I'm not saying knowledge doesn't require a mind, and the difference between knowledge and existence is available to anyone capable of using a dictionary.How do you KNOW that's true, when you can't and don't KNOW anything without a believing mind and KNOWLEDGE silly?
How do you KNOW there is no mind or knowledge required or entailed for "locating existence" or "no mind is required as existence", when in reality you can't KNOW anything without a believing mind and existing silly. You are pretending to know the unknowable.
You've spent a decade posting the same confused nonsense that convinces no-one, and you have a disbelieving mind when it comes to anything anyone says to you. By your own argument, that makes reality unknowable to you.The difference is that you have spent a decade showing everyone how and why the truth and reality isn't known to you. And I have spent it showing how and why the truth and reality is knowable.
No-one said JTB isn't belief. I said it isn't only belief. How many letters in "JTB", Tercon? Can you count them?Wrong, because in reality Justified True Belief is still belief, it didn't stop being belief because some deluded unbelievers couldn't deal with its implications.
Most things. Again, you need to learn the difference between knowledge and existence.What do you know of that doesn't require and entail a believing mind silly?
I never said I was denoting something that isn't knowable.And if you aren't referring to and denoting something that is knowable or doesn't entail a mind to experience existence, then what are you denoting silly?
You've spent a decade posting nonsense that literally not a single other person has ever agreed with.Wrong, I spent a decade talking about how and why the truth and reality is knowable and you have spent a life time hiding from IT.
Wrong. Compare: If a bachelor is still human, then being human must be sufficient for being a bachelor.So, if JTB is still a belief, then belief must be sufficient in order to make the truth and reality knowable.
I am denoting the universe, which is knowable and does not entail a mind in order to exist.
Unsupported. It was perfectly analogous. See below.
Cf: If all unmarried male humans are humans, and only humans can become bachelors, then being a human is sufficient for being a bachelor as well.
Cf: If only beliefs can be justified true beliefs, then being a justified true belief must be sufficient for and entail being a belief as well.
Nothing can be known without belief. That's not my claim. Object permanence is the means by which it is known that things can exist without requiring any mind.What about "object permanence" can be known to occur or exist without YOUR belief or knowing anything about it?
I literally just told you: The universe.But what are you denoting that "is knowable and does not entail a mind in order to exist" or occur?
Analogies, not strawmen. And the above was your bait & switch, i.e. not analogous to your original claim.Strawman and I didn't say any such thing. Rather I said that: If only humans can be bachelors, then being a bachelor must be sufficient for and entail being human as well. And you have not shown this to be false or illogical. Strawman.
Correct, but not in dispute. Cf: If all unmarried male humans are humans, then some humans must be sufficient in order to make them bachelors. And they are still humans rather than something else. Duh! Obviously some humans are bachelors (the unmarried adult male ones), even though being human is not sufficient for being a bachelor. Likewise, some beliefs are knowledge (the justified and true ones), even though belief alone is not sufficient for knowledge.And if all justified true beliefs are beliefs, then some beliefs must be sufficient in order to make the truth and reality known. However, they are still beliefs and not something else that are not beliefs. And those beliefs must be sufficient in order to make the truth and reality known.
So you are saying that the need to believe one thing in the chain of understanding i.e. "object permanence", means that nothing can exists without belief? Even though the thing we applied the idea of "object permanence" to wasn't previously known?
So if all bachelors are human does that mean that all humans are bachelors?
Since your unbelieving mind lacks belief in atheism's ability to exist in reality, you can't even make the truth known to yourself.Well you certainly won't find any evidence of the truth in an unbelieving mind, because they can't even make the truth known to themselves.
That's because the mods have been deleting his posts. Go find one of yours where you quoted him, but it now says "deleted". Click on the link - and you'll get a message saying the post doesn't exist.But it's also happened in posts where I have quoted him.