I the most undeserved sinner was saved by God. It was His grace that saved me, not because I was special and new I had to choose to believe in Him.
Why do you keep saying that word special, do you think I am special, because I put my trust in God and cried out to him?

So tell me, if God saves an atheist in the next minute how does that happen? Or do you think atheists just put their trust in God and then decide to believe in Him.
When did they make such a decision? Did it happen overnight?

Go read my testimony, I was an atheist, wasn't you, before?

No. But free willers seem to think so.
Don't you make a choice from your natural fallen free will? Are you not the one choosing by knowledge and trust. I am sure the JJ and Koresh crowd did the same.

Trust in God is when you empty yourself of all pride, faith in oneself and any knowledge and rely totally on God. Do you disagree with that?

You seem to be against a person trusting in God when you are unsaved, you seem to suggest it's prideful, but okay to trust when you are saved.

Do you tell a unsaved person don't trust in God for your salvation that's prideful, pride is a sin, so what you are saying effectively when a person doesn't believe in God, you must not trust him for your salvation, that is sinful to trust in God. That is what you are saying. You actually believe that?

Have you always been a calvinist, or did you first come to believe in the simple gospel that I believe in. How did you come to learn about calvinism, who convinced you, did you work it out all on your own? Or did looking at the internet, reading various scriptures that all seem sewn together give you a completely new picture of God's salvation? I wonder, was OSAS the first thing you believed and the rest of Tulip followed. Did you have some difficulty swallowing the T, total depravity? That must be a hard one, I bet lots of calvinist struggle at first with that one, like swallowing a camel I would have thought. Yet I say, I trusted in God, something the size of a nat and you choke on the very idea of it.

Did you choose to get revelation from God, or did God choose to reveal Jesus Christ to you as Lord and savior.

I chose to trust God and God chose to reveal Jesus Christ to me, so both. I have to say I was amazed it happened, I wasn't expecting it, well not an answer that quickly, which was instantly.

When God revealed Jesus Christ to you as Lord and savior, did you then use your human will to decide to trust Him, or did your love and trust flow from the revelation you received?
The moment Jesus was revealed to me, I knew him, trust is automatic, you can't unknow something can you?

Did you even have to decide to believe, or did your spirit cry out to Him?
I asked, I realised I could never know him any other way. I just asked and in an instant it was revealed to me. You can claim God forced me to, he made me. Yet why have me waste a whole year of searching for him, why not do it right away, was he saying humble yourself lee, you want to know me, then trust me, don't think you can know me through your own knowledge, you can't figure me out, unless I agree. I figure that is how it worked.

What I did read is that you think Calvinism is false.
Yes I do, if I didn't think that, I would not be here.

God does not choose, but you choose. Is that correct?
God does not elect, you elect yourself. Is that correct?
God chooses, of course he does, you understand that, I understand that. The question is on what basis does God reveal himself to an unbeliever.

You say God chooses and he does, look at Paul, he had no trust in Jesus, he was persecuting Jesus's followers, God is sovereign. Yet my testimony shows that is not how Jesus was revealed to me or many others and also the bible shows, that you can open the door to Jesus, so scripture fits with man's ability to trust in Jesus for salvation.

Calvinism doesn't teach that, in fact the patchment of scripture that calvinists huddle together paints a very different picture of man's ability and God's word is very powerful is it not? The problem you have is, there are loads of scripture that clearly contradicts your beliefs. You see this scripture, like the one I posted and you choose to ignore it.

God is sovereign you believe that, I mean that is what you calvinists bang on about, well who are you to tell God how he can reveal himself to people?

You don't get to tell God how he reveals himself to someone, if he chooses Mary to be the mother of his son, he is sovereign and if he wishes to reveal himself in whatever way he wishes to someone, he can, whether it be through a conversion like Paul or through someone trusting him.

The scriptures are clear and they don't fit calvinism ideology, or peoples experience and you also have many other issues arising like the justice in creating people and sending them to eternal damnation for just being made the way they are with no ability to be anything else.

It's like God creating a blind man and saying you are blind, why didn't you see, I am going damn you to hell for that.

No doubt your answer is God is sovereign and yes it's true God is sovereign, but he is not unjust. How you can believe such a thing, seems like you are swallowing a lot more than a camel, but the entire animal kingdom, all in one go.
 

TibiasDad

Well-known member
lydia was not saved until God opened her heart to hear Paul present the gospel.

She was a true worshiper of God, just as Cornelius was, and just as the Ephesians who were only baptised by John's baptism. Their hearts were already in tune with God's, but their minds did not have the full story yet!

Salvation is not works based.
Didn't say it was....but it is synergistic! Matt 16:24Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.

God calls, man either follows him or not, reveling his truest desire. (And note that Jesus said that man can desire to follow--but we must act subsequent to that desire to be true disciples.)


Doug
 

TibiasDad

Well-known member
But you don't believe that, do you, you believe in total depravity, no one can prevent people from entering the kingdom of God, because everyone is depraved and can't call on God anyway, whether they are cut off, led astray, given false teachings, makes no difference, they can't respond.

I believe it, because I don't believe in total depravity.

You don't believe in total depravity? I'm not a Calvinist, far from it, but I do believe in total depravity! We cannot save ourselves by ourselves! God's action is always first and the only effectual power of reconciliation. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater!

Doug
 

LeeH

Well-known member
You don't believe in total depravity? I'm not a Calvinist, far from it, but I do believe in total depravity! We cannot save ourselves by ourselves! God's action is always first and the only effectual power of reconciliation. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater!

Doug
Do you believe in total depravity, where people cannot respond at all, that is calvinism isn't it? You may have misunderstood me, I don't know, I don't believe in total depravity where a person has no ability to respond to God.

We cannot save ourselves by ourselves!

I don't believe that, where did I say that?
 

ReverendRV

Well-known member
Do you believe in total depravity, where people cannot respond at all, that is calvinism isn't it? You may have misunderstood me, I don't know, I don't believe in total depravity where a person has no ability to respond to God.
The point of my last few Posts to you is that if we're not Totally Depraved, then we're Saved by our very own 'Prevenient' Free Will, and no one really wants to go on Record as saying that, since it's Unorthodox; because Grace would no longer be Grace. It's Mormonism, because they're Saved by Grace; "after" all they can do. You never want any necessary aspect of Salvation to precede God's Grace...
I don't believe that, where did I say that?
I'm the one that said that. He and I are often close to agreeing...
 
Last edited:
G

guest1

Guest
Do you believe in total depravity, where people cannot respond at all, that is calvinism isn't it?
James Arminius taught it as well .


Jacob Arminius writes,

“IN the state of Primitive Innocence, man had a mind endued with a clear understanding of heavenly light and truth concerning God, and his works and will, as far as was sufficient for the salvation of man and the glory of God; he had a heart imbued with ‘righteousness and true holiness,’ and with a true and saving love of good; and powers abundantly qualified or furnished perfectly to fulfill the law which God had imposed on him. This admits easily of proof, from the description of the image of God, after which man is said to have been created, (Gen 1:26-27) from the law divinely imposed on him, which had a promise and a threat appended to it, (Gen 2:17) and lastly from the analogous restoration of the same image in Christ Jesus. (Eph 4:24, Col 3:10)



But man was not so confirmed in this state of innocence, as to be incapable of being moved, by the representation presented to him of some good, (whether it was of an inferior kind and relating to this animal life, or of a superior-kind and relating to spiritual life) inordinately and unlawfully to look upon it and to desire it, and of his own spontaneous as well as free motion, and through a preposterous desire for that good, to decline from the obedience which had been prescribed to him. Nay, having turned away from the light of his own mind and his chief good, which is God, or, at least, having turned towards that chief good not in the manner in which he ought to have done, and besides having turned in mind and heart towards an inferior good, he transgressed the command given to him for life. By this foul deed, he precipitated himself from that noble and elevated condition into a state of the deepest infelicity, which is under the dominion of sin. For ‘to whom any one yields himself a servant to obey,’ (Rom 6:16) and ‘of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage,’ and is his regularly assigned slave. (2 Pet 2:19)



In this state, the free will of man towards the true good is not only wounded, maimed, infirm, bent, and weakened; but it is also imprisoned, destroyed, and lost. And its powers are not only debilitated and useless unless they be assisted by grace, but it has no powers whatever except such as are excited by Divine grace. For Christ has said, ‘Without me ye can do nothing.’ St. Augustine, after having diligently meditated upon each word in this passage, speaks thus: ‘Christ does not say, without me ye can do but Little; neither does He say, without me ye can do any Arduous Thing, nor without me ye can do it with difficulty. But he says, without me ye can do Nothing! Nor does he say, without me ye cannot complete any thing; but without me ye can do Nothing.’ That this may be made more manifestly to appear, we will separately consider the mind, the affections or will, and the capability, as contra-distinguished from them, as well as the life itself of an unregenerate man.”
6



Arminius further writes,

“THIS is my opinion concerning the free-will of man: In his primitive condition as he came out of the hands of his creator, man was endowed with such a portion of knowledge, holiness and power, as enabled him to understand, esteem, consider, will, and to perform the true good, according to the commandment delivered to him. Yet none of these acts could he do, except through the assistance of Divine Grace. But in his lapsed and sinful state, man is not capable, of and by himself, either to think, to will, or to do that which is really good; but it is necessary for him to be regenerated and renewed in his intellect, affections or will, and in all his powers, by God in Christ through the Holy Spirit, that he may be qualified rightly to understand, esteem, consider, will, and perform whatever is truly good. When he is made a partaker of this regeneration or renovation, I consider that, since he is delivered from sin, he is capable of thinking, willing and doing that which is good, but yet not without the continued aids of Divine Grace.” 7



 

ReverendRV

Well-known member
James Arminius taught it as well .
All it takes is one Verse for us to believe in a Doctrine, especially when a Good Teacher said it...

But of course there are many more Verses; a thing is established by two or three Witnesses. Matthew 16:17 teaches that the Grace of God is always dispensed first in Salvation, before any other aspect. We're NOT Saved by dispensing our 'Prevenient' Free Will...
 
Last edited:

brightfame52

Well-known member
leeh

Do you believe in total depravity, where people cannot respond at all, that is calvinism isn't it? You may have misunderstood me, I don't know, I don't believe in total depravity where a person has no ability to respond to God.

Its not that the natural cannot respond, but because he is spiritually dead, he cant respond, spiritually, positively, or pleasing to God.
 

LeeH

Well-known member
The point of my last few Posts to you is that if we're not Totally Depraved, then we're Saved by our very own 'Prevenient' Free Will, and no one really wants to go on Record as saying that, since it's Unorthodox; because Grace would no longer be Grace. It's Mormonism, because they're Saved by Grace; "after" all they can do. You never want any necessary aspect of Salvation to precede God's Grace...

I'm the one that said that. He and I are often close to agreeing...
Romans 10:13
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

According to calvinism, that is not possible. Who should I believe? John Calvin or Jesus, tough one that.

The rich man said what do I need to do to be saved, Jesus said give away all your money and follow me. Jesus is telling him you have to do something, but calvinism teaches, we have no ability to. So Jesus is just toying with him, not being straight, honest.

Imagine if we replaced the words of the gospel and inserted the calvinist version, what you calvinist really believe.

Rich man says to Jesus what do I need to do to inherit eternal life, Jesus replies, nothing, you have been created for damnation. Its harder for a rich man to get into heaven, actually strike that, it's impossible for anyone to get into heaven unless God has predestined them.

For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord don't waste your time, that is impossible and if you did, that would be a sinful prideful thing to do and I will ignore you anyway.

What a gospel, who would want to preach that, wouldn't get many takers, maybe that is why it has to be sugar coated with false promises of being saved and stuff, like open the door and I will come in. Maybe that should read, I will knock on the door you can't open it, because it's nailed from the outside or don't worry you can't open it, I will just smash it in.

Did the thief on the cross really get saved, maybe when he got there and saw it, Jesus said, you don't have the right clothes on, sorry, down to hell you go. Jesus never lied, did he, he just didn't give him the fall SP and he did see paradise, just for a moment. Well how do we know, lets face it, it's hard to know anything according to calvinism, the bible says do this and you will be saved, but calvinism, says, no you can't, not possible, don't even think of trying it.

How about this one and I really love this, when Jesus says:

Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.

Come? How you supposed to do that, that is clearly impossible, your inability doesn't allow it, Jesus is asking the impossible according to calvinism.

If I believed in calvinism, I would have a great problem believing most of this scripture, I have to say. Thankfully I don't, you calvinists should be given a medal or something for your level of faith in John Calvins doctrine.

Someone asks me what do I need to do to be saved, I would say Jesus said do this, but calvinism which tells us what the true gospel says, says you can't do nothing, everyone is predestined, some to hell, some to heaven. If you are predestined to heaven, God will save you anyway, so sit tight, he will get round to you. Should I sin, well apparently according to calvinism, you can't lose your salvation. If you are predestined to be destroyed in hell, well, I guess hmm, well, I can't help you, try Islam, actually they have predestination too, hmm, mormonism, get your own planet and become a god, sounds like a lot work, running your own planet, I have enough hassle running my own life, let alone a planet full of people. Then they ask but I thought the God of the bible was the God of hope, he is, but just not for those he made for destruction.

Trust in the Lord, they might ask, hmm, that's pride to think you can do that, pride is a sin, no can't do that. What can I do to be saved, nothing, absolutely nothing.

I guess if calvinists are happy to believe in this, go for it. I can swallow quite a lot, but I stop at camels, that is where I draw the line, if I had to swallow calvinism, I fancy I would have the hump for a very long time, (no pun intended, that's a lie, it was).
 

CrowCross

Super Member
She was a true worshiper of God, just as Cornelius was, and just as the Ephesians who were only baptised by John's baptism. Their hearts were already in tune with God's, but their minds did not have the full story yet!
There's a difference between a worshipper of God...and Jesus. She didn't know Jesus until her heart was opened.
Didn't say it was....but it is synergistic! Matt 16:24Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.

OK...so what?
God calls, man either follows him or not, reveling his truest desire. (And note that Jesus said that man can desire to follow--but we must act subsequent to that desire to be true disciples.)


Doug

I don't think the context of that verse was around total depravity.
 

CrowCross

Super Member
Romans 10:13
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

According to calvinism, that is not possible. Who should I believe? John Calvin or Jesus, tough one that.

The rich man said what do I need to do to be saved, Jesus said give away all your money and follow me. Jesus is telling him you have to do something, but calvinism teaches, we have no ability to. So Jesus is just toying with him, not being straight, honest.

Imagine if we replaced the words of the gospel and inserted the calvinist version, what you calvinist really believe.

Rich man says to Jesus what do I need to do to inherit eternal life, Jesus replies, nothing, you have been created for damnation. Its harder for a rich man to get into heaven, actually strike that, it's impossible for anyone to get into heaven unless God has predestined them.

For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord don't waste your time, that is impossible and if you did, that would be a sinful prideful thing to do and I will ignore you anyway.

What a gospel, who would want to preach that, wouldn't get many takers, maybe that is why it has to be sugar coated with false promises of being saved and stuff, like open the door and I will come in. Maybe that should read, I will knock on the door you can't open it, because it's nailed from the outside or don't worry you can't open it, I will just smash it in.

Did the thief on the cross really get saved, maybe when he got there and saw it, Jesus said, you don't have the right clothes on, sorry, down to hell you go. Jesus never lied, did he, he just didn't give him the fall SP and he did see paradise, just for a moment. Well how do we know, lets face it, it's hard to know anything according to calvinism, the bible says do this and you will be saved, but calvinism, says, no you can't, not possible, don't even think of trying it.

How about this one and I really love this, when Jesus says:

Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.

Come? How you supposed to do that, that is clearly impossible, your inability doesn't allow it, Jesus is asking the impossible according to calvinism.

If I believed in calvinism, I would have a great problem believing most of this scripture, I have to say. Thankfully I don't, you calvinists should be given a medal or something for your level of faith in John Calvins doctrine.

Someone asks me what do I need to do to be saved, I would say Jesus said do this, but calvinism which tells us what the true gospel says, says you can't do nothing, everyone is predestined, some to hell, some to heaven. If you are predestined to heaven, God will save you anyway, so sit tight, he will get round to you. Should I sin, well apparently according to calvinism, you can't lose your salvation. If you are predestined to be destroyed in hell, well, I guess hmm, well, I can't help you, try Islam, actually they have predestination too, hmm, mormonism, get your own planet and become a god, sounds like a lot work, running your own planet, I have enough hassle running my own life, let alone a planet full of people. Then they ask but I thought the God of the bible was the God of hope, he is, but just not for those he made for destruction.

Trust in the Lord, they might ask, hmm, that's pride to think you can do that, pride is a sin, no can't do that. What can I do to be saved, nothing, absolutely nothing.

I guess if calvinists are happy to believe in this, go for it. I can swallow quite a lot, but I stop at camels, that is where I draw the line, if I had to swallow calvinism, I fancy I would have the hump for a very long time, (no pun intended, that's a lie, it was).
I find it hard to swallow the I don't need God to accept Jesus....I can do it on my own.

Especially in light of verses such as John 6:65
 

TibiasDad

Well-known member
Do you believe in total depravity, where people cannot respond at all, that is calvinism isn't it? You may have misunderstood me, I don't know, I don't believe in total depravity where a person has no ability to respond to God.

There are a couple of ways to look at this, neither of which give your apparent position, namely, that man retains a natural and unadulterated capacity to comprehend our relationship to God and to initiate reconciliation to God, support.

First, Calvinism is not the only protestant position that holds that man, in his natural state, is incapable of responding to or initiating reconciliation with God. Arminians, Lutherans, and Traditionalist all hold to man's natural inability to do anything in relation to God.

Secondly, from my perspective, as the offended party, God is the only one that ultimately establishes the potential and effectualness of reconciliation. In other words, we cannot respond to or seek a reconciliation that is never offered. God is under no obligation to respond to any effort that we can put forth, if indeed we can do anything.

I don't believe that, where did I say that?

If one has a natural ability to respond, then they have no need of God, and effectively place God in the bend of obligation to man's advances. You don't say this explicitly, but it is the logical conclusion of your position.

Incidentally, welcome to CARM!


Doug
 

ReverendRV

Well-known member
Romans 10:13
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

According to calvinism, that is not possible. Who should I believe? John Calvin or Jesus, tough one that.
Yes, I do believe it's Totally Possible; and so does Calvinism...

Any Verse which says "we can", it means we must Presume that Grace has already appeared to that person and made a 'real' difference for them. After Grace? Sure; everyone can believe...

I guess if calvinists are happy to believe in this, go for it. I can swallow quite a lot, but I stop at camels, that is where I draw the line, if I had to swallow calvinism, I fancy I would have the hump for a very long time, (no pun intended, that's a lie, it was).
I'm a Calvinist, and I can't swallow what you claim is Calvinism either. Calvinism says all who have received the Grace of God can Freely believe the Gospel...

I suppose I need to cut-to-the-chase; Do you believe you can get Saved without Grace?

Incidentally, welcome to CARM!


Doug
Yes; welcome to CARM :)
 
Last edited:

ReverendRV

Well-known member
There's a difference between a worshipper of God...and Jesus. She didn't know Jesus until her heart was opened.


OK...so what?


I don't think the context of that verse was around total depravity.
Acts 17;23; For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: to an unknown god. So you are ignorant of the very thing you worship—and this is what I am going to proclaim to you.
Lydia ignorantly Worshipped God; but not as much as the Athenian Philosophers ignorantly Worshipped God. Jews today Worship God; but ignorantly, not in Spirit and in Truth. Without this Truth, Worship is ignorant...
 
Top